J Knee Surg 2019; 32(07): 611-615
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1681077
Special Focus Section
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Resurfaced versus Non-Resurfaced Patella in Total Knee Arthroplasty

1   Medical University of South Carolina, College of Medicine, Charleston, South Carolina
,
Josef Eichinger
2   Department of Orthopaedics, Medical University of South Carolina, College of Medicine, Charleston, South Carolina
,
Richard Friedman
2   Department of Orthopaedics, Medical University of South Carolina, College of Medicine, Charleston, South Carolina
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

05. Januar 2019

22. Januar 2019

Publikationsdatum:
27. Februar 2019 (online)

Abstract

The prevalence of knee osteoarthritis is increasing, as is the projected use of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to treat severe cases that fail to respond to conservative measures. Implant designs are either cruciate retaining or posterior stabilized, and while both have high success rates, management of the patella still remains a controversial topic. Although studies indicate that resurfacing the patella provides no significant clinical differences compared with non-resurfacing techniques, surgeons continue to resurface the patella during TKA. Rates of patella resurfacing continue to be as high as 90% in the United States, while European countries tend to favor non-resurfacing techniques. The purpose of this article is to discuss relevant research on patella resurfacing during TKA, to compare the results, and give evidence-based recommendations on how it should be approached going forward.

 
  • References

  • 1 Neogi T, Zhang Y. Epidemiology of osteoarthritis. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 2013; 39 (01) 1-19
  • 2 Vos T, Flaxman AD, Naghavi M. , et al. Years lived with disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 2012; 380 (9859): 2163-2196
  • 3 Lawrence RC, Felson DT, Helmick CG. , et al; National Arthritis Data Workgroup. Estimates of the prevalence of arthritis and other rheumatic conditions in the United States. Part II. Arthritis Rheum 2008; 58 (01) 26-35
  • 4 Papas PV, Cushner FD, Scuderi GR. The history of total knee arthroplasty. Tech Orthop 2018; 33 (01) 2-6
  • 5 Insall JN, Ranawat CS, Aglietti P, Shine J. A comparison of four models of total knee-replacement prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1976; 58 (06) 754-765
  • 6 Pabinger C, Berghold A, Boehler N, Labek G. Revision rates after knee replacement. Cumulative results from worldwide clinical studies versus joint registers. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2013; 21 (02) 263-268
  • 7 American Joint Replacement Registry (AJRR). AJRR 2018 annual report . Retrieved from http://www.ajrr.net/publications-data/annual-reports
  • 8 Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH, Finlay JB, Nott L. Kinematic I and Oxford knee arthroplasty. A 5-8-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty 1987; 2 (04) 285-291
  • 9 Enis JE, Gardner R, Robledo MA, Latta L, Smith R. Comparison of patellar resurfacing versus nonresurfacing in bilateral total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1990; (260) 38-42
  • 10 Kajino A, Yoshino S, Kameyama S, Kohda M, Nagashima S. Comparison of the results of bilateral total knee arthroplasty with and without patellar replacement for rheumatoid arthritis. A follow-up note. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1997; 79 (04) 570-574
  • 11 Badhe N, Dewnany G, Livesley PJ. Should the patella be replaced in total knee replacement?. Int Orthop 2001; 25 (02) 97-99
  • 12 Murray DW, MacLennan GS, Breeman S. , et al; KAT group. A randomised controlled trial of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of different knee prostheses: the Knee Arthroplasty Trial (KAT). Health Technol Assess 2014; 18 (19) 1-235 , vii–viii
  • 13 Roberts DW, Hayes TD, Tate CT, Lesko JP. Selective patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. J Arthroplasty 2015; 30 (02) 216-222
  • 14 Waters TS, Bentley G. Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003; 85-A (02) 212-217
  • 15 Keblish PA, Varma AK, Greenwald AS. Patellar resurfacing or retention in total knee arthroplasty. A prospective study of patients with bilateral replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1994; 76 (06) 930-937
  • 16 Braakman M, Verburg AD, Bronsema G, van Leeuwen WM, Eeftinck MP. The outcome of three methods of patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 1995; 19 (01) 7-11
  • 17 Ikejiani CE, Leighton R, Petrie DP. Comparison of patellar resurfacing versus nonresurfacing in total knee arthroplasty. Can J Surg 2000; 43 (01) 35-38
  • 18 Lygre SH, Espehaug B, Havelin LI, Vollset SE, Furnes O. Does patella resurfacing really matter? Pain and function in 972 patients after primary total knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 2010; 81 (01) 99-107
  • 19 Hwang BH, Yang IH, Han CD. Comparison of patellar retention versus resurfacing in LCS mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2012; 20 (03) 524-531
  • 20 Li B, Bai L, Fu Y, Wang G, He M, Wang J. Comparison of clinical outcomes between patellar resurfacing and nonresurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: retrospective study of 130 cases. J Int Med Res 2012; 40 (05) 1794-1803
  • 21 Wurm S, Kainz H, Reng W, Augat P. The influence of patellar resurfacing on patellar kinetics and retropatellar contact characteristics. J Orthop Sci 2013; 18 (01) 61-69
  • 22 Feller JA, Bartlett RJ, Lang DM. Patellar resurfacing versus retention in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1996; 78 (02) 226-228
  • 23 Barrack RL, Bertot AJ, Wolfe MW, Waldman DA, Milicic M, Myers L. Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized, double-blind study with five to seven years of follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001; 83-A (09) 1376-1381
  • 24 Burnett RS, Haydon CM, Rorabeck CH, Bourne RB. Patella resurfacing versus nonresurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: results of a randomized controlled clinical trial at a minimum of 10 years' followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004; (428) 12-25
  • 25 Burnett RS, Boone JL, Rosenzweig SD, Steger-May K, Barrack RL. Patellar resurfacing compared with nonresurfacing in total knee arthroplasty. A concise follow-up of a randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009; 91 (11) 2562-2567
  • 26 Breeman S, Campbell M, Dakin H. , et al; KAT Trial Group. Patellar resurfacing in total knee replacement: five-year clinical and economic results of a large randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011; 93 (16) 1473-1481
  • 27 Beaupre L, Secretan C, Johnston DW, Lavoie G. A randomized controlled trial comparing patellar retention versus patellar resurfacing in primary total knee arthroplasty: 5-10 year follow-up. BMC Res Notes 2012; 5: 273
  • 28 Liu ZT, Fu PL, Wu HS, Zhu Y. Patellar reshaping versus resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty - results of a randomized prospective trial at a minimum of 7 years' follow-up. Knee 2012; 19 (03) 198-202
  • 29 Agarwala S, Shetty V, Karumuri LK, Vijayvargiya M. Patellar resurfacing versus nonresurfacing with patellaplasty in total knee arthroplasty. Indian J Orthop 2018; 52 (04) 393-398
  • 30 Campbell DG, Duncan WW, Ashworth M. , et al. Patellar resurfacing in total knee replacement: a ten-year randomised prospective trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006; 88 (06) 734-739
  • 31 Myles CM, Rowe PJ, Nutton RW, Burnett R. The effect of patella resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty on functional range of movement measured by flexible electrogoniometry. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2006; 21 (07) 733-739
  • 32 Oh IS, Kim MK, You DS, Kang SB, Lee KH. Total knee arthroplasty without patellar resurfacing. Int Orthop 2006; 30 (05) 415-419
  • 33 Burnett RS, Boone JL, McCarthy KP, Rosenzweig S, Barrack RL. A prospective randomized clinical trial of patellar resurfacing and nonresurfacing in bilateral TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007; 464 (464) 65-72
  • 34 Mayman D, Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH, Vaz M, Kramer J. Resurfacing versus not resurfacing the patella in total knee arthroplasty: 8- to 10-year results. J Arthroplasty 2003; 18 (05) 541-545
  • 35 Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH, Vaz M, Kramer J, Hardie R, Robertson D. Resurfacing versus not resurfacing the patella during total knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1995; (321) 156-161
  • 36 Ali A, Lindstrand A, Nilsdotter A, Sundberg M. Similar patient-reported outcomes and performance after total knee arthroplasty with or without patellar resurfacing. Acta Orthop 2016; 87 (03) 274-279
  • 37 Eshnazarov KE, Seon JK, Song EK. Comparison of radiological assessments patellar resurfacing with retention for grade IV osteoarthritis in patellofemoral joint accomplished total knee arthroplasty. Vestn Rentgenol Radiol 2016; 97 (01) 28-32
  • 38 Fraser JFS, Spangehl MJ. International rates of patellar resurfacing in primary total knee arthroplasty, 2004-2014. J Arthroplasty 2017; 32 (01) 83-86
  • 39 Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR). Hip, Knee & Shoulder Arthroplasty: 2018 Annual Report . Adelaide: AOA, 2018. Retrieved from https://aoanjrr.sahmri.com/documents/10180/576950/Hip%2C%20Knee%20%26%20Shoulder%20Arthroplasty
  • 40 Dutch Arthroplasty Register (LROI). Online LROI annual report 2017: 10 years of registration, a wealth of information . Retrieved from www.lroi-rapportage.nl
  • 41 Danish Kneelloplastik Register (DKR). DKR 2018 Report . Retrieved from https://www.sundhed.dk/content/cms/99/4699_dkr-rapport-2018_til-offentligg%C3%B8relse.pdf
  • 42 Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Arthroplasty and Hip Fractures. Norwegian Arthroplasty Register June 2018 Report . Retrieved from http://nrlweb.ihelse.net/eng/Rapporter/Report2018_english.pdf
  • 43 Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register. The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register Annual Report 2017 . Retrieved from http://www.myknee.se/pdf/SVK_2017_Eng_1.0.pdf
  • 44 Parvizi J, Mortazavi SM, Devulapalli C, Hozack WJ, Sharkey PF, Rothman RH. Secondary resurfacing of the patella after primary total knee arthroplasty does the anterior knee pain resolve?. J Arthroplasty 2012; 27 (01) 21-26
  • 45 Dong Y, Li T, Zheng Z, Xiang S, Weng X. Adding patella resurfacing after circumpatellar electrocautery did not improve the clinical outcome in bilateral total knee arthroplasty in Chinese population: a prospective randomized study. J Arthroplasty 2018; 33 (04) 1057-1061
  • 46 van Jonbergen HP, Reuver JM, Mutsaerts EL, Poolman RW. Determinants of anterior knee pain following total knee replacement: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2014; 22 (03) 478-499
  • 47 Park CN, White PB, Meftah M, Ranawat AS, Ranawat CS. Diagnostic algorithm for residual pain after total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 2016; 39 (02) e246-e252
  • 48 Parvizi J, Rapuri VR, Saleh KJ, Kuskowski MA, Sharkey PF, Mont MA. Failure to resurface the patella during total knee arthroplasty may result in more knee pain and secondary surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005; 438 (438) 191-196
  • 49 Park SJ, Jung YB, Jeong HJ. , et al. Long-term results of primary total knee arthroplasty with and without patellar resurfacing. Acta Med Okayama 2010; 64 (05) 331-338