CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Arquivos Brasileiros de Neurocirurgia: Brazilian Neurosurgery 2018; 37(S 01): S1-S332
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1672418
E-Poster – Anatomy & Approaches
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Predictors of Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Revision in Patients with Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus

Hugo Fialho
1   The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
,
Alice L. Hung
1   The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
,
Dane Moran
1   The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
,
Sharif Vakili
1   The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
,
Eric W. Sankey
1   The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
,
Ignacio Jusué-Torres
1   The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
,
Benjamin D. Elder
1   The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
,
Rory C. Goodwin
1   The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
,
Jennifer Lu
1   The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
,
Jamie Robison
1   The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
,
Daniele Rigamonti
1   The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
06 September 2018 (online)

 
 

    Introduction: Few studies have focused on predictive factors of ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt revision in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH).

    Objective: This study aims to determine whether comorbidities and baseline symptoms are associated with the need for shunt revision.

    Methods: A retrospective review of patients with iNPH treated with VP shunts by the senior author from 1993 to 2013 was conducted. Demographics and baseline symptoms were compared between patients with and without shunt revision. The need for revision, total number of revisions, and time to first revision were examined. Statistical analysis was performed using simple logistic, linear, and Poisson regression, and a multivariate analysis was performed.

    Results: A total of 347 patients with iNPH who received VP shunts were included. One hundred patients (28.8%) required shunt revision, with an average of 1.38 ± 0.76 revisions per patient. Mean time to revision was 19.2 ± 31.7 months. Gait and cognitive symptoms were associated with fewer revisions (incidence rate ratio, 0.45 and 0.67; p = 0.03 and 0.004, respectively). Headaches and urinary incontinence showed a greater time to revision (32.0 and 12.0 months; p = 0.014 and < 0.0005, respectively). Gait instability demonstrated decreased time to revision (p < 0.0005).

    Conclusions: Preoperative symptoms, such as headaches, gait instability, cognitive decline, and urinary incontinence, were significantly correlated with number of revisions and time to first revision. These factors should be considered during the initial counseling of prognosis for patients with iNPH receiving VP shunts.


    #

    No conflict of interest has been declared by the author(s).