Who will be the Radiologists of Tomorrow? A survey of radiology during the “Practical Year” in Germany

Abstract

Purpose Aim of our study was to evaluate the motivation of medical students in their final year of medical school to choose radiology for further specialization by means of a Germany-wide survey.

Materials and Methods The survey was performed during the 2015/16 semester among German medical students in their four months radiology elective during the final year. Invitations for the study were distributed by the Student Secretariats of each university. The survey was web-based with EvaSys 7.0 software. Questions on radiology contents during medical studies and “practical year” were part of the survey. Plans for residency and possible advantages and disadvantages of radiology as medical specialty were inquired. Descriptive statistics and group comparisons were used as analysis methods.

Results 89 students participated in the survey at the beginning and 60 students at the end of the practical year. Of these 39 students could be identified who answered both questionnaires. Most students were satisfied with their final year radiology elective (mean 1.8 on a range from 1 to 5). Nevertheless, they criticized mentoring during routine work (mean 2.1) and a lack of educational courses (mean 2.1). Most students (83 %) were uncertain about their residency choice at the beginning of their “practical year” and about one fifth changed their plans. From the students’ point of view main advantages of radiology included contact with many other clinical disciplines (87 %) and the working conditions (68 %). The reduced patient contact (42 %), the large amount of work at a computer (43 %), and the dependency on referring physicians (42 %) were regarded as the main disadvantages. The students regarded the way radiology is taught during the studies as not practical enough. With regard to radiology the majority of students (63 %) felt poorly prepared for their future work.

Conclusion The “practical year” is important regarding the choice of future specialization. There was a high degree of satisfaction with the “practical year” in radiology. The mentoring during routine work and a lack of educational courses was mildly criticized. These factors provide room for improvement to foster students’ interest in radiology.

Key Points 

• The “practical year” is important regarding the choice of further specialization.

• Criticisms of radiology in the “practical year” were mentoring and courses.

• Students feel poorly prepared for their future work regarding practical radiological skills.

Citation Format

• Dettmer S, Fischer V, Paeßens C et al. Who will be the Radiologists of Tomorrow? A survey of radiology during the “Practical Year” in Germany. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2017; 189: 967 – 976

Key words

education - practical year - medical studies

• References

• 1 Kasch R, Engelhardt M, Förch M. et al. Physician Shortage: How to Prevent Generation Y From Staying Away – Results of a Nationwide Survey. Zentralbl Chir 2016; 141: 190-196
• 2 Osenberg D, Huenges B, Klock M. et al. Wer wird denn noch Chirurg? Zukunftspläne der Nachwuchsmediziner an deutschen Universitäten. Chirurg 2010; 6: 308-315
• 3 Schrauth M, Weyrich P, Kraus B. et al. Workplace learning for final-year medical students: a comprehensive analysis of student’s expectancies and experiences. Z Evidenz Fortbild Qual Im Gesundheitswesen 2009; 103: 169-174
• 4 Branstetter BF, Faix LE, Humphrey AL. et al. Preclinical medical student training in radiology: the effect of early exposure. Am J Roentgenol 2007; 188: W9-W14
• 5 Dettmer S, Schmiedl A, Meyer S. et al. Radiological anatomy – evaluation of integrative education in radiology. ROFO. Fortschr. Geb. Rontgenstr. Nuklearmed 2013; 185: 838-843
• 6 Thurley P, Dennick R. Problem-based learning and radiology. Clin Radiol 2008; 63: 623-628
• 7 Strickland CD, Lowry PA, Petersen BD. et al. Introduction of a virtual workstation into radiology medical student education. Am J Roentgenol 2015; 204: W289-W292
• 8 Schober A, Pieper CC, Schmidt R. et al. “Anatomy and imaging”: 10 years of experience with an interdisciplinary teaching project in preclinical medical education – from an elective to a curricular course. ROFO. Fortschr. Geb Rontgenstr Nuklearmed 2014; 186: 458-465
• 9 Kasch R, Wirkner J, Hosten N. et al. Subinternship in Radiology – A Practical Start to the Specialization?. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2016; 188: 1024-1030
• 10 Kourdioukova EV, Verstraete KL, Valcke M. Radiological clerkships as a critical curriculum component in radiology education. Eur J Radiol 2011; 78: 342-348
• 11 Fischer V, Brandt K. Längsschnittliche Analyse von Querschnittsbefragungen mittels eines Persönlichen Codes. Vortrag auf Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Medizinische Ausbildung (GMA). Bern, 14.-17.09.2016. Düsseldorf: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House. 2016 Doc V27–68. n.d.
• 12 Putz R. Entwicklung der Studiengänge nach der neuen Approbationsordnung 2002. Vortrag auf MFT-Tagung. Berlin: 21.10.2010. n.d.
• 13 Bundesrat. Approbationsordnung für Ärzte (ÄAppO). Bundesanzeiger. 2002 http://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/bundesrecht/_appro_2002/gesamt.pdf abgerufen am 25.01.2017
• 14 Hoffmann SAW. Ihre Anfrage an das IMPP vom 1.9.2016. E-Mail vom 07.11.2016. 2016
• 15 Köhl-Hackert N, Krautter M, Andreesen S. et al. Workplace learning: an analysis of students’ expectations of learning on the ward in the Department of Internal Medicine. GMS Z Med Ausbild 2014; 31: Doc43
• 16 Abendroth J, Schnell U, Lichte T. et al. Motives of former interns in general practice for speciality-choice--results of a cross-sectional study among graduates 2007 to 2012. GMS Z Med Ausbild 2014; 31: Doc11
• 17 Dettmer S, Weidemann J, Fischer V. et al. Integrative teaching in radiology – a survey. ROFO. Fortschr. Geb. Rontgenstr. Nuklearmed 2015; 187: 260-268
• 18 Medizinischer Fakultätentag 2015. Nationaler Kompetenzbasierter Lernzielkatalog Medizin (NKLM). http://www.nklm.de/files/nklm_final_2015–07–03.pdf abgerufen am 30.01.2017. n.d.
• 19 Ertl-Wagner B, Barkhausen J, Mahnken A. et al. White Paper: Radiological Curriculum for Undergraduate Medical Education in Germany. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2016; 188: 1017-1023