Understanding Approaches to the Dorsal Hump

Abstract

Dorsal hump reduction is a central component of western aesthetic rhinoplasty. Surgical success begins with knowledge of aesthetic ideals and accurate preoperative analysis. Knowledge of the patient's distortion from aesthetic ideals informs approach, technique, and instrument selection. Both endonasal and external approaches are suitable for dorsal hump reduction, though the latter affords more versatility when other surgical modifications are necessary. The main techniques consist of en bloc, Skoog, and component resection. Each has their distinct advantage, though a surgeon's comfort level with each should impact technique selection. Completion of the dorsal reduction often leaves a defect that must be reconstructed. Failure to anticipate the potential long-term sequelae and appropriately manage the dorsal defect can lead to a poor result and patient dissatisfaction.

Keywords

aesthetic rhinoplasty - surgical techniques - dorsal hump - nasal surgery - dorsal hump reduction

• References

• 1 Azizzadeh B, Reilly M. Dorsal hump reduction and osteotomies. Clin Plast Surg 2016; 43 (1) 47-58
• 2 Crumley RL, Lanser M. Quantitative analysis of nasal tip projection. Laryngoscope 1988; 98 (2) 202-208
• 3 Park SS. Fundamental principles in aesthetic rhinoplasty. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol 2011; 4 (2) 55-66
• 4 Orten S, Hilger P. Facial analysis of the rhinoplasty patient. In: Papel I, , ed. Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Thieme; 2002: 361-368
• 5 Lazovic GD, Daniel RK, Janosevic LB, Kosanovic RM, Colic MM, Kosins AM. Rhinoplasty: the nasal bones - anatomy and analysis. Aesthet Surg J 2015; 35 (3) 255-263
• 6 Mowlavi A, Meldrum DG, Wilhelmi BJ. Implications for nasal recontouring: nasion position preferences as determined by a survey of white North Americans. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2003; 27 (6) 438-445
• 7 Daniel RK, The radix and the nasofrontal angle. In: Gunter J, Rhorhich R. , eds. 16th Annual Dallas Rhinoplasty Symposium. Dallas, TX: University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center; 1999: 263
• 8 Rohrich RJ, Muzaffar AR, Janis JE. Component dorsal hump reduction: the importance of maintaining dorsal aesthetic lines in rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 114 (5) 1298-1308 , discussion 1309–1312
• 9 Sykes JM, Tapias V, Kim JE. Management of the nasal dorsum. Facial Plast Surg 2011; 27 (2) 192-202
• 10 Ballert JA, Park SS. Functional considerations in revision rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg 2008; 24 (3) 348-357
• 11 Kasperbauer JL, Kern EB. Nasal valve physiology. Implications in nasal surgery. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1987; 20 (4) 699-719
• 12 Grymer LF. Reduction rhinoplasty and nasal patency: change in the cross-sectional area of the nose evaluated by acoustic rhinometry. Laryngoscope 1995; 105 (4 Pt 1) 429-431
• 13 Arslan E, Aksoy A. Upper lateral cartilage-sparing component dorsal hump reduction in primary rhinoplasty. Laryngoscope 2007; 117 (6) 990-996
• 14 Gunter JP, Rohrich RJ. External approach for secondary rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 1987; 80 (2) 161-174
• 15 Skoog T. A method of hump reduction in rhinoplasty. A technique for preservation of the nasal roof. Arch Otolaryngol 1966; 83 (3) 283-287
• 16 Hall JA, Peters MD, Hilger PA. Modification of the Skoog dorsal reduction for preservation of the middle nasal vault. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2004; 6 (2) 105-110
• 17 Yoo S, Most SP. Nasal airway preservation using the autospreader technique: analysis of outcomes using a disease-specific quality-of-life instrument. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2011; 13 (4) 231-233
• 18 Gruber RP, Melkun ET, Woodward JF, Perkins SW. Dorsal reduction and spreader flaps. Aesthet Surg J 2011; 31 (4) 456-464
• 19 Gruber RP, Park E, Newman J, Berkowitz L, Oneal R. The spreader flap in primary rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 119 (6) 1903-1910
• 20 Tardy Jr ME. Rhinoplasty: The Art and the Science. Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders; 1997
• 21 Becker DG, Toriumi DM, Gross CW, Tardy Jr ME. Powered instrumentation for dorsal reduction. Facial Plast Surg 1997; 13 (4) 291-297
• 22 Gerbault O, Daniel RK, Kosins AM. The role of piezoelectric instrumentation in rhinoplasty surgery. Aesthet Surg J 2016; 36 (1) 21-34
• 23 Robiony M, Polini F, Costa F, Toro C, Politi M. Ultrasound piezoelectric vibrations to perform osteotomies in rhinoplasty. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007; 65 (5) 1035-1038
• 24 Cochran CS, Roostaeian J. Use of the ultrasonic bone aspirator for lateral osteotomies in rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 132 (6) 1430-1433
• 25 Labanca M, Azzola F, Vinci R, Rodella LF. Piezoelectric surgery: twenty years of use. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008; 46 (4) 265-269
• 26 Pribitkin E, Greywoode JD. Sonic rhinoplasty: innovative applications. Facial Plast Surg 2013; 29 (2) 127-132
• 27 Pribitkin EA, Lavasani LS, Shindle C, Greywoode JD. Sonic rhinoplasty: sculpting the nasal dorsum with the ultrasonic bone aspirator. Laryngoscope 2010; 120 (8) 1504-1507
• 28 Clark JM, Cook TA. The ‘butterfly’ graft in functional secondary rhinoplasty. Laryngoscope 2002; 112 (11) 1917-1925
• 29 Daniel RK. Diced cartilage grafts in rhinoplasty surgery: current techniques and applications. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 122 (6) 1883-1891