PDF herunterladen
Aktuelle Neurologie 2014; 41(10): 597-607
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1390482
Übersicht
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

MRT-Diagnostik der Hirnnerven und ihrer Läsionen

MRI of the Cranial Nerves and their Lesions
K. Bochmann
1   Abteilung für Neuroradiologie, Klinikum der Universität München
,
N. Lummel
1   Abteilung für Neuroradiologie, Klinikum der Universität München
,
J. Linn
1   Abteilung für Neuroradiologie, Klinikum der Universität München
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
08. Januar 2015 (online)

Auch verfügbar auf
    Lizenzen und Reprints

Zusammenfassung

In der radiologischen Diagnostik des Hirnstamms bzw. der Hirnnerven stellt die Magnetresonanztomografie (MRT) heute den Goldstandard dar. Um die Hirnnerven im zisternalen Segment sowie im Sinus cavernosus darstellen zu können werden dabei vor allem hochauflösende Steady-State-Sequenzen verwendet. Zur Beurteilung der knöchernen Felsenbeinstrukturen ist die hochauflösende Computertomografie (HRCT) jedoch nach wie vor die Methode der Wahl. In diesem Artikel werden die diagnostischen Möglichkeiten und die neuen Entwicklungen in der Schnittbilddiagnostik dieser komplexen Hirnstrukturen dargelegt, wobei der Fokus auf der MRT-Diagnostik liegt.

Abstract

To date, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) represents the gold standard in the radiological diagnostics of the brain stem and the cranial nerves. In particular, the high-resolution steady-state sequences are used to image the cisternal and the cavernous segments of the cranial nerves. In contrast, high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) is the method of choice to evaluate the bony structures of the petrous bone. This review illustrates the feasibilities and new developments in the diagnostic imaging of these complex brain structures, with focus on MRI.

Schlüsselwörter

MRT - Hirnstamm - Hirnnerven - DTI - Felsenbein

Keywords

MRI - brain stem - cranial nerves - DTI - temporal bone
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Borges A, Casselman J. Imaging the cranial nerves: Part I: methodology, infectious and inflammatory, traumatic and congenital lesions. Eur Radiol 2007; 17: 2112-2125
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Borges A, Casselman J. Imaging the cranial nerves: part II: primary and secondary neoplastic conditions and neurovascular conflicts. Eur Radiol 2007; 17: 2332-2344
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Chen X, Weigel D, Ganslandt O et al. Diffusion tensor imaging and white matter tractography in patients with brainstem lesions. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2007; 149: 1117-1131 discussion 1131
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Habas C, Cabanis EA. Anatomical parcellation of the brainstem and cerebellar white matter: a preliminary probabilistic tractography study at 3T. Neuroradiology 2007; 49: 849-863
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Habas C, Cabanis EA. Cortical projection to the human red nucleus: complementary results with probabilistic tractography at 3T. Neuroradiology 2007; 49: 777-784
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Kamali A, Kramer LA, Butler IJ et al. Diffusion tensor tractography of the somatosensory system in the human brainstem: initial findings using high isotropic spatial resolution at 3.0T. Eur Radiol 2009; 19: 1480-1488
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Nagae-Poetscher LM, Jiang H, Wakana S et al. High-resolution diffusion tensor imaging of the brain stem at 3T. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004; 25: 1325-1330
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Salamon N, Sicotte N, Alger J et al. Analysis of the brain-stem white-matter tracts with diffusion tensor imaging. Neuroradiology 2005; 47: 895-902
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Basser PJ, Mattiello J, LeBihan D. MR diffusion tensor spectroscopy and imaging. Biophys J 1994; 66: 259-267
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Basser PJ, Pierpaoli C. Microstructural and physiological features of tissues elucidated by quantitative-diffusion-tensor MRI. 1996. J Magn Reson 2011; 213: 560-570
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Einstein Jr AB. Hippocrates Meets Wall Street. Cancer control 1996; 3: 237-239
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Moseley ME, Cohen Y, Kucharczyk J et al. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of anisotropic water diffusion in cat central nervous system. Radiology 1990; 176: 439-445
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Basser PJ. Inferring microstructural features and the physiological state of tissues from diffusion-weighted images. NMR Biomed 1995; 8: 333-344
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Le Bihan D, Breton E, Lallemand D et al. MR imaging of intravoxel incoherent motions: application to diffusion and perfusion in neurologic disorders. Radiology 1986; 161: 401-407
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Adachi M, Kabasawa H, Kawaguchi E. Depiction of the cranial nerves within the brain stem with use of PROPELLER multishot diffusion-weighted imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008; 29: 911-912
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Haacke EM, Xu Y, Cheng YC et al. Susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI). Magn Reson Med 2004; 52: 612-618
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Linn J, Bruckmann H. Differential diagnosis of nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage. Klin Neuroradiol 2009; 19: 45-61
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Manova ES, Habib CA, Boikov AS et al. Characterizing the mesencephalon using susceptibility-weighted imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009; 30: 569-574
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Fatterpekar GM, Naidich TP, Delman BN et al. Cytoarchitecture of the human cerebral cortex: MR microscopy of excised specimens at 9.4 Tesla. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002; 23: 1313-1321
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Gizewski ER, Maderwald S, Linn J et al. High-resolution anatomy of the human brain stem using 7-T MRI: improved detection of inner structures and nerves?. Neuroradiology 2014; 56: 177-186
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Casselman JW, Kuhweide R, Deimling M et al. Constructive interference in steady state-3DFT MR imaging of the inner ear and cerebellopontine angle. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1993; 14: 47-57
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Hatipoglu HG, Durakoglugil T, Ciliz D et al. Comparison of FSE T2W and 3D FIESTA sequences in the evaluation of posterior fossa cranial nerves with MR cisternography. Diagn Interv Radiol 2007; 13: 56-60
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Held P, Fellner C, Fellner F et al. MRI of inner ear anatomy using 3D MP-RAGE and 3D CISS sequences. Br J Radiol 1997; 70: 465-472
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Jung NY, Moon WJ, Lee MH et al. Magnetic resonance cisternography: comparison between 3-dimensional driven equilibrium with sensitivity encoding and 3-dimensional balanced fast-field echo sequences with sensitivity encoding. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2007; 31: 588-591
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Linn J, Moriggl B, Schwarz F et al. Cisternal segments of the glossopharyngeal, vagus, and accessory nerves: detailed magnetic resonance imaging-demonstrated anatomy and neurovascular relationships. J Neurosurg 2009; 110: 1026-1041
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Mikami T, Minamida Y, Yamaki T et al. Cranial nerve assessment in posterior fossa tumors with fast imaging employing steady-state acquisition (FIESTA). Neurosurg Rev 2005; 28: 261-266
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Naraghi R, Hastreiter P, Tomandl B et al. Three-dimensional visualization of neurovascular relationships in the posterior fossa: technique and clinical application. J Neurosurg 2004; 100: 1025-1035
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Seitz J, Held P, Frund R et al. Visualization of the IXth to XIIth cranial nerves using 3-dimensional constructive interference in steady state, 3-dimensional magnetization-prepared rapid gradient echo and T2-weighted 2-dimensional turbo spin echo magnetic resonance imaging sequences. J Neuroimaging 2001; 11: 160-164
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Yousry I, Camelio S, Schmid UD et al. Visualization of cranial nerves I–XII: value of 3D CISS and T2-weighted FSE sequences. Eur Radiol 2000; 10: 1061-1067
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Yousry I, Moriggl B, Dieterich M et al. MR anatomy of the proximal cisternal segment of the trochlear nerve: neurovascular relationships and landmarks. Radiology 2002; 223: 31-38
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Yousry I, Moriggl B, Holtmannspoetter M et al. Detailed anatomy of the motor and sensory roots of the trigeminal nerve and their neurovascular relationships: a magnetic resonance imaging study. J Neurosurg 2004; 101: 427-434
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Bochmann K. Prävalenz asymptomatischer Gefäß-Nerv-Kontakte bei gesunden Kontrollpersonen. In: DGNR. Köln, Germany: Vortrag DW004; 2012
    Google Scholar
  • 33 Yousry I, Moriggl B, Schmid UD et al. Detailed anatomy of the intracranial segment of the hypoglossal nerve: neurovascular relationships and landmarks on magnetic resonance imaging sequences. J Neurosurg 2002; 96: 1113-1122
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Adams ME, Linn J, Yousry I. Pathology of the ocular motor nerves III, IV, and VI. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2008; 18: 261-282 preceding x-x
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Evans RW, Torelli P, Manzoni GC. Glossopharyngeal neuralgia. Headache 2006; 46: 1200-1202
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Hufner K, Barresi D, Glaser M et al. Vestibular paroxysmia: diagnostic features and medical treatment. Neurology 2008; 71: 1006-1014
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Hufner K, Linn J, Strupp M. Recurrent attacks of vertigo with monocular oscillopsia. Neurology 2008; 71: 863
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Linn J, Schwarz F, Reinisch V et al. Ophthalmoplegic migraine with paresis of the sixth nerve: a neurovascular compression syndrome?. Cephalalgia 2008; 28: 667-670
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Meaney JF, Eldridge PR, Dunn LT et al. Demonstration of neurovascular compression in trigeminal neuralgia with magnetic resonance imaging. Comparison with surgical findings in 52 consecutive operative cases. J Neurosurg 1995; 83: 799-805
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Prasad S, Galetta S. Trigeminal neuralgia: historical notes and current concepts. Neurologist 2009; 15: 87-94
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Sindou MP, Polo G, Fischer C et al. Neurovascular conflict and hemifacial spasm. Suppl Clin Neurophysiol 2006; 58: 274-281
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Straube A, Linn J. Unilateral headache attacks and ipsilateral atrophy of the tongue due to neurovascular compression of the hypoglossal nerve. Cephalalgia 2008; 28: 996-998
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Yousry I, Dieterich M, Naidich TP et al. Superior oblique myokymia: magnetic resonance imaging support for the neurovascular compression hypothesis. Ann Neurol 2002; 51: 361-368
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Zakrzewska JM. Diagnosis and differential diagnosis of trigeminal neuralgia. Clin J Pain 2002; 18: 14-21
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Adamczyk M, Bulski T, Sowińska J et al. Trigeminal nerve-artery contact in people without trigeminal neuralgia – MR study. Med Sci Monit 2007; 13 (Suppl. 01) 38-43
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Kress B, Schindler M, Rasche D et al. Trigeminal neuralgia: how often are trigeminal nerve-vessel contacts found by MRI in normal volunteers. Röfo 2006; 178: 313-315
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Wilkins RH. Hemifacial spasm: a review. Surg Neurol 1991; 36: 251-277
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Bruyn GW. Glossopharyngeal neuralgia. Cephalalgia 1983; 3: 143-157
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Carlow TJ. Oculomotor ophthalmoplegic migraine: is it really migraine? J Neuroophthalmol. 2002; 22: 215-221
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Lal V, Sahota P, Singh P et al. Ophthalmoplegia with migraine in adults: is it ophthalmoplegic migraine?. Headache 2009; 49: 838-850
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Lance JW, Zagami AS. Ophthalmoplegic migraine: a recurrent demyelinating neuropathy?. Cephalalgia 2001; 21: 84-89
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Ambrosetto P, Nicolini F, Zoli M et al. Ophthalmoplegic migraine: From questions to answers. Cephalalgia 2014; 34: 917-919
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Goldenberg-Cohen N, Miller NR. Noninvasive neuroimaging of basilar artery dolichoectasia in a patient with an isolated abducens nerve paresis. Am J Ophthalmol 2004; 137: 365-367
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Narai H, Manabe Y, Deguchi K et al. Isolated abducens nerve palsy caused by vascular compression. Neurology 2000; 55: 453-454
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Tilikete C, Vial C, Niederlaender M et al. Idiopathic ocular neuromyotonia: a neurovascular compression syndrome?. J Neurol Neurosur Psychiatry 2000; 69: 642-644
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Thömke F, Gawehn J. Vascular third nerve compression – a possible cause of episodic vertical diplopia?. J Neuroophthalmol 2006; 30: 125-127
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 De Ridder D, Moller A, Verlooy J et al. Is the root entry/exit zone important in microvascular compression syndromes?. Neurosurgery 2002; 51: 427-433 discussion 433–424
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Lang J. Neuroanatomy of the optic, trigeminal, facial, glossopharyngeal, vagus, accessory and hypoglossal nerves (author’s transl). Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1981; 231: 1-69
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Koch MA, Glauche V, Finsterbusch J et al. Distortion-free diffusion tensor imaging of cranial nerves and of inferior temporal and orbitofrontal white matter. NeuroImage 2002; 17: 497-506
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 60 Abe O, Mori H, Aoki S et al. Periodically rotated overlapping parallel lines with enhanced reconstruction-based diffusion tensor imaging. Comparison with echo planar imaging-based diffusion tensor imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2004; 28: 654-660
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 61 Wang FN, Huang TY, Lin FH et al. PROPELLER EPI: an MRI technique suitable for diffusion tensor imaging at high field strength with reduced geometric distortions. Magn Reson Med 2005; 54: 1232-1240
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 62 Herweh C, Kress B, Rasche D et al. Loss of anisotropy in trigeminal neuralgia revealed by diffusion tensor imaging. Neurology 2007; 68: 776-778
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 63 Lutz J, Linn J, Mehrkens JH et al. Trigeminal neuralgia due to neurovascular compression: high-spatial-resolution diffusion-tensor imaging reveals microstructural neural changes. Radiology 2011; 258: 524-530
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 64 Bochmann K, Lutz J, Mehrkens JH et al. Darstellung der strukturellen Integrität des N. trigeminus mittels Diffusions Tensor-Imaging: Hilfreich zur Differenzierung zwischen symptomatischen und asymptomatischen Gefäß-Nerv-Kontakten?. Clin Neuroradiol 2013; 23 (Suppl. 01) 108
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 65 Linn J, Peters F, Lummel N et al. Detailed imaging of the normal anatomy and pathologic conditions of the cavernous region at 3 Tesla using a contrast-enhanced MR angiography. Neuroradiology 2011; 53: 947-954
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 66 Linn J, Peters F, Moriggl B et al. The jugular foramen: imaging strategy and detailed anatomy at 3T. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009; 30: 34-41
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 67 Yousry I, Moriggl B, Schmid UD et al. Trigeminal ganglion and its divisions: detailed anatomic MR imaging with contrast-enhanced 3D constructive interference in the steady state sequences. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005; 26: 1128-1135
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 68 Yagi A, Sato N, Taketomi A et al. Normal cranial nerves in the cavernous sinuses: contrast-enhanced three-dimensional constructive interference in the steady state MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005; 26: 946-950
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 69 De Foer B, Vercruysse JP, Bernaerts A et al. The value of single-shot turbo spin-echo diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the detection of middle ear cholesteatoma. Neuroradiology 2007; 49: 841-848
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 70 De Foer B, Vercruysse JP, Pilet B et al. Single-shot, turbo spin-echo, diffusion-weighted imaging versus spin-echo-planar, diffusion-weighted imaging in the detection of acquired middle ear cholesteatoma. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006; 27: 1480-1482
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 71 Vercruysse JP, De Foer B, Pouillon M et al. The value of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the diagnosis of primary acquired and residual cholesteatoma: a surgical verified study of 100 patients. Eur Radiol 2006; 16: 1461-1467
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 72 De Foer B, Vercruysse JP, Bernaerts A et al. Detection of postoperative residual cholesteatoma with non-echo-planar diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Otol Neurotol 2008; 29: 513-517
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 73 Lehmann P, Saliou G, Brochart C et al. 3T MR imaging of postoperative recurrent middle ear cholesteatomas: value of periodically rotated overlapping parallel lines with enhanced reconstruction diffusion-weighted MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009; 30: 423-427
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 74 Nakashima T, Naganawa S, Katayama N et al. Clinical significance of endolymphatic imaging after intratympanic gadolinium injection. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 2009; 560: 9-14
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 75 Nakashima T, Naganawa S, Sugiura M et al. Visualization of endolymphatic hydrops in patients with Meniere’s disease. Laryngoscope 2007; 117: 415-420
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 76 Gurkov R, Kantner C, Strupp M et al. Endolymphatic hydrops in patients with vestibular migraine and auditory symptoms. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2013; DOI: 10.1007/s00405-013-2751-2.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 77 Naganawa S, Yamazaki M, Kawai H et al. Imaging of endolymphatic and perilymphatic fluid after intravenous administration of single-dose gadodiamide. Magn Reson Med Sci 2012; 11: 145-150
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar