PDF herunterladen
Am J Perinatol 2024; 41(S 01): e1091-e1098
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1760431
Original Article

Factors Associated with Transfer Distance from Birth Hospital to Repair Hospital for First Surgical Repair among Infants with Myelomeningocele in California

Vijaya Kancherla
1   Department of Epidemiology, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, Georgia
,
Chen Ma
2   Division of Neonatal and Developmental Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
,
Neha J. Purkey
3   Division of Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
,
Susan R. Hintz
2   Division of Neonatal and Developmental Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
4   California Perinatal Quality Care Collaborative, Stanford, California
,
Henry C. Lee 
2   Division of Neonatal and Developmental Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
4   California Perinatal Quality Care Collaborative, Stanford, California
,
Gerald Grant
5   Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
,
Suzan L. Carmichael
2   Division of Neonatal and Developmental Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
6   Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stanford University, Stanford, California
› Institutsangaben Funding This study received its financial support from the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (grant number: R01 MD007796).
› Weitere Informationen
Auch verfügbar auf
    Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Objective The objective of our study was to examine factors associated with distance to care for first surgical repair among infants with myelomeningocele in California.

Study Design A total of 677 eligible cases with complete geocoded data were identified for birth years 2006 to 2012 using data from the California Perinatal Quality Care Collaborative linked to hospital and vital records. The median distance from home to birth hospital among eligible infants was 9 miles, and from birth hospital to repair hospital was 15 miles. We limited our analysis to infants who lived close to the birth hospital, creating two study groups to examine transfer distance patterns: “lived close and had a short transfer” (i.e., lived <9 miles from birth hospital and traveled <15 miles from birth hospital to repair hospital; n = 92), and “lived close and had a long transfer” (i.e., lived <9 miles from birth hospital and traveled ≥15 miles from birth hospital to repair hospital; n = 96). Log-binomial regression was used to estimate crude and adjusted risk ratios (aRRs and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Selected maternal, infant, and birth hospital characteristics were compared between the two groups.

Results We found that low birth weight (aRR = 1.44; 95% CI = 1.04, 1.99) and preterm birth (aRR = 1.41; 95% CI = 1.01, 1.97) were positively associated, whereas initiating prenatal care early in the first trimester was inversely associated (aRR = 0.64; 95% CI = 0.46, 0.89) with transferring a longer distance (≥15 miles) from birth hospital to repair hospital. No significant associations were noted by maternal race-ethnicity, socioeconomic indicators, or the level of hospital care at the birth hospital.

Conclusion Our study identified selected infant factors associated with the distance to access surgical care for infants with myelomeningocele who had to transfer from birth hospital to repair hospital. Distance-based barriers to care should be identified and optimized when planning deliveries of at-risk infants in other populations.

Key Points

  • Low birth weight predicted long hospital transfer distance.

  • Preterm birth was associated with transfer distance.

  • Prenatal care was associated with transfer distance.

Keywords

access to health service - California - distance - care disparity - myelomeningocele - open spina bifida

Supplementary Material



Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 24. März 2022

Angenommen: 28. November 2022

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
16. Januar 2023

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Williams J, Mai CT, Mulinare J. et al; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Updated estimates of neural tube defects prevented by mandatory folic Acid fortification—United States, 1995-2011. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2015; 64 (01) 1-5
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Botto LD, Moore CA, Khoury MJ, Erickson JD. Neural-tube defects. N Engl J Med 1999; 341 (20) 1509-1519
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Alabi NB, Thibadeau J, Wiener JS. et al. Surgeries and health outcomes among patients with spina bifida. Pediatrics 2018; 142 (03) e20173730
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Bakaniene I, Prasauskiene A, Vaiciene-Magistris N. Health-related quality of life in children with myelomeningocele: a systematic review of the literature. Child Care Health Dev 2016; 42 (05) 625-643
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 McCarthy DJ, Sheinberg DL, Luther E, McCrea HJ. Myelomeningocele-associated hydrocephalus: nationwide analysis and systematic review. Neurosurg Focus 2019; 47 (04) E5
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Parker SE, Yazdy MM, Mitchell AA, Demmer LA, Werler MM. A description of spina bifida cases and co-occurring malformations, 1976-2011. Am J Med Genet A 2014; 164A (02) 432-440
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Shin M, Kucik JE, Siffel C. et al. Improved survival among children with spina bifida in the United States. J Pediatr 2012; 161 (06) 1132-1137
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Wang Y, Hu J, Druschel CM, Kirby RS. Twenty-five-year survival of children with birth defects in New York State: a population-based study. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 2011; 91 (12) 995-1003
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Bowman RM, McLone DG, Grant JA, Tomita T, Ito JA. Spina bifida outcome: a 25-year prospective. Pediatr Neurosurg 2001; 34 (03) 114-120
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Bol KA, Collins JS, Kirby RS. National Birth Defects Prevention Network. Survival of infants with neural tube defects in the presence of folic acid fortification. Pediatrics 2006; 117 (03) 803-813
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Kancherla V, Druschel CM, Oakley Jr GP. Population-based study to determine mortality in spina bifida: New York State Congenital Malformations Registry, 1983 to 2006. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 2014; 100 (08) 563-575
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Wang Y, Hu J, Druschel CM. A retrospective cohort study of mortality among children with birth defects in New York State, 1983-2006. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 2010; 88 (12) 1023-1031
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Alford EN, Hopson BD, Safyanov F. et al. Care management and contemporary challenges in spina bifida: a practice preference survey of the American Society of Pediatric Neurosurgeons. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2019; (e-pub ahead of print). DOI: 10.3171/2019.5.PEDS18738.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Practice Bulletin No. Practice Bulletin No. 187: Neural Tube Defects. Obstet Gynecol 2017; 130 (06) e279-e290
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Spina Bifida Association. . 2018 Guidelines for the care of people with spina bifida. Accessed July 6, 2021 at: https://www.spinabifidaassociation.org/resource/guidelinespdfull/
    PubMed
  • 16 Watson JC, Tye G, Ward JD. Delayed repair of myelomeningoceles. World Neurosurg 2014; 81 (02) 428-430
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Harris DA, Cherian J, LoPresti M, Jea A, Lam S. Trends in epidemiology and hospitalization utilization for myelomeningocele repair from 2000 to 2009. Childs Nerv Syst 2016; 32 (07) 1273-1279
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Fixler DE, Nembhard WN, Xu P, Ethen MK, Canfield MA. Effect of acculturation and distance from cardiac center on congenital heart disease mortality. Pediatrics 2012; 129 (06) 1118-1124
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Brown ZD, Bey AK, Bonfield CM. et al. Racial disparities in health care access among pediatric patients with craniosynostosis. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2016; 18 (03) 269-274
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Cassell CH, Krohmer A, Mendez DD, Lee KA, Strauss RP, Meyer RE. Factors associated with distance and time traveled to cleft and craniofacial care. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 2013; 97 (10) 685-695
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Welke KF, Pasquali SK, Lin P. et al. Hospital distribution and patient travel patterns for congenital cardiac surgery in the United States. Ann Thorac Surg 2019; 107 (02) 574-581
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Yeager SB, Horbar JD, Greco KM, Duff J, Thiagarajan RR, Laussen PC. Pretransport and posttransport characteristics and outcomes of neonates who were admitted to a cardiac intensive care unit. Pediatrics 2006; 118 (03) 1070-1077
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Radcliff E, Delmelle E, Kirby RS, Laditka SB, Correia J, Cassell CH. Factors associated with travel time and distance to access hospital care among infants with spina bifida. Matern Child Health J 2016; 20 (01) 205-217
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Kancherla V, Ma C, Grant G. et al. Factors associated with timeliness of surgical repair among infants with myelomeningocele: California Perinatal Quality Care Collaborative, 2006 to 2011. Am J Perinatol 2020; 37 (12) 1234-1242
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Eberth JM, Kramer MR, Delmelle EM, Kirby RS. What is the place for space in epidemiology?. Ann Epidemiol 2021; 64: 41-46
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Kirby RS, Delmelle E, Eberth JM. Advances in spatial epidemiology and geographic information systems. Ann Epidemiol 2017; 27 (01) 1-9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Kelly C, Hulme C, Farragher T, Clarke G. Are differences in travel time or distance to healthcare for adults in global north countries associated with an impact on health outcomes? A systematic review. BMJ Open 2016; 6 (11) e013059
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Guidelines for Perinatal Care, 5th ed. Elk Grove Village, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics; 2002
    Google Scholar
  • 29 McEvoy CS, Ross-Li D, Held JM. et al. Geographic distance to pediatric surgical care within the continental United States. J Pediatr Surg 2019; 54 (06) 1112-1117
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Becerra BJ, Arias D, Becerra MB. Low health literacy among immigrant Hispanics. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities 2017; 4 (03) 480-483
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Sealy-Jefferson S, Vickers J, Elam A, Wilson MR. Racial and ethnic health disparities and the affordable care act: a status update. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities 2015; 2 (04) 583-588
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Richardson LD, Norris M. Access to health and health care: how race and ethnicity matter. Mt Sinai J Med 2010; 77 (02) 166-177
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Manuel JI. Racial/ethnic and gender disparities in health care use and access. Health Serv Res 2018; 53 (03) 1407-1429
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Rocque BG, Hopson BD, Blount JP. Caring for the child with spina bifida. Pediatr Clin North Am 2021; 68 (04) 915-927
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Blount JP, Bowman R, Dias MS, Hopson B, Partington MD, Rocque BG. Neurosurgery guidelines for the care of people with spina bifida. J Pediatr Rehabil Med 2020; 13 (04) 467-477
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar