Under What Conditions Can People With Severe Dementia in Nursing Homes Benefit From a Multicomponent Psychosocial Intervention?

Abstract

Background The majority of psychosocial interventions are considered effective in the treatment of dementia symptoms. However, there are hardly any evaluated concepts for people with severe dementia. An RCT study of patients with severe dementia in nursing homes during the Covid-19 pandemic found no effect of the newly developed multi-component intervention MAKS-s (motor, activities of daily living, cognitive, social version for persons with severe dementia) on patients’ quality of life, behavioural and psychological symptoms.

Material and methods At the end of the controlled phase, 6 months after beginning of the study, the nursing staff of the control groups were also trained in MAKS-s. They were then free to decide whether and how often they wanted to use MAKS-s (open phase). By means of a written follow-up survey, conducted with trained therapists, after another 6 months, predictors for positive effects of the intervention on people with severe dementia were to be identified. The survey also aimed to identify predictors of therapy fidelity. Data acquisition based on a self-developed questionnaire, assessing the therapists’ subjective ratings of the three areas of structure, process and outcome quality of the MAKS-s intervention. Apart from descriptive evaluations, the predictors of benefit for people with severe dementia were analysed using a linear regression model and the predictors of therapy fidelity by using a binary logistic regression model.

Results The more pronounced the normative restrictions due to the Covid-19 pandemic were, the more frequently manual deviations were observed. Fewer deviations from the manual were significantly associated with positive effects on people with severe dementia.

Conclusion The results indicate the importance of therapy fidelity for the success of MAKS-s intervention. Therapy fidelity is decisive for the extent of the positive effects of MAKS-s, experienced by the therapists. Furthermore, the survey results show that activity-restricting pandemic policies in nursing homes negatively influenced the perceived effectiveness.

Key words

psychosocial intervention - dementia - nursing homes - Treatment adherence and compliance - Covid-19

Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
26. September 2023

• Literatur

• 1 Gesellschaft DA. Mittlere Prävalenzrate von Demenzerkrankungen nach Alter und Geschlecht im Jahr 2021. 2022
• 2 Schäufele M. et al. [Prevalence of dementia and medical care in German nursing homes: a nationally representative survey]. Psychiatr Prax 2013; 40: 200-206
• 3 Diehl K. et al. The Psychopharmacological Treatment of People With Severe Dementia-Findings of a Cross-Sectional Study. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2022; 119: 664-665
• 4 Donabedian A. The quality of care. How can it be assessed?. JAMA 1988; 260: 1743-1748
• 5 Donabedian A. Evaluating the quality of medical care. 1966. Milbank Q 2005; 83: 691-729
• 6 Möller H-J, Laux G, Kapfhammer H-P. Psychiatrie, Psychosomatik, Psychotherapie: Band 1: Allgemeine Psychiatrie Band 2: Spezielle Psychiatrie. Springer-Verlag; 2009
• 7 Olazarán J. et al. Nonpharmacological therapies in Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review of efficacy. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2010; 30: 161-178
• 8 Oyebode JR, Parveen S. Psychosocial interventions for people with dementia: An overview and commentary on recent developments. Dementia (London) 2019; 18: 8-35
• 9 Bartholomeyczik S. Rahmenempfehlungen zum Umgang mit herausforderndem Verhalten bei Menschen mit Demenz in der stationären Altenhilfe. Demenz. 2006
• 10 Na R. et al. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Nonpharmacological Interventions for Moderate to Severe Dementia. Psychiatry Investig 2019; 16: 325-335
• 11 Diehl K, Kratzer A, Graessel E. The MAKS-s study: multicomponent non-pharmacological intervention for people with severe dementia in inpatient care study protocol of a randomised controlled trial. BMC Geriatr 2020; 20: 405
• 12 Kratzer A. et al. Non-pharmacological, psychosocial MAKS-s intervention for people with severe dementia in nursing homes: results of a cluster-randomised trial. BMC Geriatr 2022; 22: 1001
• 13 Gräßel E. et al. Implementierung und Wirkung der multimodalen psychosozialen MAKS-Intervention in der Tagespflege bei Menschen mit kognitiven Beeinträchtigungen: Ergebnisse in der offenen Phase nach Beendigung des RCT. Das Gesundheitswesen 2022; 84: 1154-1157
• 14 Straubmeier M. et al. Non-pharmacological treatment in people with cognitive impairment—results from the randomized controlled German Day Care Study. Deutsches Ärzteblatt International 2017; 114: 815-821
• 15 Park HG, Perumean-Chaney SE, Bartolucci AA. Exploring Factors Associated With Successful Nonpharmacological Interventions for People With Dementia. Dement Neurocogn Disord 2022; 21: 1-16
• 16 Clarke C. et al. Measuring the well-being of people with dementia: a conceptual scoping review. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2020; 18: 249
• 17 Hoffmann K. et al. Moderate-to-High Intensity Physical Exercise in Patients with Alzheimer’s Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Alzheimers Dis 2016; 50: 443-453
• 18 Hill HC, Erickson A. Using implementation fidelity to aid in interpreting program impacts: A brief review. Educational Researcher 2019; 48: 590-598
• 19 Kratzer A. et al. Non-pharmacological, psychosocial MAKS-s intervention for people with severe dementia in nursing homes: results of a cluster-randomised trial. BMC Geriatrics, in press.
• 20 Räker M, Klauber J, Schwinger A. Pflegerische Versorgung in der ersten Welle der COVID-19-Pandemie, in Pflege-Report 2021. Springer; Berlin, Heidelberg: 2021: 33-58