Endoscopy 2022; 54(07): E376-E377
DOI: 10.1055/a-1540-5870
E-Videos

Low-cost modified endoscopic vacuum therapy using a triple-lumen tube allows nutrition and drainage for treatment of an early post–bariatric surgery leak

1   Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology Department, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
,
1   Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology Department, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
,
1   Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology Department, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
,
Flaubert Sena de Medeiros
2   Surgery Division, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil
,
Thomas R. McCarty
3   Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy Division – Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
,
Christopher C. Thompson
3   Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy Division – Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
,
1   Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology Department, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
› Author Affiliations
 

Leaks after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) occur in up to 5 % of patients, with mortality rates approaching 4 % [1]. Among available therapies for leaks after bariatric surgery, endoscopic approaches have been shown to be safe and effective. Tissue sealants, cap-mounted clips, suturing, stents, a cardiac septal defect occluder, septotomy, endoscopic internal drainage with double pigtails, and endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) are the forefront of the therapeutic endoscopic arsenal [2] [3]. However, an individualized approach is needed to determine the best endoscopic treatment strategy for a given patient. In this video, we describe the successful treatment of a LSG leak using low-cost modified EVT.

A 30-year-old woman with class II obesity developed fever, nausea, and abdominal pain 14 days after LSG. Computed tomographic scan revealed a leak associated with a small contained collection adjacent to the staple line of the proximal stomach (angle of His). Underwater esophagogastroduodenoscopy was performed without air insufflation to avoid disrupting the collection ([Fig. 1]). The patient was treated with modified EVT using widely available triple-lumen tubing to allow for nutrition using the jejunal tube and EVT using the fenestrated portion of the tube ([Video 1]). The procedure was well tolerated and the patient remained on enteral nutrition as well as taking a liquid diet on the day following the procedure. External drainage was not required. After 15 days, imaging demonstrated resolution of the leak ([Fig. 2]), and the modified EVT system was removed ([Fig. 3]).

Zoom Image
Fig. 1 Underwater endoscopic visualization of the sleeve leak.

Video 1 Low-cost modified endoscopic vacuum therapy with a triple-lumen tube.


Quality:
Zoom Image
Fig. 2 Fluoroscopic imaging confirmed the success of leak treatment with the low-cost modified endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) system and demonstrated a significant improvement in the sleeve stenosis.
Zoom Image
Fig. 3 Complete healing of the leak after one session of the modified EVT treatment.

In summary, endoscopic drainage with this low-cost, modified EVT is a highly effective and safe technique for leaks [4] [5]. Furthermore, EVT obviates the need for external drainage and employs widely available materials. Ultimately, this low-cost modified EVT allows for nutrition and drainage with a single tube through the nares, enabling decreased procedure times, longer periods between EVT system exchanges, and fewer adverse events.

Endoscopy_UCTN_Code_TTT_1AO_2AI

Endoscopy E-Videos
https://eref.thieme.de/e-videos

Endoscopy E-Videos is an open access online section, reporting on interesting cases and new techniques in gastroenterological endoscopy. All papers include a high quality video and all contributions are freely accessible online. Processing charges apply (currently EUR 375), discounts and wavers acc. to HINARI are available.

This section has its own submission
website at
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/e-videos


#

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

  • References

  • 1 Hamid HKS, Emile SH, Saber AA. et al. Customized bariatric stents for sleeve gastrectomy leak: are they superior to conventional esophageal stents? A systematic review and proportion meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 2021; 35: 1025-1038
  • 2 de Moura DTH, Sachdev AH, Thompson CC. Endoscopic full-thickness defects and closure techniques. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol 2018; 16: 386-405
  • 3 do Monte Jr ES, de Moura DTH, Ribeiro IB. et al. Endoscopic vacuum therapy versus endoscopic stenting for upper gastrointestinal transmural defects: systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Endosc 2020; DOI: 10.1111/den.13813.
  • 4 Loske G, Schorsch T, Rucktaeschel F. et al. Open-pore film drainage (OFD): a new multipurpose tool for endoscopic negative pressure therapy (ENPT). Endosc Int Open 2018; 6: E865-E871
  • 5 de Moura DTH, de Moura BFBH, Manfredi MA. et al. Role of endoscopic vacuum therapy in the management of gastrointestinal transmural defects. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 11: 329-344

Corresponding author

Bruno Salomão Hirsch, MD
Av. Dr Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar, 225, 6º andar, bloco 3
Cerqueira César
05403-010 – São Paulo, SP
Brazil   

Publication History

Article published online:
09 August 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

  • References

  • 1 Hamid HKS, Emile SH, Saber AA. et al. Customized bariatric stents for sleeve gastrectomy leak: are they superior to conventional esophageal stents? A systematic review and proportion meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 2021; 35: 1025-1038
  • 2 de Moura DTH, Sachdev AH, Thompson CC. Endoscopic full-thickness defects and closure techniques. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol 2018; 16: 386-405
  • 3 do Monte Jr ES, de Moura DTH, Ribeiro IB. et al. Endoscopic vacuum therapy versus endoscopic stenting for upper gastrointestinal transmural defects: systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Endosc 2020; DOI: 10.1111/den.13813.
  • 4 Loske G, Schorsch T, Rucktaeschel F. et al. Open-pore film drainage (OFD): a new multipurpose tool for endoscopic negative pressure therapy (ENPT). Endosc Int Open 2018; 6: E865-E871
  • 5 de Moura DTH, de Moura BFBH, Manfredi MA. et al. Role of endoscopic vacuum therapy in the management of gastrointestinal transmural defects. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 11: 329-344

Zoom Image
Fig. 1 Underwater endoscopic visualization of the sleeve leak.
Zoom Image
Fig. 2 Fluoroscopic imaging confirmed the success of leak treatment with the low-cost modified endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) system and demonstrated a significant improvement in the sleeve stenosis.
Zoom Image
Fig. 3 Complete healing of the leak after one session of the modified EVT treatment.