PDF herunterladen
Facial Plast Surg 2021; 37(01): 053-064
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1723827
Original Article

Guidelines for Dorsum Preservation in Primary Rhinoplasty

Yves Saban
1   Facial Plastic Surgery, FPS and Maxillofacial, Nice, France
,
Sylvie de Salvador
2   Department of Rhinoplasty, FPS Center, Nice, France
› Institutsangaben
› Weitere Informationen
Auch verfügbar auf
   Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

The multiplication of scientific articles related to the fast-growing interest in preservation rhinoplasty (PR) may lead to confusion in the decision-making process, thus requiring a need for guidelines through a focus on benefit–risk ratio and revisions. This study analyzes a 352 consecutive primary rhinoplasties series during a 3 year (2016 to 2019) period with 1-year follow-up. The evaluation of the most appropriate procedure to the patient's nasal anatomy and expectations requires to correlate (1) a convenient classification of nasal profile lines; (2) a review of the dorsum preservation techniques (DP) classified as: full DP, DP + resurfacing, bony cartilaginous disarticulation, and finally traditional rhinoplasty; (3) the role of septoplasties, subdividing this series in two main groups; (4) analyzing the revisions in the different subgroups and to the literature. Thirty-five revisions (9.94%) were done. Correlations between profile lines, surgical procedures, and revisions show (1) 129 straight noses underwent full DP in 88 cases with 5.68% revisions; however, DP+ hump resurfacing in 32 patients with no revision. (2) Among 71 tension noses, 33 underwent full DP with 6 revisions (18.18%), while 32 patients had bony cap resurfacing, 1 revision (3.13%). (3) Among 109 kyphotic noses, 64 patients underwent DP + resurfacing with 10 revisions (15.63%); 27 patients had cartilage-only DP with two revisions (7.41%). (4) In the 43 difficult noses group, revisions were done equally in DP + resurfacing and cartilage-only subgroups. Septum stability modifies the correlations, introducing Cottle's septorhinoplasty in the paradigm. The revision rate is jumping ×2.50% when a septoplasty is associated with the rhinoplasty. Correlated to the benefit–risk ratio and the revisions, the following guidelines may be suggested in primary rhinoplasty: (1) Straight noses: full DP, (2) tension noses: DP + dorsum resurfacing and/or Cottle's variations, (3) kyphotic noses: cartilage-only DP, and (4) difficult noses: traditional rhinoplasties.

Keywords

guidelines - preservation rhinoplasty - primary rhinoplasty - dorsum preservation - revision


Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
25. Februar 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Goodale JL. A new method for the operative correction of the exaggerated Roman nose. Boston Med Surg J 1899; 140: 112
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 2 Daniel RK. The preservation rhinoplasty: a new rhinoplasty revolution. Aesthet Surg J 2018; 38 (02) 228-229
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 3 Saban Y, Daniel RK, Polselli R, Trapasso M, Palhazi P. Dorsal preservation: the push down technique reassessed. Aesthet Surg J 2018; 38 (02) 117-131
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 4 Saban Y. Choosing the appropriate preservation rhinoplasty procedure. EAFPS Live webinars. 2020 June 20th; Accessed December 25, 2020 https://eafps.org/video/members-only/
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 5 Apaydin F. EAFPS round table. Live webinars. 2020 April 30th; Accessed December 25, 2020 https://eafps.org/video/members-only/
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 6 Tüncel U, Aydogdu O. The probable reasons for dorsal hump problems following let-d /push-down rhinoplasty and solution proposals. Plast Reconstr Surg 2019; 144 (03) 378e-385e
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 7 Tüncel U, Aydogdu IO, Kurt A. Reducing dorsal hump recurrence following push down-let down rhinoplasty. Aesthet Surg J 2020; sjaa145
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 8 Santos M, Rego AR, Coutinho M, Sousa CAE, Ferreira MG. Spare roof technique in reduction rhinoplasty: Prospective study of the first one hundred patients. Laryngoscope 2019; 129 (12) 2702-2706
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 9 Abdelwahab MA, Neves CA, Patel PN, Most SP. Impact of dorsal preservation rhinoplasty versus dorsal hump resection on the internal nasal valve: a quantitative radiological study. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2020; 44 (03) 879-887
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 10 Stergiou G, Tremp M, Finocchi V, Saban Y. Functional and radiological assessment after preservation rhinoplasty - A clinical study. In Vivo 2020; 34 (05) 2659-2665
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 11 Sadri A, East C, Badia L, Saban Y. Dorsal Preservation Rhinoplasty: one beam computed tomography analysis of the nasal vault, septum, and skull base-its role in surgical planning. Facial Plast Surg 2020; 36 (03) 329-334
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 12 Neves JC, Arancibia Tagle D, Dewes W, Larrabbee Jr W. The split preservation rhinoplasty: “the Vitruvian Man split maneuver. Eur J Plast Surg 2020; 43: 323-333
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 13 Lazovic GD, Daniel RK, Janosevic LB, Kosanovic RM, Colic MM, Kosins AM. Rhinoplasty: the nasal bones - anatomy and analysis. Aesthet Surg J 2015; 35 (03) 255-263
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 14 Saban Y, Braccini F, Polselli R. Morphodynamic anatomy of the nose. In: Saban Y, Braccini F, Polselli R, Micheli-Pellegrini V. eds. Rhinoplasties; The Monographs of CCA Group n°32. Paris: CCA Group; 2002: 25-32 (English and French)
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 15 Saban Y, Braccini F, Polselli R. [Rhinoplasty: morphodynamic anatomy of rhinoplasty. Interest of conservative rhinoplasty]. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord) 2006; 127 (1-2): 15-22 (French)
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 16 Saban Y, Polselli R, Perrone F. Rhinoplastie conservatrice à toit fermé. In: Bessede JP. ed. Chirurgie plastique esthétique de la face et du cou. Elsevier-masson; 2012. Vol 2. 309-321 (French)
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 17 Gola R, Nerini A, Laurent-Fyon C, Waller PY. [Conservative rhinoplasty of the nasal canopy]. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 1989; 34 (06) 465-475 (French)
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 18 Saban Y. Step by step closed rhinoplasty with dorsum preservation. In: Saban Y, Çakir B, Daniel RK, Palhazi P. eds. Preservation Rhinoplasty. 2nd edition.. Istanbul, Budapest: Septum Publishing; 2019: 251-265
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 19 Saban Y, De Salvador S, Polselli R. Revisions following dorsal preservation rhinoplasties. In: Daniel RK, Palhazi P, Saban Y, Çakir B. eds. Preservation Rhinoplasty. 3rd edition.. Istanbul: Septum; 2020: 404-429
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 20 Göksel A, Saban Y. Open piezo preservation rhinoplasty: a case report of the new rhinoplasty approach. Facial Plast Surg 2019; 35 (01) 113-118
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 21 Ishida J, Ishida LC, Ishida LH, Vieira JCM, Ferreira MC. Treatment of the nasal hump with preservation of the cartilaginous framework. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 103 (06) 1729-1733 , discussion 1734–1735
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 22 Boulanger N, Baumann C, Beurton R. et al. Septorhinoplasty by disarticulation: early assessment of a new technique for morphological correction of crooked noses. Rhinology 2013; 51 (01) 77-87
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 23 Jankowski R. Septoplastie et Rhinoplastie par Désarticulation. Issy-les-Moulineaux, France: Elsevier Masson; 2016
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 24 Ferreira MG, Monteiro D, Reis C, Almeida e Sousa C. Spare roof technique: a middle third new technique. Facial Plast Surg 2016; 32 (01) 111-116
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 25 Saban Y. Algorithm for dorsal modification and osteotomies. Paper presented at: 4th International Course on Functional and Aesthetic Surgery of the Nose, October 14–17, 2012 Imola:
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 26 Cottle MH. Nasal roof repair and hump removal. AMA Arch Otolaryngol 1954; 60 (04) 408-414
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 27 Killian G. The submucous window resection of the nasal septum. Ann Otolaryngol 1905; 14: 362-369
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 28 Gubisch W. The extracorporeal septum plasty: a technique to correct difficult nasal deformities. Plast Reconstr Surg 1995; 95 (04) 672-682
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 29 Kosins AM. Expanding indications for dorsal preservation rhinoplasty with cartilage conversion techniques. Aesthet Surg J 2020; sjaa071
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 30 Saban Y. Rhinoplasty: lessons from “errors”: from anatomy and experience to the concept of sequential primary rhinoplasty. HNO 2018; 66 (01) 15-25
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 31 Saban Y. Preservation septoplasty and rhinoplasty in deviated noses. In: Çakir B, Saban Y, Daniel RK, Palhazi P. eds. Preservation Rhinoplasty. 1st edition.. Istanbul, Turkey: Septum Publishing; 2018: 295-315
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 32 Ishida LC, Ishida J, Ishida LH. et al. Nasal Hump Treatment With Cartilaginous Push-Down and Preservation of the Bony Cap. Aesth Surg J 2020; 40 (11) 1168-1178
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 33 Kovacevic M. Refinements in Dorsal Preservation. In: Saban Y, Çakir B, Daniel RK, Palhazi P. eds. Preservation Rhinoplasty. 2nd edition.. Istanbul, Budapest: Septum Publishing; 2019: 357-363
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 34 Barelli PA. Long term evaluation of “push down” procedures. Rhinology 1975; 13 (01) 25-32
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 35 Ferraz M, Zappelini CEM, de Cavalho GM, Guimães AC, Chone CT, Dewes W. Conservative surgery of the nasal dorsum: the philosophy of the septal pyramid adjusting and repositioning (S.P.A.R.). Rev Bras Cir 2013;42(03):
  • 36 Kovacevic M. Refinements in dorsal preservation. In: Daniel RK, Palhazi P, Saban Y, Çakir B. eds. Preservation Rhinoplasty. 3rd edition,. Istanbul, Turkey: Septum; 2020: 313-325
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 37 Toriumi D. EAFPS 43rd annual meeting. Joseph lecture. Live webinars. 2020 September 20 th ; Accessed December 25, 2020 https://eafps.org/video/members-only/
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 38 Göksel A. Piezo assisted Let Down Rhinoplasty. In: Daniel RK, Palhazi P, Saban Y, Çakir B. eds. Preservation Rhinoplasty. 3rd edition.. Istanbul: Septum; 2020: 216-241
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 39 Kosins A, Daniel RK. Decision making in preservation rhinoplasty. A 100-case series with one-year follow-up. Aesthet Surg J 2020; 40 (01) 34-48
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar