Download PDF
J Wrist Surg 2020; 09(02): 141-149
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-3402769
Scientific Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Factors Associated with Scaphoid Nonunion following Early Open Reduction and Internal Fixation

Pooja Prabhakar
1   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
,
Lauren Wessel
2   Department of Hand and Upper Extremity Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York
,
Joseph Nguyen
3   Department of Biostatistics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York
,
Jeffrey Stepan
2   Department of Hand and Upper Extremity Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York
,
Michelle Carlson
2   Department of Hand and Upper Extremity Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York
,
Duretti Fufa
2   Department of Hand and Upper Extremity Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

30 June 2019

02 December 2019

Publication Date:
20 January 2020 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background Nonunion after open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of scaphoid fractures is reported in 5 to 30% of cases; however, predictors of nonunion are not clearly defined.

Objective The purpose of this study is to determine fracture characteristics and surgical factors which may influence progression to nonunion after scaphoid fracture ORIF.

Patients and Methods We performed a retrospective case–control study of scaphoid fractures treated by early ORIF between 2003 and 2017. Inclusion criteria were surgical fixation within 6 months from date of injury and postoperative CT with minimum clinical follow-up of 6 months to evaluate healing. Forty-eight patients were included in this study. Nonunion cases were matched by age, sex, and fracture location to patients who progressed to fracture union in the 1:2 ratio.

Results This series of 48 patients matched 16 nonunion cases with 32 cases that progressed to union. Fracture location was proximal pole in 15% (7/48) and waist in 85% (41/48). Multivariate regression demonstrated that shorter length of time from injury to initial ORIF and smaller percent of proximal fracture fragment volume were significantly associated with scaphoid nonunion after ORIF (63 vs. 27 days and 34 vs. 40%, respectively). Receiver operating curve analysis revealed that fracture volume below 38% and time from injury to surgery greater than 31 days were associated with nonunion.

Conclusion Increased likelihood for nonunion was found when the fracture was treated greater than 31 days from injury and when fracture volume was less than 38% of the entire scaphoid.

Level of Evidence This is a Level III, therapeutic study.

Keywords

postoperative - scaphoid fracture - nonunion - open reduction internal fixation - open reduction and internal fixation

Ethical Approval

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at the Hospital for Special Surgery. Work was performed at the Hospital for Special Surgery, New York City. There were no outside sources of funding.


 

  • References

  • 1 Hove LM. Epidemiology of scaphoid fractures in Bergen, Norway. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 1999; 33 (04) 423-426
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Freedman DM, Botte MJ, Gelberman RH. Vascularity of the carpus. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001; (383) 47-59
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Mack GR, Bosse MJ, Gelberman RH, Yu E. The natural history of scaphoid non-union. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1984; 66 (04) 504-509
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Daly K, Gill P, Magnussen PA, Simonis RB. Established nonunion of the scaphoid treated by volar wedge grafting and Herbert screw fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1996; 78 (04) 530-534
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Inoue G, Shionoya K, Kuwahata Y. Herbert screw fixation for scaphoid nonunions. An analysis of factors influencing outcome. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1997; (343) 99-106
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Kawamura K, Chung KC. Treatment of scaphoid fractures and nonunions. J Hand Surg Am 2008; 33 (06) 988-997
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Warren-Smith CD, Barton NJ. Non-union of the scaphoid: Russe graft vs Herbert screw. J Hand Surg [Br] 1988; 13 (01) 83-86
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Gelberman RH, Menon J. The vascularity of the scaphoid bone. J Hand Surg Am 1980; 5 (05) 508-513
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Shah J, Jones WA. Factors affecting the outcome in 50 cases of scaphoid nonunion treated with Herbert screw fixation. J Hand Surg [Br] 1998; 23 (05) 680-685
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Steinmann SP, Adams JE. Scaphoid fractures and nonunions: diagnosis and treatment. J Orthop Sci 2006; 11 (04) 424-431
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Taleisnik J, Kelly PJ. The extraosseous and intraosseous blood supply of the scaphoid bone. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1966; 48 (06) 1125-1137
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Ramamurthy C, Cutler L, Nuttall D, Simison AJM, Trail IA, Stanley JK. The factors affecting outcome after non-vascular bone grafting and internal fixation for nonunion of the scaphoid. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007; 89 (05) 627-632
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Lim TK, Kim HK, Koh KH, Lee HI, Woo SJ, Park MJ. Treatment of avascular proximal pole scaphoid nonunions with vascularized distal radius bone grafting. J Hand Surg Am 2013; 38 (10) 1906-12.e1
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Rancy SK, Swanstrom MM, DiCarlo EF, Sneag DB, Lee SK, Wolfe SW. ; Scaphoid Nonunion Consortium. Success of scaphoid nonunion surgery is independent of proximal pole vascularity. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2018; 43 (01) 32-40
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Nakamura R, Horii E, Watanabe K, Tsunoda K, Miura T. Scaphoid non-union: factors affecting the functional outcome of open reduction and wedge grafting with Herbert screw fixation. J Hand Surg [Br] 1993; 18 (02) 219-224
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Schuind F, Haentjens P, Van Innis F, Vander Maren C, Garcia-Elias M, Sennwald G. Prognostic factors in the treatment of carpal scaphoid nonunions. J Hand Surg Am 1999; 24 (04) 761-776
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Trezies AJH, Davis TRC, Barton NJ. Factors influencing the outcome of bone grafting surgery for scaphoid fracture non-union. Injury 2000; 31 (08) 605-607
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Luchetti TJ, Hedroug Y, Fernandez JJ, Cohen MS, Wysocki RW. The morphology of proximal pole scaphoid fractures: implications for optimal screw placement. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2018; 43 (01) 73-79
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Luria S, Hoch S, Liebergall M, Mosheiff R, Peleg E. Optimal fixation of acute scaphoid fractures: finite element analysis. J Hand Surg Am 2010; 35 (08) 1246-1250
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Swanstrom MM, Morse KW, Lipman JD, Hearns KA, Carlson MG. Effect of screw perpendicularity on compression in scaphoid waist fractures. J Wrist Surg 2017; 6 (03) 178-182
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Swanstrom MM, Morse KW, Lipman JD, Hearns KA, Carlson MG. Variable bone density of scaphoid: importance of subchondral screw placement. J Wrist Surg 2018; 7 (01) 66-70
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Grewal R, Assini J, Sauder D, Ferreira L, Johnson J, Faber K. A comparison of two headless compression screws for operative treatment of scaphoid fractures. J Orthop Surg Res 2011; 6 (01) 27
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Hart A, Harvey EJ, Rabiei R, Barthelat F, Martineau PA. Fixation strength of four headless compression screws. Med Eng Phys 2016; 38 (10) 1037-1043
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Mandaleson A, Tham SK, Lewis C, Ackland DC, Ek ET. Scaphoid fracture fixation in a nonunion model: a biomechanical study comparing 3 types of fixation. J Hand Surg Am 2018; 43 (03) 221-228
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 McCallister WV, Knight J, Kaliappan R, Trumble TE. Central placement of the screw in simulated fractures of the scaphoid waist: a biomechanical study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003; 85 (01) 72-77
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Hart A, Harvey EJ, Lefebvre LP, Barthelat F, Rabiei R, Martineau PA. Insertion profiles of 4 headless compression screws. J Hand Surg Am 2013; 38 (09) 1728-1734
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Dodds SD, Panjabi MM, Slade III JF. Screw fixation of scaphoid fractures: a biomechanical assessment of screw length and screw augmentation. J Hand Surg Am 2006; 31 (03) 405-413
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Luria S, Schwarcz Y, Wollstein R, Emelife P, Zinger G, Peleg E. 3-dimensional analysis of scaphoid fracture angle morphology. J Hand Surg Am 2015; 40 (03) 508-514
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Schwarcz Y, Schwarcz Y, Peleg E, Joskowicz L, Wollstein R, Luria S. Three-dimensional analysis of acute scaphoid fracture displacement: proximal extension deformity of the scaphoid. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2017; 99 (02) 141-149
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Leventhal EL, Wolfe SW, Walsh EF, Crisco JJ. A computational approach to the “optimal” screw axis location and orientation in the scaphoid bone. J Hand Surg Am 2009; 34 (04) 677-684
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Leslie IJ, Dickson RA. The fractured carpal scaphoid. Natural history and factors influencing outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1981; 63-B (02) 225-230
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Herbert TJ. The fractured scaphoid. St. Louis quality. Medical Publishing 1990; 57
    PubMedGoogle Scholar