Endoscopy 2005; 37(9): 923
DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-870333
Unusual Cases and Technical Notes
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Reading of Capsule Endoscopy Images Significantly Improved

U.  Seitz1 , Y.  M.  Naga1 , S.  Bohnacker1 , S.  Seewald1 , N.  Soehendra1
  • 1Department of Interdisciplinary Endoscopy, University Hospital Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
Further Information

U. Seitz, M. D.

Department of Interdisciplinary Endoscopy
University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf
University of Hamburg

Martinistraße 52
20246 Hamburg
Germany

Fax: + 49-40-428034420

Email: seitz@uke.uni-hamburg.de

Publication History

Publication Date:
16 May 2006 (online)

Table of Contents

    Capsule endoscopy (Given Imaging, Yoqneam, Israel) allows for small-bowel assessment with little discomfort for the patient. However, evaluation is still a challenge for the investigator. Unlike flexible endoscopy where the examiner is actively involved in maneuvering the instruments, browsing more than 50 000 images in capsule endoscopy can be a monotonous procedure. We added a “jog/shuttle” control, which is a well-established tool in professional video editing, to the Given Imaging capsule endoscopy reading system.

    Zoom Image

    Figure 1 Configuration of the jog/shuttle control.

    Zoom Image

    Figure 2 Placing the jog/shuttle control on the left and the mouse on the right side appeared to be the most practical solution.

    The jog/shuttle control (Contour Design, Inc. Windham, New Hampshire, USA) was connected to the USB port. The inner ring or “jog” rotates through 360° and provides precision frame-by-frame control. The outer ring or “shuttle” is rubberized and spring-loaded, and was configured to control browsing speed; seven different frame speeds could be obtained, according to the torque applied. Turning right or left moved the video forward and backward. Additional buttons were configured as shown in Figure [1].

    Volunteer doctors evaluated two training videos for 5 : 30 minutes each, with randomization of the order of the two videos and the order of evaluation with and without the jog/shuttle control.

    Preliminary evaluation of the first 12 volunteers did not show improvement in the detection rate with use of the jog/shuttle control. However, overall, 25 % more images were reviewed. In a questionnaire examiners reported that they found capsule endoscopy evaluation significantly easier with the jog/shuttle control (P = 0.005), they felt significantly more actively involved (P = 0.002), and preferred the addition of the jog/shuttle control significantly (P = 0.002).

    Using the jog/shuttle control with the left hand and the mouse with the right hand (Figure [2]) was found to be the most practical solution in the evaluation of three complete cases.

    Our preliminary results indicate an advantage in the use of a jog/shuttle control for capsule endoscopy evaluation.

    Endoscopy_UCTN_Code_TTT_1AP_2AB

      U. Seitz, M. D.

      Department of Interdisciplinary Endoscopy
      University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf
      University of Hamburg

      Martinistraße 52
      20246 Hamburg
      Germany

      Fax: + 49-40-428034420

      Email: seitz@uke.uni-hamburg.de

        U. Seitz, M. D.

        Department of Interdisciplinary Endoscopy
        University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf
        University of Hamburg

        Martinistraße 52
        20246 Hamburg
        Germany

        Fax: + 49-40-428034420

        Email: seitz@uke.uni-hamburg.de

        Zoom Image

        Figure 1 Configuration of the jog/shuttle control.

        Zoom Image

        Figure 2 Placing the jog/shuttle control on the left and the mouse on the right side appeared to be the most practical solution.