Download PDF
ergopraxis 2022; 15(06): 17-21
DOI: 10.1055/a-1768-9331
Therapie

Betätigen mit neuester Technik – Prothesen mit myoelektrischer Mustererkennung

Susanne Breier
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

Die Verwendung einer myoelektrischen Prothese für die obere Extremität ersetzt wichtige Bewegungsabläufe und gewährleistet so die Selbstversorgung, eine Rückkehr ins Arbeitsleben und die gesellschaftliche Teilhabe im Sinne der ICF. Susanne Breier beschreibt den Versorgungsprozess mit den Prothesen und wie Klient*innen den Umgang mit ihnen erlernen.



Publication History

Article published online:
01 June 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • Literaturverzeichnis

  • 1 Ison M, Artemiadis P. The role of muscle synergies in myoelectric control: trends and challenges for simultaneous multifunction control. J Neural Eng 2014; 11(5):. 051001RESNIK PAPER13
  • 2 Auer M, Popovic I, Amsüß S.. „Myo Plus“: innovatives Steuerkonzept für transradiale myoelektrische Armprothesen. Orthopädie Technik 2019; 70 (08) 30-34
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 3 Hahne JM, Schweisfurth MA, Müller KR, Farina D. Eine Simultansteuerung für myoelektrische Handprothesen. Orthopädie Technik 2016; 67 (03) 34-39
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 4 Göbel PM, Kalmar J, van Vliet HW. Pattern Recognition – Funktionsverbesserung bei der Ansteuerung moderner Armprothesen. Orthopädie Technik 2015; 66 (06) 52-59
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 5 Graupe D, Beex AA, Monlux WJ, Magnussen I. A multifunctional prosthesis control system based on time series identification of EMG signals using microprocessors. Bull Prosthet Res 1977; 10 (27) 4-16
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Ramachandran VS. et al The perception of phantom limbs: The D. O. Hebb lecture. Brain 1998; 121 (09) 1605-1630
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Moseley GL. et al Interdependence of movement and anatomy persist when amputees learn a physiologically impossible movement of their phantom limb. PNAS 2009; 106 (44) 18798-18802
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Ortiz-Catalan M, Sander N, Kristoffersen MB, Håkansson B, Brånemark R. Treatment of phantom limb pain (PLP) based on augmented reality and gaming controlled by myoelectric pattern recognition: a case study of a chronic PLP patient. Neuroprosthetics 2014; 08: 24
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 9 Simon AM, Lock BA, Stubblefield KA.. Patient training for functional use of pattern recognition-controlled prostheses. JPO 2012; 24 (02) 56-64
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 10 Stubblefield K, Finucane SB, Miller LA, Lock BA.. Training individuals to use pattern recognition to control an upper limb prosthesis. Fredericton, New Brunswick. Canada: Myoelectric Controls Symposium; 2011: 170-173
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 11 Scheme E, Fougner A, Stavdahl O. et al Examining the adverse effects of limb position on pattern recognition based myoelectric control. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2010; 2010: 6337-6340
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 12 Atkins D.. Adult upper limb prosthetic training. In: Bowker HK, Michael JW, Eds. Atlas of limb prosthetics: surgical, prosthetic, and rehabilitation principles. 2nd rev. ed.Rosemont: American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons 2002: 277-291
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Widehammar C, LidströmHolmqvist K, Hermansson L. Training for users of myoelectric multigrip hand prostheses: a scoping review. Prosthetics and Orthotics International 2021; 45 (05) 393-400
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Young AJ, Hargrove LJ, Kuiken TA. The effects of electrode size and orientation on the sensitivity of myoelectric pattern recognition systems to electrode shift. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2011; 58: 2537-25448
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Lock B, Simon AM, Stubblefield KA, Hargrove LJ. Prosthesis-Guided Training for Practical Use of Pattern Recognition Control of Prostheses. Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada: Myoelectric Controls Symposium;; 2011: 61-64
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 16 Breier S. Myoelektrische Teilhandprothesen. Et Reha 2020; 59 (04) 20-24
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 17 Burgerhof JG, Vasluian E, Dijkstra P, Bongers RM, van der Sluis CK. The Southampton Hand Assessment Procedure revisited: A transparent lin-ear scoring system, applied to data of experienced. J Hand Ther 2017; 30 (01) 49-57
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Hermansson LM, Fisher AG, Bernspång B, Eliasson AC.. Assessment of capacity for myoelectric control: a new rasch-built measure of prosthetic hand control. J Rehabil Med 2005; 37 (03) 166-171
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Li G, Schultz AE, Kuiken TA. Quantifying pattern recognition-based myoelectric control of multifunctional transradial prostheses. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2010; 18 (02) 185-192
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Simon AM, Hargrove LJ, Lock BA, Kuiken TA. Target Achievement Control Test: evaluating real-time myoelectric pattern-recognition control of multifunctional upper-limb prostheses. J Rehabil Res Dev 2011; 48 (06) 619-627
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 WHO/DIMDI. Internationale Klassifikation der Funktionsfähigkeit, Behinderung und Gesundheit (ICF) der Weltgesundheitsorganisation (WHO)(2005)