Concepts, Knowledge and Language in Healthcare Information Systems: Follow-up 30 Months Later

Abstract

The paper reviews the last IMIA-WG6 recommendations, issued along two themes: (1) how to better share common results and (2) how to conduct new research and development efforts. Some of the major discrepancies in the field are reviewed. The paper intends to offer insight into two areas, first, in the issue of knowledge representation and, second, in the science of meaning, incorporating the broad intersection of computational linguistics, semantics, conceptual approach, and denotation. The Ogden-Richards meaning triangle is used as a convenient organizing principle to maximize the scope of understanding among the different schools, particularly in areas of linguistics and semantics on the one side and denotation and conceptual approach on the other. In conclusion, there is a need for clarification and for more scientific pragmatism.

Keywords

Concepts - Healthcare Information - Knowledge Representation - Computational Linguistics

• REFERENCES

• 1 McCray AT, Scherrer JR, Safran C, Chute CG. Concepts, knowledge and language in healthcare information systems. Meth Inform Med 1995; 34: 1-4.
• 2 Spahni S, Scherrer JR, Sauquet D, Sottile PA. Consensual trends for optimizing the constitution of middleware. Comm ACM (to be publ).
• 3 Cassirer E. Philosophie der Symbolischen Formen (3 vols). Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft 1953 (1924); Translated in French: Le Philosophe des Formes Symboliques. Paris: Ed de Minuit; 1972
• 4 Sowa JF. Knowledge Representation: Logical, Philosophical, and Computational Foundations. Boston: PWS Publishing; 1995
• 5 Miller RA, Pople HE, Myers JD. Internist-1, an experimental computer-based diagnostic consultant for general internal medicine. N Engl J Med 1982; 307: 468-76.
• 6 McCray AT, Nelson SJ. The representation of meaning in the UMLS. Meth Inform Med 1995; 34: 193-210.
• 7 Sowa JF. Conceptual Structures: Information Processing in Mind and Machine Reading. Boston MA: Addison-Wesley; 1984
• 8 Wittgenstein L. Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell; 1953
• 9 Waismann F. Verifiability. In: Fleur A. ed. Logic and Language (1st series). Oxford: Basil Blackwell; 1952
• 10 McCarthy J, Hayes P. Some philosophical problems from the standpoint of artificial intelligence. In: Michie O, Meltzer B. eds. Machine Intelligence 4. New York: Wiley; 1969
• 11 Brachman RJ. On the epistemological status of semantic networks. In: Findler NV. ed Associative Networks: Representation and Use of Knowledge by Computers. New York: Academic Press; 1979: 3-50.
• 12 Lenat DB, Gutha RV. Building Large Knowledge-based Systems. Reading, Addison Wesley; 1990
• 13 Degoulet P, Fieschi M, Chatellier G. Decision support systems from the standpoint of knowledge representation. Meth Inform Med 1995; 34: 202-8.
• 14 Sowa JF, Zachman JA. A logic-based approach to enterprise integration. In: Petrie CJ. ed. Enterprise Integration Modeling. Cambridge MA: MIT Press; 1992: 152-63.
• 15 Ogden CK, Richards IA. The Meaning of Meaning. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World; 1946
• 16 De Saussure F. Cours de Linguistique Generale. Edited by Tullio de Mauro Paris: Payot; 1972
• 17 Gambocz Z, Jelenstestan P. In: Ullmann S. The Principles of Semantics. Glasgow: Jackson and Oxford Blackwell; 1951. (2nd ed 1959).
• 18 Meillet A. Comment les mots changent de sens. In: Annee Sociologique. Paris: Champion; 1905. -1906.
• 19 Breal M. Les lois intellectuelles du langage. Annuaire de I'Association pour l'encouragement des etudes Greques en France. 1883
• 20 Hjelmslev L. Prolegomena to a Theory of Language. The University of Wisconsin Press; 1961
• 21 Ullmann S. Semantics – An Introduction to the Science of Meaning. Oxford: Blackwell; 1962
• 22 Chomsky N. Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton; 1957
• 23 Wehrli E, Clark R. Natural language processing, lexicon and semantics. Meth Inform Med 1955; 34: 68-74.