Download PDF
Appl Clin Inform 2021; 12(05): 1144-1149
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1740257
Research Article

Low Efficacy of Medication Shortage Clinical Decision Support Alerts

Nicole M. Benson
1   McLean Hospital, Belmont, Massachusetts, United States
2   Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
3   Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
,
Caryn Belisle
4   Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
,
David W. Bates
3   Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
4   Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
5   Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
,
Hojjat Salmasian
3   Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
4   Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
› Author Affiliations Funding N.M.B. received support from the National Library of Medicine Biomedical Informatics and Data Science Research Training Grant (BIRT) T15 LM007092.
› Further Information
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective We examined clinical decision support (CDS) alerts designed specifically for medication shortages to characterize and assess provider behavior in response to these short-term clinical situations.

Materials and Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of the usage of medication shortage alerts (MSAs) that included at least one alternative medication suggestion and were active for 60 or more days during the 2-year study period, January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2019, in a large health care system. We characterized ordering provider behavior in response to inpatient MSAs. We then developed a linear regression model to predict provider response to alerts using the characteristics of the ordering provider and alert frequency groupings.

Results During the study period, there were 67 MSAs in use that focused on 42 distinct medications in shortage. The MSAs suggested an average of 3.9 alternative medications. Adjusting for the different alerts, fellows (p = 0.004), residents (p = 0.03), and physician assistants (p = 0.02) were less likely to accept alerts on average compared with attending physicians. Further, female ordering clinicians (p < 0.001) were more likely to accept alerts on average compared with male ordering clinicians.

Conclusion Our findings demonstrate that providers tended to reject MSAs, even those who were sometimes flexible about their responses. The low overall acceptance rate supports the theory that alerts appearing at the time of order entry may have limited value, as they may be presented too late in the decision-making process. Though MSAs are designed to be attention-grabbing and higher impact than traditional CDS, our findings suggest that providers rarely change their clinical decisions when presented with these alerts.

Keywords

medication shortage - quality of care - cost of care - electronic health records

Protection of Human and Animal Subjects

The study was performed in compliance with the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki on Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects, and was reviewed by the Mass General Brigham Institutional Review Board.


Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 23 June 2021

Accepted: 20 October 2021

Article published online:
01 December 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 Ventola CL. The drug shortage crisis in the United States: causes, impact, and management strategies. P&T 2011; 36 (11) 740-757
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 United States Food & Drug Administration. FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb, M.D., updates on some ongoing shortages related to IV fluids. Published January 16, 2018. Accessed December 15, 2020 at: https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-commissioner-scott-gottlieb-md-updates-some-ongoing-shortages-related-iv-fluids
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Phend C. COVID-19 Puts ICU Sedatives into Shortage. Published April 3, 2020. Accessed December 15, 2020 at: https://www.medpagetoday.com/infectiousdisease/covid19/85796
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Plackett B. Why big pharma has abandoned antibiotics. Nature 2020; 2020: 586
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Business Wire. Premier Inc. Data: As COVID-19 Cases Spike, Demand for Drugs Used to Treat Related, Co-Morbid Conditions Also Soars. Published April 30, 2020. Accessed December 15, 2020 at: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20200430005788/en/Premier-Inc.-Data-As-COVID-19-Cases-Spike-Demand-for-Drugs-Used-to-Treat-Related-Co-Morbid-Conditions-Also-Soars
    Google Scholar
  • 6 American College of Rheumatology. Patients reported international hydroxychloroquine shortages due to COVID-19. ScienceDaily. Published November 6, 2020. Accessed January 26, 2021 at: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2020/11/201106103103.htm
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Phuong JM, Penm J, Chaar B, Oldfield LD, Moles R. The impacts of medication shortages on patient outcomes: a scoping review. PLoS One 2019; 14 (05) e0215837
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Tsapepas D, Der-Nigoghossian C, Patel K, Berger K, Vawdrey DK, Salmasian H. Medication stewardship using computerized clinical decision support: a case study on intravenous immunoglobulins. Pharmacol Res Perspect 2019; 7 (05) e00508
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Middleton B, Sittig DF, Wright A. Clinical decision support: a 25 year retrospective and a 25 year vision. Yearb Med Inform 2016; ;Suppl 1 S103-S116
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Yan L, Reese T, Nelson SD. A narrative review of clinical decision support for inpatient clinical pharmacists. Appl Clin Inform 2021; 12 (02) 199-207
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Fox ER, Sweet BV, Jensen V. Drug shortages: a complex health care crisis. Mayo Clin Proc 2014; 89 (03) 361-373
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Joglekar NN, Patel Y, Keller MS. Evaluation of clinical decision support to reduce sedative-hypnotic prescribing in older adults. Appl Clin Inform 2021; 12 (03) 436-444
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Friebe MP, LeGrand JR, Shepherd BE, Breeden EA, Nelson SD. Reducing inappropriate outpatient medication prescribing in older adults across electronic health record systems. Appl Clin Inform 2020; 11 (05) 865-872
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Hendrickson CD, McLemore MF, Dahir KM. et al. Is the climb worth the view? The savings/alert ratio for reducing vitamin D testing. Appl Clin Inform 2020; 11 (01) 160-165
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Vo P, Sylvia DA, Milibari L. et al. Management of a parenteral opioid shortage using ASHP guidelines. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2021; 78 (05) 426-435
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 van der Sijs H, Aarts J, Vulto A, Berg M. Overriding of drug safety alerts in computerized physician order entry. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2006; 13 (02) 138-147
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Beeler PE, Orav EJ, Seger DL, Dykes PC, Bates DW. Provider variation in responses to warnings: do the same providers run stop signs repeatedly?. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2016; 23 (e1): e93-e98
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Trinkley KE, Pell JM, Martinez DD, Maude NR, Hale G, Rosenberg MA. Assessing prescriber behavior with a clinical decision support tool to prevent drug-induced long QT syndrome. Appl Clin Inform 2021; 12 (01) 190-197
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Bhat S, Derington CG, Trinkley KE. Clinicians' values and preferences for medication adherence and cost clinical decision support in primary care: a qualitative study. Appl Clin Inform 2020; 11 (03) 405-414
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Ancker JS, Edwards A, Nosal S, Hauser D, Mauer E, Kaushal R. with the HITEC Investigators. Effects of workload, work complexity, and repeated alerts on alert fatigue in a clinical decision support system. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2017; 17 (01) 36
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Carroll AE. Averting alert fatigue to prevent adverse drug reactions. JAMA 2019; 322 (07) 601
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Shah SN, Amato MG, Garlo KG, Seger DL, Bates DW. Renal medication-related clinical decision support (CDS) alerts and overrides in the inpatient setting following implementation of a commercial electronic health record: implications for designing more effective alerts. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2021; 28 (06) 1081-1087
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Salmasian H, Blanchfield BB, Joyce K. et al. Association of display of patient photographs in the electronic health record with wrong-patient order entry errors. JAMA Netw Open 2020; 3 (11) e2019652
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Powers EM, Shiffman RN, Melnick ER, Hickner A, Sharifi M. Efficacy and unintended consequences of hard-stop alerts in electronic health record systems: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2018; 25 (11) 1556-1566
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Kawamoto K, Houlihan CA, Balas EA, Lobach DF. Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success. BMJ 2005; 330 (7494): 765
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Murphy EV. Clinical decision support: effectiveness in improving quality processes and clinical outcomes and factors that may influence success. Yale J Biol Med 2014; 87 (02) 187-197
    Google Scholar
  • 27 Harpaz R, Vilar S, Dumouchel W. et al. Combing signals from spontaneous reports and electronic health records for detection of adverse drug reactions. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2013; 20 (03) 413-419
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar