PDF herunterladen
J Knee Surg 2022; 35(13): 1393-1400
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1723968
Original Article

Occupational Outcomes and Revision Rates for Medial Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty in U.S. Military Servicemembers

Marina Rodriguez
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, William Beaumont Army Medical Center, El Paso, Texas
,
Ken Heida
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, William Beaumont Army Medical Center, El Paso, Texas
,
Danielle E. Rider 
2   Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
,
Gens P. Goodman
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, William Beaumont Army Medical Center, El Paso, Texas
,
Brian R. Waterman
3   Division of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
,
Philip J. Belmont Jr.
4   Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland
› Institutsangaben Funding None.
› Weitere Informationen
   Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

This study evaluates return to work and revision rates for medial unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA) in a high-demand military cohort. Patient demographic and clinical variables were isolated from the medical records of active-duty military servicemembers with at least 2 years of postoperative follow-up and correlated with return to work, medial UKA survivorship, and perioperative complications. The medial UKA annual revision rate was calculated as the percentage of implants revised per observed component year. A total of 39 servicemembers underwent 46 primary medial UKAs (32 unilateral and 7 bilateral) with a mean follow-up of 3.9 (2.0–6.6) years. At a minimum of 2 years postoperatively, 33 (85%) servicemembers returned to military service or successfully completed their service obligation. Older servicemembers (odds ratio [OR] = 0.67; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.45, 0.99) had a significantly decreased OR for knee-related medical separation. Nine servicemembers (20%) had conversion to TKA at an average of 2.4 (range, 0.6–5.6) years with a medial UKA annual revision rate of 5%. When compared with Navy/Air Force, Army/Marine servicemembers had an increased TKA conversion rate (OR = 5.40; 95% CI: 1.13, 25.81). Older age decreased the likelihood of medical separation and Army/Marines service was the sole risk factor associated with conversion to TKA. The level of evidence is IV, therapeutic case series.

Keywords

unicompartmental knee arthroplasty - work - military - occupation - functional outcomes

Note

The findings presented in this manuscript have not been previously presented.




Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 29. April 2020

Angenommen: 02. Januar 2021

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
19. Februar 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Duncan R, Peat G, Thomas E, Wood L, Hay E, Croft P. How do pain and function vary with compartmental distribution and severity of radiographic knee osteoarthritis?. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2008; 47 (11) 1704-1707
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Sowers M, Karvonen-Gutierrez CA, Jacobson JA, Jiang Y, Yosef M. Associations of anatomical measures from MRI with radiographically defined knee osteoarthritis score, pain, and physical functioning. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011; 93 (03) 241-251
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Sandmark H, Vingård E. Sports and risk for severe osteoarthrosis of the knee. Scand J Med Sci Sports 1999; 9 (05) 279-284
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Spector TD, Harris PA, Hart DJ. et al. Risk of osteoarthritis associated with long-term weight-bearing sports: a radiologic survey of the hips and knees in female ex-athletes and population controls. Arthritis Rheum 1996; 39 (06) 988-995
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Coggon D, Croft P, Kellingray S, Barrett D, McLaren M, Cooper C. Occupational physical activities and osteoarthritis of the knee. Arthritis Rheum 2000; 43 (07) 1443-1449
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Ezzat AM, Cibere J, Koehoorn M, Li LC. Association between cumulative joint loading from occupational activities and knee osteoarthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2013; 65 (10) 1634-1642
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Muraki S, Oka H, Akune T. et al. Association of occupational activity with joint space narrowing and osteophytosis in the medial compartment of the knee: the ROAD study (OAC5914R2). Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2011; 19 (07) 840-846
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Wang Y, Simpson JA, Wluka AE. et al. Is physical activity a risk factor for primary knee or hip replacement due to osteoarthritis? A prospective cohort study. J Rheumatol 2011; 38 (02) 350-357
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Cameron KL, Hsiao MS, Owens BD, Burks R, Svoboda SJ. Incidence of physician-diagnosed osteoarthritis among active duty United States military service members. Arthritis Rheum 2011; 63 (10) 2974-2982
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Showery JE, Kusnezov NA, Dunn JC, Bader JO, Belmont Jr PJ, Waterman BR. The rising incidence of degenerative and posttraumatic osteoarthritis of the knee in the United States military. J Arthroplasty 2016; 31 (10) 2108-2114
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Cross JD, Ficke JR, Hsu JR, Masini BD, Wenke JC. Battlefield orthopaedic injuries cause the majority of long-term disabilities. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2011; 19 (Suppl. 01) S1-S7
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Patzkowski JC, Rivera JC, Ficke JR, Wenke JC. The changing face of disability in the US Army: the Operation Enduring Freedom and Operation Iraqi Freedom effect. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2012; 20 (Suppl. 01) S23-S30
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Schoenfeld AJ, Goodman GP, Burks R, Black MA, Nelson JH, Belmont Jr PJ. The influence of musculoskeletal conditions, behavioral health diagnoses and socio-economic status on injury-related outcome in a high-demand population. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2014; 96 (13) e106
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Duchman KR, Gao Y, Pugely AJ, Martin CT, Callaghan JJ. Differences in short-term complications between unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty: a propensity score matched analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2014; 96 (16) 1387-1394
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Lombardi Jr AV, Berend KR, Walter CA, Aziz-Jacobo J, Cheney NA, Cheney NA. Is recovery faster for mobile-bearing unicompartmental than total knee arthroplasty?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009; 467 (06) 1450-1457
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Lygre SH, Espehaug B, Havelin LI, Furnes O, Vollset SE. Pain and function in patients after primary unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010; 92 (18) 2890-2897
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Lyons MC, MacDonald SJ, Somerville LE, Naudie DD, McCalden RW. Unicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty database analysis: is there a winner?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012; 470 (01) 84-90
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Newman J, Pydisetty RV, Ackroyd C. Unicompartmental or total knee replacement: the 15-year results of a prospective randomised controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009; 91 (01) 52-57
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 van der List JP, Chawla H, Villa JC, Pearle AD. The role of patient characteristics on the choice of unicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty in patients with medial osteoarthritis. J Arthroplasty 2017; 32 (03) 761-766
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Walton NP, Jahromi I, Lewis PL, Dobson PJ, Angel KR, Campbell DG. Patient-perceived outcomes and return to sport and work: TKA versus mini-incision unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 2006; 19 (02) 112-116
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Zuiderbaan HA, van der List JP, Khamaisy S. et al. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty versus total knee arthroplasty: which type of artificial joint do patients forget?. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2017; 25 (03) 681-686
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Börjesson M, Weidenhielm L, Mattsson E, Olsson E. Gait and clinical measurements in patients with knee osteoarthritis after surgery: a prospective 5-year follow-up study. Knee 2005; 12 (02) 121-127
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Krych AJ, Reardon P, Sousa P, Pareek A, Stuart M, Pagnano M. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty provides higher activity and durability than valgus-producing proximal tibial osteotomy at 5 to 7 years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2017; 99 (02) 113-122
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Stukenborg-Colsman C, Wirth CJ, Lazovic D, Wefer A. High tibial osteotomy versus unicompartmental joint replacement in unicompartmental knee joint osteoarthritis: 7-10-year follow-up prospective randomised study. Knee 2001; 8 (03) 187-194
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 W-Dahl A, Robertsson O, Lidgren L. Surgery for knee osteoarthritis in younger patients. Acta Orthop 2010; 81 (02) 161-164
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Nwachukwu BU, McCormick FM, Schairer WW, Frank RM, Provencher MT, Roche MW. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty versus high tibial osteotomy: United States practice patterns for the surgical treatment of unicompartmental arthritis. J Arthroplasty 2014; 29 (08) 1586-1589
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Biswas D, Van Thiel GS, Wetters NG, Pack BJ, Berger RA, Della Valle CJ. Medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients less than 55 years old: minimum of two years of follow-up. J Arthroplasty 2014; 29 (01) 101-105
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Craik JD, El Shafie SA, Singh VK, Twyman RS. Revision of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty versus primary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2015; 30 (04) 592-594
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Ghomrawi HM, Eggman AA, Pearle AD. Effect of age on cost-effectiveness of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty compared with total knee arthroplasty in the U.S. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2015; 97 (05) 396-402
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Jonas SC, Shah R, Mitra A, Deo SD. 5-Year cost/benefit analysis of revision of failed unicompartmental knee replacements (UKRs); not “just” a primary total knee replacement (TKR). Knee 2014; 21 (04) 840-842
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Baker P, Jameson S, Critchley R, Reed M, Gregg P, Deehan D. Center and surgeon volume influence the revision rate following unicondylar knee replacement: an analysis of 23,400 medial cemented unicondylar knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2013; 95 (08) 702-709
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Liddle AD, Judge A, Pandit H, Murray DW. Determinants of revision and functional outcome following unicompartmental knee replacement. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2014; 22 (09) 1241-1250
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Naal FD, Fischer M, Preuss A. et al. Return to sports and recreational activity after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Am J Sports Med 2007; 35 (10) 1688-1695
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Hopper GP, Leach WJ. Participation in sporting activities following knee replacement: total versus unicompartmental. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2008; 16 (10) 973-979
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Witjes S, Gouttebarge V, Kuijer PP, van Geenen RC, Poolman RW, Kerkhoffs GM. Return to sports and physical activity after total and unicondylar knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med 2016; 46 (02) 269-292
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Glebus GP, Feather TW, Hsu JR, Gerlinger TL. Return to duty and deployment after major joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2013; 28 (08) 1270-1273
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Chawla H, Ghomrawi HM, van der List JP, Eggman AA, Zuiderbaan HA, Pearle AD. Establishing age-specific cost-effective annual revision rates for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. J Arthroplasty 2017; 32 (01) 326-335
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Air Force Instruction 48-123: Aerospace Medicine Medical Examination and Standards. Washington, DC: Department of the Air Force; 2009
    Google Scholar
  • 39 Army Regulation 40-501: Standards of Medical Fitness. Washington, DC: Department of the Army; 2011
    Google Scholar
  • 40 Medical examinations. In: Manual of the Medical Department (MANMED), NAVMED P-117. Washington, DC: Department of the Navy; 2014
    Google Scholar
  • 41 Department of the Army Pamphlet 611-21: Military Occupational Classification and Structure. Washington, DC: Department of the Army; 2018
    Google Scholar
  • 42 Singh JA, Vessely MB, Harmsen WS. et al. A population-based study of trends in the use of total hip and total knee arthroplasty, 1969-2008. Mayo Clin Proc 2010; 85 (10) 898-904
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Foote JA, Smith HK, Jonas SC, Greenwood R, Weale AE. Return to work following knee arthroplasty. Knee 2010; 17 (01) 19-22
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Dictionary of Occupational Titles – 4th ed., revised. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Administrative Law Judges; 1991 . Accessed September 12, 2016 at: www.oalj.gov/public/dot/refernces/dotappc.htm
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Lombardi Jr AV, Nunley RM, Berend KR. et al. Do patients return to work after total knee arthroplasty?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014; 472 (01) 138-146
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Belmont Jr PJ, Heida K, Keeney JA, Hamilton W, Burks R, Waterman BR. Return to work and functional outcomes following primary total knee arthroplasty in U.S. military servicemembers. J Arthroplasty 2015; 30 (06) 968-972
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Hubertsson J, Petersson IF, Thorstensson CA, Englund M. Risk of sick leave and disability pension in working-age women and men with knee osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2013; 72 (03) 401-405
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 van der List JP, Zuiderbaan HA, Pearle AD, Pearle AD. Why do medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasties fail today?. J Arthroplasty 2016; 31 (05) 1016-1021
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Hang JR, Stanford TE, Graves SE, Davidson DC, de Steiger RN, Miller LN. Outcome of revision of unicompartmental knee replacement. Acta Orthop 2010; 81 (01) 95-98
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Robertsson O, W-Dahl A. The risk of revision after TKA is affected by previous HTO or UKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015; 473 (01) 90-93
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Pearse AJ, Hooper GJ, Rothwell A, Frampton C. Survival and functional outcome after revision of a unicompartmental to a total knee replacement: the New Zealand National Joint Registry. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2010; 92 (04) 508-512
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Scott CE, Bugler KE, Clement ND, MacDonald D, Howie CR, Biant LC. Patient expectations of arthroplasty of the hip and knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2012; 94 (07) 974-981
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Witjes S, van Geenen RC, Koenraadt KL. et al. Expectations of younger patients concerning activities after knee arthroplasty: are we asking the right questions?. Qual Life Res 2017; 26 (02) 403-417
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Bardgett M, Lally J, Malviya A, Deehan D. Return to work after knee replacement: a qualitative study of patient experiences. BMJ Open 2016; 6 (02) e007912
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Mancuso CA, Graziano S, Briskie LM. et al. Randomized trials to modify patients' preoperative expectations of hip and knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008; 466 (02) 424-431
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Clyde CT, Goyal N, Matar WY, Witmer D, Restrepo C, Hozack WJ. Workers' Compensation patients after total joint arthroplasty: do they return to work?. J Arthroplasty 2013; 28 (06) 883-887
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar