PDF herunterladen
ZWR - Das Deutsche Zahnärzteblatt 2019; 128(10): 501-509
DOI: 10.1055/a-1011-7974
Fortbildung | Zahnerhaltung
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Wurzelkaries – kennen, erkennen, erfolgreich therapieren

Konstantin J. Scholz
,
Wolfgang Buchalla
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
24. Oktober 2019 (online)

Auch verfügbar auf
   Lizenzen und Reprints

Wurzelkaries ist im Kontext des demografischen Wandels eine zunehmende Herausforderung für den Zahnarzt. Dieser Beitrag soll dem Leser nützliche Informationen zu Pathogenese, Prävention und Therapieoptionen an die Hand geben.
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Sumney DL, Jordan HV, Englander HR. The Prevalence of Root Surface Caries in Selected Populations. J Periodontol 1973; 44: 500-504
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Takahashi N, Nyvad B. Ecological Hypothesis of Dentin and Root Caries. Caries Res 2016; 50: 422-431
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Damé-Teixeira N, Parolo CCF, Maltz M. Specificities of Caries on Root Surface. Monogr Oral Sci 2017; 26: 15-25
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Jordan AR, Micheelis W. Fünfte Deutsche Mundgesundheitsstudie (DMS V). Köln: Deutscher Zahnärzteverlag; 2016
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Hayes M, Burke F, Allen PF. Etiology, Risk Factors and Groups of Risk. Monogr Oral Sci 2017; 26: 9-14
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Henriques PG, Okajima LS, Siqueira S. Surgical reconstruction of the interdental papilla: 2 case reports. Gen Dent 2018; 66: e1-e4
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Papas AS, Joshi A, Palmer CA. et al. Relationship of Diet to Root Caries. Am J Clin Nutr 1995; 61: 423S-429S
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Tjäderhane L, Buzalaf MAR, Carrilho M. et al. Matrix Metalloproteinases and Other Matrix Proteinases in Relation to Cariology: The Era of ʼDentin Degradomicsʼ. Caries Res 2015; 49: 193-208
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Plemons JM, Al-Hashimi I, Marek CL. Managing xerostomia and salivary gland hypofunction: Executive summary of a report from the American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs. J Am Dent Assoc 2014; 145: 867-873
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Papas AS, Joshi A, MacDonald SL. et al. Caries prevalence in xerostomic individuals. J Can Dent Assoc 1993; 59: 171-174 177–179
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Navazesh M, Kumar SK. Xerostomia: prevalence, diagnosis, and management. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2009; 30: 326-328 331-332; quiz 333-334
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Do T, Damé-Teixeira N, Naginyte M. et al. Root Surface Biofilms and Caries. Monogr Oral Sci 2017; 26: 26-34
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Kweon HH-I, Lee J-H, Youk T-M. et al. Panoramic radiography can be an effective diagnostic tool adjunctive to oral examinations in the national health checkup program. J Periodontal Implant Sci 2018; 48: 317-325
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Lane EJ, Proto AV, Phillips TW. Mach Bands and Density Perception. Radiology 1976; 121: 9-17
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Berry jr. HM. Cervical Burnout and Mach Band: Two Shadows of Doubt in Radiologic Interpretation of Carious Lesions. J Am Dent Assoc 1983; 106: 622-625
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Pasler FA. Zahnärztliche Radiologie. 5. Aufl.. Stuttgart: Thieme; 2017
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Wittneben J-G, Zöllner A, Wright AF. et al. Comparison of visual-tactile, radiographic, and histologic diagnoses of subgingival crown margin caries- an in vitro study. Int J Prosthodont 2009; 22: 561-565
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Zoellner A, Heuermann M, Weber H-P. et al. Secondary caries in crowned teeth: correlation of clinical and radiographic findings. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 88: 314-319
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Haak R, Wicht MJ. Caries detection and quantification with DIAGNOdent: prospects for occlusal and root caries?. Int J Comput Dent 2004; 7: 347-358
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Pretty IA. Monitoring of Root Caries Lesions. Monogr Oral Sci 2017; 26: 70-75
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Carvalho TS, Lussi A. Assessment of Root Caries Lesion Activity and Its Histopathological Features. Monogr Oral Sci 2017; 26: 63-69
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Rodrigues JA, Lussi A, Seemann R. et al. Prevention of crown and root caries in adults. Periodontol 2000 2011; 55: 231-249
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Heasman PA, Ritchie M, Asuni A. et al. Gingival recession and root caries in the ageing population: a critical evaluation of treatments. J Clin Periodontol 2017; 44: S178-S193
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Wierichs RJ, Meyer-Lueckel H. Systematic Review on Noninvasive Treatment of Root Caries Lesions. J Dent Res 2015; 94: 261-271
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Seifo N, Cassie H, Radford JR. et al. Silver diamine fluoride for managing carious lesions: an umbrella review. BMC Oral Health 2019; 19: 145 doi:10.1186/s12903-019-0830-5
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Delgado AJ, Olafsson VG. Acidic oral moisturizers with pH below 6.7 may be harmful to teeth depending on formulation: a short report. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent 2017; 9: 81-83
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Grönbeck Lindén I, Hägglin C, Gahnberg L. et al. Factors Affecting Older Personsʼ Ability to Manage Oral Hygiene: A Qualitative Study. JDR Clin Trans Res 2017; 2: 223-232
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Jennings A. Assessing Oral Hygiene in Hospitalized Older Veterans. Medsurg Nurs 2015; 24: 420-424
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Coker E, Ploeg J, Kaasalainen S. et al. Observations of oral hygiene care interventions provided by nurses to hospitalized older people. Geriatr Nurs 2017; 38: 17-21
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Mjör IA. The location of clinically diagnosed secondary caries. Quintessence Int 1998; 29: 313-317
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Buchalla W, Frankenberger R, Galler K. et al. Aktuelle Empfehlungen zur Kariesexkavation. Wissenschaftliche Mitteilung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Zahnerhaltung (DGZ). Dtsch Zahnarztl Z 2017; 72: 484-494
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Edelhoff D, Sorensen JA. Tooth structure removal associated with various preparation designs for anterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 87: 503-509
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Edelhoff D, Sorensen JA. Tooth structure removal associated with various preparation designs for posterior teeth. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2002; 22: 241-249
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Tabassum S, Adnan S, Khan FR. Gingival Retraction Methods: A Systematic Review. J Prosthodont 2017; 26: 637-643
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Kanzow P, Wiegand A, Schwendicke F. et al. Same, same, but different? A systematic review of protocols for restoration repair. J Dent 2019; 86: 1-16
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Celik EU, Tunac AT, Yilmaz F. A Randomized, Controlled, Split-mouth Trial Evaluating the Clinical Performance of High-viscosity Glass-ionomer Restorations in Noncarious Cervical Lesions: Two-year Results. J Adhes Dent 2018; 20: 299-305
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Szesz A, Parreiras S, Reis A. et al. Selective enamel etching in cervical lesions for self-etch adhesives: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent 2016; 53: 1-11
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Göstemeyer G, Blunck U. Reparatur/Korrektur von Restaurationen. ZWR 2016; 125: 167-168
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Boing TF, de Geus JL, Wambier LM. et al. Are Glass-Ionomer Cement Restorations in Cervical Lesions More Long-Lasting than Resin-based Composite Resins? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Adhes Dent 2018; 20: 435-452
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Alomari Q, Al-Saiegh F, Qudeimat M. et al. Recurrent caries at crown margins: making a decision on treatment. Med Princ Pract 2009; 18: 187-192
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar