CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Journal of Academic Ophthalmology 2023; 15(02): e178-e183
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1774400
Research Article

Impact of Gap Years Following Medical School Graduation on Resident Research Productivity in Ophthalmology

1   Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey
,
Aman M. Patel
1   Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey
,
Priya Tailor
1   Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey
,
Siddhant Kumarapuram
2   Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, New Jersey
,
Riya H. Patel
3   The College of New Jersey, Ewing, New Jersey
,
Sri Guttikonda
4   Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey
,
Rithika Sriram
4   Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey
,
Ramya Swamy
5   Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
,
Salman Yousuf
6   Department of Ophthalmology, Howard University College of Medicine, Washington, District of Columbia
,
Mona A. Kaleem
7   Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
› Author Affiliations
Financial Support None.

Abstract

Background Gap years following medical school graduation have become more common, but research into their tangible career benefit is lacking. Examining the impact of gap years on resident scholarly productivity in ophthalmology may provide insight generalizable to all specialties.

Objective To evaluate whether a gap year following medical school graduation significantly predicts scholarly productivity during ophthalmology residency.

Methods In December 2021, residents were recorded from 110 publicly available American ophthalmology residency program webpages. They were included if educational history was listed on publicly accessible academic and social media profiles. Residents were then stratified into gap year and nongap year cohorts. Publication data were recorded from Scopus and PubMed. Pearson's chi-square, independent sample t-tests, and multivariable regression were performed.

Results A total of 1,206 residents were analyzed, with 1,036 (85.9%) residents taking no gap year and 170 (14.1%) residents with at least one gap year. Gap year residents were predicted to have increase in the likelihoods of publishing at least one, two, or five total articles during residency, in addition to at least one article in a high-impact journal. There was no significant relationship between gap years and publications with senior authors affiliated with either the resident's medical school or residency program.

Conclusion Residents taking gap years following graduation may publish more during residency, but these publications are not associated with senior authors at their institutions. Future investigations should continue to evaluate the significance of gap years in medical education.

Meeting Presentation

A poster presentation took place from April 23rd to 27th, during the ARVO 2023 conference in New Orleans, LA.




Publication History

Received: 18 February 2023

Accepted: 10 August 2023

Article published online:
11 September 2023

© 2023. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Ophthalmology residency match summary report 2022. Accessed January 01, 2023 at: https://aupo.org/sites/default/files/2022-03/Feb%202022%20Oph%20Residency%20Match%20General%20Stats%20final.pdf
  • 2 Pathipati AS, Taleghani N. Research in medical school: a survey evaluating why medical students take research years. Cureus 2016; 8 (08) e741
  • 3 Bonilla-Velez J, Small M, Urrutia R, Lomberk G. The enduring value of research in medical education. Int J Med Stud 2017; 5 (01) 37-44
  • 4 Graduation Rates and Attrition Factors for U.S. Medical School Students. Accessed January 01, 2023 at: https://www.aamc.org/media/7566/download
  • 5 Srinivasan N, Zhou B, Taruvai V. et al. Catching Eyes: An Analysis of Medical Student Publications in the Ophthalmology Match. Presented at: ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract; June 2021 ; New Orleans
  • 6 Bargoud AR, Thangamathesvaran L, Patel VR, Henseler R, Kass W, Khouri AS. Quantifying the impact of research on matching into ophthalmology residency. J Acad Ophthalmol 2018; 10 (01) e133-e139
  • 7 Driver TH, Loh AR, Joseph D, Keenan JD, Naseri A. Predictors of matching in ophthalmology residency for international medical graduates. Ophthalmology 2014; 121 (04) 974-975.e2
  • 8 Stratman EJ, Ness RM. Factors associated with successful matching to dermatology residency programs by reapplicants and other applicants who previously graduated from medical school. Arch Dermatol 2011; 147 (02) 196-202
  • 9 Feinstein MM, Niforatos JD, Mosteller L, Chelnick D, Raza S, Otteson T. Association of Doximity ranking and residency program characteristics across 16 specialty training programs. J Grad Med Educ 2019; 11 (05) 580-584
  • 10 Wright-Chisem J, Cohn MR, Yang J, Osei D, Kogan M. Do medical students who participate in a research gap year produce more research during residency?. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev 2021; 5 (05) e21.00061
  • 11 Best Medical Schools: Research. U.S. News & World Report, Accessed January 01, 2023 at: https://www.usnews.com/best-graduate-schools/top-medical-schools/research-rankings
  • 12 Fuller C, Byrd JK, Groves M. Outcomes of reapplication to otolaryngology residency: a prospective cohort study. Ear Nose Throat J 2018; 97 (09) 324-328
  • 13 Sidiqi B, Gillespie EF, Wang C, Dawson M, Wu AJ. Mind the gap: an analysis of “gap year” prevalence, productivity, and perspectives among radiation oncology residency applicants. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2019; 104 (02) 456-462
  • 14 Skrzypczak T, Michałowicz J, Hossa M. et al. Publication times in ophthalmology journals: the story of accepted manuscripts. Cureus 2021; 13 (09) e17738
  • 15 Erlandson EE, Calhoun JG, Barrack FM. et al. Resident selection: applicant selection criteria compared with performance. Surgery 1982; 92 (02) 270-275
  • 16 Wickramasinghe DP, Perera CS, Senarathna S, Samarasekera DN. Patterns and trends of medical student research. BMC Med Educ 2013; 13: 175
  • 17 Dale JA, Schmitt CM, Crosby LA. Misrepresentation of research criteria by orthopaedic residency applicants. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1999; 81 (12) 1679-1681
  • 18 Baker DR, Jackson VP. Misrepresentation of publications by radiology residency applicants. Acad Radiol 2000; 7 (09) 727-729
  • 19 Grover M, Dharamshi F, Goveia C. Deception by applicants to family practice residencies. Fam Med 2001; 33 (06) 441-446
  • 20 Lee AG, Golnik KC, Oetting TA. et al. Re-engineering the resident applicant selection process in ophthalmology: a literature review and recommendations for improvement. Surv Ophthalmol 2008; 53 (02) 164-176
  • 21 Gudgel BM, Melson AT, Dvorak J, Ding K, Siatkowski RM. Correlation of ophthalmology residency application characteristics with subsequent performance in residency. J Acad Ophthalmol 2021; 13 (02) e151-e157
  • 22 Wolfson RK, Fairchild PC, Bahner I. et al. Residency Program Directors' Views on Research Conducted During Medical School: A National Survey. Acad Med. 2023; Apr 21 DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000005256. . Epub ahead of print. PMID: 37099328.