Download PDF
Am J Perinatol 2024; 41(S 01): e794-e802
DOI: 10.1055/a-1941-4285
Original Article

Trial of Therapy on Trial: Inconsistent Thresholds for Discussing Withdrawal of Life-Sustaining Therapies in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

Jacqueline Meadow 
1   Division of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan, C.S. Mott Children's Hospital, Ann Arbor, Michigan
,
Jennifer Arzu
2   Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
,
Karen Rychlik
3   Department of Pediatrics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
,
Natalia Henner
4   Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
5   Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
› Author Affiliations Funding None.
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective This study aimed to establish the degree of variability in thresholds for discussing withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies (WLST) in periviable infants among neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) personnel.

Study Design A vignette-style survey was administered to NICU personnel at two urban NICUs assessing likelihood of discussing WLST or support for discussing WLST (on a scale from 1, not at all likely/supportive to 10, extremely likely/supportive) in 10 clinical scenarios.

Results Response rates ranged by clinical role from 26 to 89%. Participant responses ranged from 1 to 10 in 5 out of 10 vignettes for NICU attendings, and 9 out of 10 vignettes for bedside nurses. Lower gestational age (22–23 vs. 24–25 weeks) was associated with increased likelihood to discuss WLST in some but not all scenarios.

Conclusion NICU personnel have widely variable criteria for discussing WLST which threatens the informed consent process surrounding resuscitation decisions in a “trial of therapy” framework.

Key Points

  • NICU personnel have variable criteria for WLST.

  • Parents have little say in whether WLST is offered.

  • Disclosure of variable criteria is not routine.

Keywords

neonatology - pediatrics - withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies - bioethics - trial of therapy - periviability

Authors' Contributions

J.M. was responsible for designing the study protocol, conducting the survey, interpreting results, making tables and figures, and primary writing of the manuscript. J.A. and K.R. were responsible for analyzing data, assisted with interpreting results, and provided feedback on the manuscript. N.H. was responsible for designing the study with J.M. and contributed to writing the manuscript.


Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 02 August 2022

Accepted: 06 September 2022

Accepted Manuscript online:
12 September 2022

Article published online:
07 December 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Martin JAHB, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJK. Births in the United States, 2018. NCHS Data Brief 2019; (346) 1-8
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Glass HC, Costarino AT, Stayer SA, Brett CM, Cladis F, Davis PJ. Outcomes for extremely premature infants. Anesth Analg 2015; 120 (06) 1337-1351
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Martin JAHB, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJK, Driscoll AK. Births: final data for 2018. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2019; 68 (13) 1-47
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Teune MJ, Bakhuizen S, Gyamfi Bannerman C. et al. A systematic review of severe morbidity in infants born late preterm. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 205 (04) 374.e1-374.e9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Mercer BM. Periviable birth and the shifting limit of viability. Clin Perinatol 2017; 44 (02) 283-286
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Patel RM, Rysavy MA, Bell EF, Tyson JE. Survival of infants born at periviable gestational ages. Clin Perinatol 2017; 44 (02) 287-303
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Singh J, Fanaroff J, Andrews B. et al. Resuscitation in the “gray zone” of viability: determining physician preferences and predicting infant outcomes. Pediatrics 2007; 120 (03) 519-526
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Singh J, Lantos J, Meadow W. End-of-life after birth: death and dying in a neonatal intensive care unit. Pediatrics 2004; 114 (06) 1620-1626
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Weiner J, Sharma J, Lantos J, Kilbride H. How infants die in the neonatal intensive care unit: trends from 1999 through 2008. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2011; 165 (07) 630-634
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Wilkinson DJ, Fitzsimons JJ, Dargaville PA. et al. Death in the neonatal intensive care unit: changing patterns of end of life care over two decades. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2006; 91 (04) F268-F271
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Michel MC, Colaizy TT, Klein JM, Segar JL, Bell EF. Causes and circumstances of death in a neonatal unit over 20 years. Pediatr Res 2018; 83 (04) 829-833
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Tyson JE, Parikh NA, Langer J, Green C, Higgins RD. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network. Intensive care for extreme prematurity–moving beyond gestational age. N Engl J Med 2008; 358 (16) 1672-1681
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Meadow W, Lagatta J, Andrews B. et al. Just, in time: ethical implications of serial predictions of death and morbidity for ventilated premature infants. Pediatrics 2008; 121 (04) 732-740
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Andrews B, Myers P, Lagatta J, Meadow W. A comparison of prenatal and postnatal models to predict outcomes at the border of viability. J Pediatr 2016; 173: 96-100
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Meadow W, Meadow X, Tanz RR, Lagatta J, Lantos J. The value of a trial of therapy - football as a ‘proof-of-concept’. Acta Paediatr 2011; 100 (02) 167-169
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Dworetz AR, Natarajan G, Langer J. et al; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health, Human Development Neonatal Research Network. Withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining treatment in extremely low gestational age neonates. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2021; 106 (03) 238-243
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Arnolds M, Xu L, Hughes P, McCoy J, Meadow W. Worth a try? Describing the experiences of families during the course of care in the neonatal intensive care unit when the prognosis is poor. J Pediatr 2018; 196: 116-122.e3
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Feltman DM, Du H, Leuthner SR. Survey of neonatologists' attitudes toward limiting life-sustaining treatments in the neonatal intensive care unit. J Perinatol 2012; 32 (11) 886-892
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Fry JT, Matoba N, Datta A. et al; Children's Hospital Neonatal Consortium (CHNC). Center, gestational age, and race impact end-of-life care practices at regional neonatal intensive care units. J Pediatr 2020; 217: 86-91.e1
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Watkins PL, Dagle JM, Bell EF, Colaizy TT. Outcomes at 18 to 22 months of corrected age for infants born at 22 to 25 weeks of gestation in a center practicing active management. J Pediatr 2020; 217: 52-58.e1
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Rysavy MA, Li L, Bell EF. et al; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network. Between-hospital variation in treatment and outcomes in extremely preterm infants. N Engl J Med 2015; 372 (19) 1801-1811
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Backes CH, Söderström F, Ågren J. et al. Outcomes following a comprehensive versus a selective approach for infants born at 22 weeks of gestation. J Perinatol 2019; 39 (01) 39-47
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Lawrence C, Laventhal N, Fritz KA. et al. Ethical cultures in perinatal care: do they exist? Correlation of provider attitudes with periviability practices at six centers. Am J Perinatol 2021; 38 (S 01): e193-e200
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Delgado-Guay MO, Hui D, Parsons HA. et al. Spirituality, religiosity, and spiritual pain in advanced cancer patients. J Pain Symptom Manage 2011; 41 (06) 986-994
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Janvier A, Farlow B, Baardsnes J, Pearce R, Barrington KJ. Measuring and communicating meaningful outcomes in neonatology: a family perspective. Semin Perinatol 2016; 40 (08) 571-577
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Kukora SK, Boss RD. Values-based shared decision-making in the antenatal period. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2018; 23 (01) 17-24
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar