PDF herunterladen
Semin intervent Radiol 2016; 33(01): 003-005
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1571804
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Peritoneal Dialysis

Mohammed Al-Natour
1   Department of Radiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
,
Dustin Thompson
1   Department of Radiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
22. März 2016 (online)

Auch verfügbar auf
    Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Peritoneal dialysis is becoming more important in the management of patients with end-stage renal disease. Because of the efforts of the “Fistula First Breakthrough Initiative,” dialysis venous access in the United States has become focused on promoting arteriovenous fistula creation and reducing the number of patients who start dialysis with a tunneled catheter. This is important because tunneled catheters can lead to infection, endocarditis, and early loss of more long-term access. When planned for, peritoneal dialysis can offer patients the opportunity to start dialysis at home without jeopardizing central access or the possibilities of eventual arteriovenous fistula creation. The purpose of this review is to highlight the indications, contraindications, and procedural methods for implanting peritoneal dialysis catheters in the interventional radiology suite.

Keywords

peritoneal dialysis - peritoneal catheters - percutaneous placement - fluoroscopic guidance - interventional radiology
 

  • References

  • 1 Palmer RA. As it was in the beginning: a history of peritoneal dialysis. Perit Dial Int 1982; 2: 16-22
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 2 Odel HM, Ferris DO, Power MH. Peritoneal lavage as an effective means of extrarenal excretion; a clinical appraisal. Am J Med 1950; 9 (1) 63-77
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 3 Saran R, Li Y, Robinson B , et al. US Renal Data System 2014 annual data report: epidemiology of kidney disease in the United States. Am J Kidney Dis 2015; 66 (1) (Suppl. 01) S1-S305
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 4 Fenton SS, Schaubel DE, Desmeules M , et al. Hemodialysis versus peritoneal dialysis: a comparison of adjusted mortality rates. Am J Kidney Dis 1997; 30 (3) 334-342
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 5 Abdel-Aal AK, Dybbro P, Hathaway P, Guest S, Neuwirth M, Krishnamurthy V. Best practices consensus protocol for peritoneal dialysis catheter placement by interventional radiologists. Perit Dial Int 2014; 34 (5) 481-493
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 6 Narayan R, Fried T, Chica G, Schaefer M, Mullins D. Minimally invasive fluoroscopic percutaneous peritoneal dialysis catheter salvage. Clin Kidney J 2014; 7 (3) 264-268
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 7 Maher E, Wolley MJ, Abbas SA, Hawkins SP, Marshall MR. Fluoroscopic versus laparoscopic implantation of peritoneal dialysis catheters: a retrospective cohort study. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2014; 25 (6) 895-903
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 8 Voss D, Hawkins S, Poole G, Marshall M. Radiological versus surgical implantation of first catheter for peritoneal dialysis: a randomized non-inferiority trial. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2012; 27 (11) 4196-4204
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar