CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Laryngorhinootologie 2020; 99(S 02): S167-S168
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1711038
Abstracts
Oncology

Prognostic impact of additional HPV-typing in p16-stratified advanced oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma

BG. Weiss
1   Klinik und Poliklinik für Hals-Nasen-Ohrenheilkunde, Klinikum der Universität München, LMU München München
,
Mahalia Zoe Anczykowski
2   Klinik für Hals-Nasen-Ohrenheilkunde, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen Göttingen
,
M Canis
1   Klinik und Poliklinik für Hals-Nasen-Ohrenheilkunde, Klinikum der Universität München, LMU München München
,
F Ihler
1   Klinik und Poliklinik für Hals-Nasen-Ohrenheilkunde, Klinikum der Universität München, LMU München München
,
J Kitz
4   Institut für Pathologie, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen Göttingen
,
M Jakob
1   Klinik und Poliklinik für Hals-Nasen-Ohrenheilkunde, Klinikum der Universität München, LMU München München
› Author Affiliations
 
 

    Background p16 is considered as surrogate marker for the identification of human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCCs)

    Methods: 102 patients with advanced stage (III - IVa) OPSCCs treated primarily by transoral lasermicrosurgery were included. p16- and HPV-status were evaluated by immunohistochemistry and genotyping, respectively, and analyzed for their stand alone or combined prognostic association.

    Conclusions In contrast to p16, the HPV-status resulted in no significant survival discrepancies (five-year overall survival (OS) HPVpos 65 % vs. HPVneg 79 %, P = 0.462; p16pos 83 % vs. p16neg 63 %, P = 0.019). Combining both markers, p16pos (p16pos/HPVpos, p16pos/HPVneg) and p16neg/HPVneg groups demonstrated comparable high survival (OS 78 % vs. 86 % vs. 74 %). Lowest survival was observed for patients with p16neg/HPVpos OPSCCs (OS 41 %, P = 0.016).

    Considering further tobacco consumption, never smoking patients with p16pos OPSCCs demonstrated the highest survival, whereas within former/current smokers with p16pos and p16neg disease it was comparable low (OS 90 % vs. 63 % vs. 57 %, P = 0.012).

    Conclusion p16- and HPV-status should not be considered as equivalent markers for a better prognosis. Furthermore, patient associated factors like smoking should be included in clinical evaluation.

    Poster-PDF A-1776.PDF


    #
    Bernhard G. Weiss
    Klinik und Poliklinik für Hals-Nasen-Ohrenheilkunde, Klinikum der Universität München, LMU München
    Marchioninistr. 15
    81377 München

    Publication History

    Article published online:
    10 June 2020

    © 2020. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

    © Georg Thieme Verlag KG
    Stuttgart · New York