Endoscopy 2020; 52(S 01): S222
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1704695
ESGE Days 2020 ePoster Podium presentations
Saturday, April 25, 2020 11:30 – 12:00 Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) ePoster Podium 6 and duodenal polyps
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

PERCUTANEUS ENDOSCOPIC GASTROSTOMY (PEG). SUCCESSFUL PLACEMENT AND COMPLICATION RATES. A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY CONDUCTED AT A TETRIARY CENTER

C Pontas
Evangelismos, Ophthalmiatreion Athinon and Polyclinic Hospitals, Gastroenterology, Athens, Greece
,
G Karampekos
Evangelismos, Ophthalmiatreion Athinon and Polyclinic Hospitals, Gastroenterology, Athens, Greece
,
F Gkeros
Evangelismos, Ophthalmiatreion Athinon and Polyclinic Hospitals, Gastroenterology, Athens, Greece
,
E Tsoukali
Evangelismos, Ophthalmiatreion Athinon and Polyclinic Hospitals, Gastroenterology, Athens, Greece
,
C Chantzievangelinou
Evangelismos, Ophthalmiatreion Athinon and Polyclinic Hospitals, Gastroenterology, Athens, Greece
,
G Filippidis
Evangelismos, Ophthalmiatreion Athinon and Polyclinic Hospitals, Gastroenterology, Athens, Greece
,
M Vraka
Evangelismos, Ophthalmiatreion Athinon and Polyclinic Hospitals, Gastroenterology, Athens, Greece
,
A Tsatsa
Evangelismos, Ophthalmiatreion Athinon and Polyclinic Hospitals, Gastroenterology, Athens, Greece
,
L Varytimiadis
Evangelismos, Ophthalmiatreion Athinon and Polyclinic Hospitals, Gastroenterology, Athens, Greece
,
A Tsigaridas
Evangelismos, Ophthalmiatreion Athinon and Polyclinic Hospitals, Gastroenterology, Athens, Greece
,
E Archavlis
Evangelismos, Ophthalmiatreion Athinon and Polyclinic Hospitals, Gastroenterology, Athens, Greece
,
N Viazis
Evangelismos, Ophthalmiatreion Athinon and Polyclinic Hospitals, Gastroenterology, Athens, Greece
,
G Mantzaris
Evangelismos, Ophthalmiatreion Athinon and Polyclinic Hospitals, Gastroenterology, Athens, Greece
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
23 April 2020 (online)

 
 

    Aims Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy(PEG)is an endoscopic procedure aiming to create a stoma in order to facilitate the delivering of water and nutrients to the small intestine when oral feeding is impossible or contraindicated.The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness and safety of PEG formation in our center.

    Methods This was a retrospective study on prospectively acquired data regarding the success and safety of PEG procedures in our center between January 2015 and December 2018.The study includes patients hospitalized for various medical conditions or admitted in order to place a PEG to restore intestinal nutrition. Detailed data from PEG placement were retrieved from the hospital´s electronic recording system.The procedure was executed by experienced endoscopic staff(endoscopists and nurses)of our department assisted by specialized medical staff(ICU doctors,nurses,anesthesiologists,and surgeons)on a case to case base.The pull-through technique was used with a PEG diameter of 24Fr.Patients were excluded from this study when the outcome of the PEG endoscopic procedure was unknown after 7 days.

    Results In total,203 PEGs were placed.145(71.4%)patients were men with median age 61.7 years and 58 were women(28.6%)with median age 65.3 years.The main reasons for PEG placement were:Νeurological and neurodegenerative diseases(dementia,multiple sclerosis,stroke,motor neuron disease,etc)in 124/203(61.2%)cases;malignant diseases(neck,larynx,tongue,brain, hematological diseases,etc)ιn 34/203(16.7%)cases;head injuries(road accidents,falls)in 24/203(11.8%)cases;prolonged hospitalization in Intensive Care Units for various reasons(sepsis,aspiration,cardiac arrest,central nervous system infections,suicidal attempts,postoperative complications,burns,etc)in 21/203(10.3%)cases.The rate of successful PEG placement was 92.1%(187/203).Placement of PEG failed in 16 cases:Ιnability to locate a suitable insertion spot 12/16(75%)cases,desaturation of the patient during sedation 3/16(18.75%)cases,and due to a tracheo-esophageal fistula one(6.25%)patient.One patient died within 2 days after PEG placement.Serious complications occurred in 4 patients within 7 days after insertion.Aspiration pneumonia 3/203(1.5%)and bleeding 1/203(0.5%)patient.11/203 patients(5.4%)experienced minor complications:trauma infection or leak of the stoma[4(2%)and3/203(1.5%)patients],unintentional PEG removal[3/203(1.5%)]and obstruction[1/203(0.5%)].

    Conclusions PEG placement has high success and safety rates when performed with careful patient selection and close collaboration of specialised personnel.


    #