PDF herunterladen
Int J Sports Med 2014; 35(12): 1030-1036
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1368784
Training & Testing
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Which Are The Best VO2 Sampling Intervals to Characterize Low to Severe Swimming Intensities?

K. de Jesus
1   Centre of Research, Education, ­Innovation and Intervention in Sport, Faculty of Sport, ­University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
,
L. Guidetti
2   University of Rome “Foro Italico”, Department of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, Division of Health Sciences, Rome, Italy
,
K. de Jesus
1   Centre of Research, Education, ­Innovation and Intervention in Sport, Faculty of Sport, ­University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
,
J. P. Vilas-Boas
1   Centre of Research, Education, ­Innovation and Intervention in Sport, Faculty of Sport, ­University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
3   Porto Biomechanics ­Laboratory (LABIOMEP), Porto, Portugal
,
C. Baldari
2   University of Rome “Foro Italico”, Department of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, Division of Health Sciences, Rome, Italy
,
R. J. Fernandes
1   Centre of Research, Education, ­Innovation and Intervention in Sport, Faculty of Sport, ­University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
3   Porto Biomechanics ­Laboratory (LABIOMEP), Porto, Portugal
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf



accepted after revision 15. Januar 2014

Publikationsdatum:
03. Juni 2014 (online)

Auch verfügbar auf
    Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Cardiorespiratory response in swimming has been used to better understand aerobic performance, especially by assessing oxygen uptake (VO2). The current study aimed to compare different VO2 time-averaging intervals throughout low to severe swimming intensities, hypothesizing that VO2 values are similar for different time averages at low to moderate and heavy swimming intensities, but not for the severe domain. 20 male trained swimmers completed an incremental protocol of 7×200 m until exhaustion (0.05 m/s increments and 30 s intervals). VO2 was measured by a portable gas analyser connected to a snorkel system. 6 time average intervals (breath-by-breath, 5, 10, 15, 20 and 30 s) were compared for all the protocol steps. Breath-by-breath and 5 s average exhibited higher VO2 values than averages≥10 s for all swimming intensities (P≤0.02; partial η2≤0.28). VO2 values did not differ between 10, 15, 20 and 30 s averages throughout the incremental protocol (P>0.05; partial η2≤0.05). Furthermore, 10 and 15 s averages showed the lowest VO2 mean difference (0.19 mL · kg−1 · min−1). For the 6 time average intervals analysed, 10 and 15 s averages were those that showed the lowest changes on VO2 values. We recommended the use of 10 and 15 s time averaging intervals to determine relevant respiratory gas exchange parameters along a large spectrum of swimming intensities.

Key words

swimming - incremental protocol - oxygen uptake - sampling intervals
 

  • References

  • 1 Astorino TA. Alterations in VO2max and the VO2 plateau with manipulation of sampling intervals. Clin Physiol Func Imag 2009; 29: 60-67
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 2 Baldari C, Bonavolontà V, Emerenzian GP, Gallotta MC, Silva AJ, Guidetti L. Accuracy, reliability, linearity of Accutrend and Lactate Pro EBIO plus analyzer. Eur J Appl Physiol 2009; 107: 105-111
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 3 Baldari C, Fernandes R, Meucci M, Ribeiro J, Vilas-Boas JP, Guidetti L. Is the new Aqua Trainer® valid for VO2 assessment in swimming?. Int J Sports Med 2013; 34: 336-344
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 4 Barbosa T, Fernandes RJ, Keskinen KL, Vilas-Boas JP. The influence of stroke mechanics into energy cost of elite swimmers. Eur J Appl Physiol 2008; 103: 139-149
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 5 Barbosa T, Silva AJ, Reis AM, Costa M, Garrido N, Policarpo F, Reis VM. Kinematical changes in swimming front crawl and breaststroke with the AquaTrainer® snorkel. Eur J Appl Physiol 2010; 109: 1155-1162
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 6 Borg G, Hassmén P, Lagerström M. Perceived exertion related to heart rate and blood lactate during arm and leg exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol 1987; 56: 679-685
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 7 Burnley M, Jones A. Oxygen uptake kinetics as a determinant of sports performance. Eur J Appl Physiol 2007; 7: 63-79
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 8 Chidnok W, Dimenna FJ, Bailey SJ, Burnley M, Wilkerson DP, Vanhatalo A, Jones AM. VO2 max is not altered by self-pacing during incremental exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol 2013; 113: 529-539
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 9 Duffield R, Dawson B, Pinnington HC, Wong P. Accuracy and reliability of Cosmed K4b2 portable gas analysis system. J Sci Med Sport 2004; 7: 11-22
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 10 Fernandes RJ, Billat VL, Cruz AC, Colaço PJ, Cardoso CS, Vilas-Boas JP. Does net energy cost of swimming affect time to exhaustion at the individual’s maximal oxygen consumption velocity?. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 2006; 46: 373-380
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 11 Fernandes RJ, Keskinen K, Colaço P, Querido AJ, Machado LJ, Morais PA, Novais DQ, Marinho DA, Vilas-Boas JP. Time limit at VO2max velocity in elite crawl swimmers. Int J Sports Med 2008; 29: 145-150
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 12 Fernandes RJ, Sousa M, Machado L, Vilas-Boas JP. Step length and individual anaerobic threshold assessment in swimming. Int J Sports Med 2011; 32: 940-946
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 13 Fernandes RJ, de Jesus K, Baldari C, de Jesus K, Sousa AC, Vilas-Boas JP, Guidetti L. Different VO2max time-averaging intervals in swimming. Int J Sports Med 2012; 33: 1010-1015
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 14 Gayda M, Bosquet L, Martin J, Guiraud T, Lambert J, Nigam A. Comparison of gas exchange data using the Aquatrainer® system and facemask with Cosmed K4b2 during exercise in health subjects. Eur J Appl Physiol 2010; 109: 191-199
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 15 Harriss DJ, Atkinson G. Ethical standards in sport and exercise science research: 2014 Update. Int J Sports Med 2013; 34: 1025-1028
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 16 Hill DW, Stephens LP, Blumoff-Ross SA, Poole DC, Smith JC. Effect of sampling strategy on measures of VO2peak obtained using commercial breath-by-breath systems. Eur J Appl Physiol 2003; 89: 564-569
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 17 Jones AM, Vanhatalo A, Burnley M, Morton RH, Poole DC. Critical Power: implications for determination of VO2max and exercise tolerance. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2010; 42: 1876-1890
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 18 Komar J, Leprêtre PM, Alberty M, Vantorre J, Fernandes RJ, Hellard P, Chollet D, Seifert L. Effect of increasing energy cost on arm coordination in elite sprint swimmers. Hum Movement Sci 2012; 31: 620-629
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 19 Kuipers H, Rietjens G, Verstappen F, Schoenmakers H, Hofman G. Effects of stage duration in incremental running tests on physiological variables. Int J Sports Med 2003; 24: 486-491
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 20 Ludbrook J. Linear regression analysis for comparing two measures or methods of measurement: But which regression?. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 2010; 37: 692-699
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 21 McLaughlin JE, King GA, Howley ET, Basset DR, Ainsworth BE. Validation of the cosmed K4b2 portable metabolic system. Int J Sports Med 2001; 22: 280-284
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 22 Midgley AW, McNaughton LR, Carroll S. Time at VO2max during intermittent treadmill running: Test protocol dependent or methodological artifact?. Int J Sports Med 2007; 28: 934-939
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 23 Myers J, Walsh D, Sullivan M, Froelicher V. Effect of sampling on variability and plateau in oxygen uptake. J Appl Physiol 1990; 68: 404-410
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 24 Özyener F, Rossiter HB, Ward SA, Whipp BJ. Influence of exercise intensity on the on- and off-transient kinetics of pulmonary oxygen uptake in humans. J Physiol 2001; 533: 891-902
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 25 Poole DC, Wilkerson DP, Jones AM. Validity of criteria for establishing maximal O2 uptake during ramp exercise tests. Eur J Appl Physiol 2008; 102: 403-410
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 26 Reis JF, Millet GP, Malatesta D, Roels B, Borrani F, Vleck VE, Alves FB. Are oxygen kinetics modified when using a respiratory snorkel?. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 2010; 5: 292-300
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 27 Reis JF, Alves FB, Bruno PM, Vleck V, Millet GP. Effects of aerobic fitness on oxygen uptake kinetics in heavy swimming intensity. Eur J Appl Physiol 2012; 112: 1689-1697
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 28 Reis JF, Alves FB, Bruno PM, Vleck V, Millet GP. Oxygen uptake kinetics and middle distance swimming performance. J Sci Med Sport 2012; 15: 58-63
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 29 Robergs RA, Dwyer D, Astorino A. Recommendations for improved data processing from expired gas analysis indirect calorimetry. Sport Med 2010; 40: 95-111
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 30 Roels B, Schmitt L, Libicz S, Bentley D, Richalet JP, Millet G. Specificity of VO2max and the ventilatory threshold in free swimming and cycle ergometry: comparison between triathletes and swimmers. Br J Sports Med 2005; 39: 965-968
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 31 Whipp BJ, Ward SA, Lamarra N, Davis JA, Wasserman K. Parameters of ventilatory and gas exchange dynamics during exercise. J Appl Physiol 1982; 52: 1506-1513
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar