J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2020; 81(S 01): S1-S272
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1702662
Poster Presentations
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Role of the Extradural Anterior Clinoidectomy to Approach the Paraclinoid Region Using Minimally Invasive Approaches: An Anatomic Study

Rafael Martinez-Perez
1   Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States
,
Thiago Albonette-Felicio
1   Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States
,
Giuliano Silveira-Bertazzo
1   Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States
,
Marcus Zachariah
1   Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States
,
Douglas Hardesty
1   Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States
,
Ricardo Carrau
1   Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States
,
Daniel Prevedello
1   Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
05 February 2020 (online)

 
 

    Background: The eAC is a standard technique that enhances the extradural corridor and provides a broad access to the entire parasellar region, while reducing brain retraction. However, its role in expanding the surgical corridor in minipterional approach has not been addressed yet.

    We sought to illustrate the microsurgical anatomy of the MPT + eAC and to evaluate the effect of eAC on surgical exposure and maneuverability along the paraclinoid region.

    Methods: Area of exposure, surgical freedom, and surgical maneuverability provided by the MPT and MPT + eAC along the paraclinoid region were compared in six cadaveric heads. The area of exposure was determined by the length and width of a pentagonal-shaped region defining the area of interest within the paraclinoid region. Area of surgical freedom and maneuverability were calculated at 4 points considered to be representative of the paraclinoid region (Optic chiasm, origin of the posterior communicating artery, origin of the ophthalmic artery, and internal carotid bifurcation).

    Results: In comparison to the MPT, the MPT + eAC enlarges the area of exposure in the paraclinoid region up to twofold (90 vs. 192 cm2, p < 0.001). Likewise, the MPT + eAC afforded a larger area of surgical freedom and better maneuverability at all selected targets in the paraclinoid area (p < 0.05).

    Conclusions: The evidence provided in this study establishes that the ACP affords improved surgical exposure and maneuverability when added to the MPT. The MPT offers a less invasive alternative to the traditional pterional or orbitozygomatic approach, while the eAC is a well stablished technique that overcomes some of the previous limitations of the standard MPT, improving surgical exposure and maneuverability within such narrow corridor.


    #

    No conflict of interest has been declared by the author(s).