Endoscopy 2019; 51(05): E108-E110
DOI: 10.1055/a-0841-9831
E-Videos
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Endoscopic partial reversal of complicated single anastomosis gastric bypass

Jasmine Hui Er Chang
1   Department of Upper Gastrointestional and Bariatric Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
,
Damien Meng Yew Tan
2   Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
,
Weng Hoong Chan
1   Department of Upper Gastrointestional and Bariatric Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
,
Alvin Kim Hock Eng
1   Department of Upper Gastrointestional and Bariatric Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
,
Eugene Kee Wee
1   Department of Upper Gastrointestional and Bariatric Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
,
Jeremy Tian Hui Tan
1   Department of Upper Gastrointestional and Bariatric Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
,
Chin Hong Lim
1   Department of Upper Gastrointestional and Bariatric Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
21 February 2019 (online)

Prior to the widespread use of therapeutic endoscopy, surgery was the only way to achieve restoration of normal bowel continuity after resection and bypass of a diseased or obstructed gastrointestinal tract. However, with the advancement of endoscopic skills and devices, endoscopic approaches now provide possible alternatives [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]. This procedure is particularly useful for patients with hostile abdomen and high operative risk.

A 68-year-old man underwent a laparoscopic single anastomosis or mini-gastric bypass (MGB), with 1.5 metre bilio-pancreatic limb, in 2013 for morbid obesity and poorly controlled diabetes mellitus. Postoperatively, he suffered from severe malnutrition despite increasing oral intake and protein supplements. He was experiencing diarrhea and bilateral lower-limb edema secondary to hypoalbuminemia (18 g/L). He underwent a computed tomography-guided insertion of a gastrostomy tube into the excluded stomach in January 2018 to optimize nutrition by recruiting the excluded foregut. An elective endoscopic partial reversal of MGB ([Fig. 1], [Video 1]) was then performed 5 months later.

Zoom Image
Fig. 1 Pictorial representation of the procedure. a Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and 5-mm endoscope inserted concurrently. b 19-gauge needle puncture from gastric pouch into excluded stomach under EUS guidance. c 15 × 10 mm Hot Axios (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, Massachusetts, USA) lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) inserted to create gastro-gastric anastomosis.

Video 1 Endoscopic partial reversal of single anastomosis gastric bypass.


Quality:

The procedure was performed under general anesthesia. Fluoroscopy was utilized throughout for adjunct imaging. Two operators, each with individual endoscopy towers, were required for the procedure ([Fig. 2]). The first operator inserted a 5-mm gastroscope (GIF-XP160; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) with a 24-Fr peel-away sheath (MIC-KEY; Halyard, Alpharetta, Georgia, USA) through the gastrostomy tract into the excluded stomach, while an echoendoscope (GF-UC140P-AL5; Olympus) was introduced transorally into the gastric pouch by the second operator. The ideal location for the gastro-gastric anastomosis was selected by using fluoroscopy ([Fig. 3 a]) and endoscopic visualization. A 19-gauge Flex endoscopic needle (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, Massachusetts, USA) was inserted through the echoendoscope to access the remnant stomach and a 0.025-inch VisiGlide guidewire (Olympus) was placed. A 15 × 10 mm Hot Axios stent (Boston Scientific) was deployed ([Fig. 3 b]) and dilated to 10 mm using a balloon (CRE Balloon-Dilator; Boston Scientific). A pediatric gastroscope was used to confirm satisfactory stent placement ([Fig. 3 c]). This procedure took approximately 60 minutes.

Zoom Image
Fig. 2 Operating room setup. EUS, endoscopic ultrasound.
Zoom Image
Fig. 3 Graphical representation of the procedure. a Fluoroscopic view: echoendoscope (EUS scope) and 5 mm endoscope were inserted concurrently. b A 19-gauge needle was used to puncture the gastric pouch into the excluded stomach under EUS guidance. c A 15 × 10 mm Hot Axios (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, Massachusetts, USA) lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) was inserted to create a gastro-gastric anastomosis. d Contrast study 3 months later showed smooth flow of contrast through the stent and gastrojejunostomy.

At follow-up 2 months later, the patient’s weight had increased from 61.8 kg to 65.8 kg and albumin levels had increased to 32 g/L. Contrast study after 3 months showed smooth flow of contrast through both the stent and the anastomosis, at a ratio of 60:40 ([Fig. 3 d]).

Endoscopy_UCTN_Code_TTT_1AO_2AC

Endoscopy E-Videos
https://eref.thieme.de/e-videos

Endoscopy E-Videos is a free access online section, reporting on interesting cases and new techniques in gastroenterological endoscopy. All papers include a high quality video and all contributions are freely accessible online.
This section has its own submission website at https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/e-videos

 
  • References

  • 1 Amateau SK, Lim CH, McDonald NM. et al. EUS-guided endoscopic gastrointestinal anastomosis with lumen-apposing metal stent: feasibility, safety, and efficacy. Obes Surg 2018; 28: 1445-1451
  • 2 Tyberg A, Perez-Miranda M, Sanchez-Ocana R. et al. Ultrasound-guided gastrojejunostomy with a lumen-apposing metal stent: a multicenter, international experience. Endosc Int Open 2016; 4: E276-E281
  • 3 Khashab MA, Kumbhari V, Grimm IS. et al. EUS-guided gastroenterostomy: the first U.S. clinical experience. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 82: 932-938
  • 4 Itoi T, Ishii K, Ikeuchi N. et al. Prospective evaluation of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided double-balloon-occluded gastrojejunostomy bypass (EPASS) for malignant gastric outlet obstruction. Gut 2016; 65: 193-195
  • 5 Lim CH, Leslie D, Ikramuddin S. et al. Novel endoscopic management of a pancreato-biliary limb obstruction by the creation of an entero-enterostomy following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Endoscopy 2016; 48: E99-E100