CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo) 2022; 57(01): 014-022
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1731357
Artigo de Atualização
Artroscopia e Traumatologia do Esporte

Limites da artroscopia na instabilidade anterior do ombro

Artikel in mehreren Sprachen: português | English
1   Hospital Santa Rita, Vitória, ES, Brasil
,
1   Hospital Santa Rita, Vitória, ES, Brasil
› Institutsangaben

Resumo

Muito se discute sobre os limites do tratamento da instabilidade anterior do ombro por artroscopia. O avanço no entendimento das repercussões biomecânicas das lesões bipolares sobre a estabilidade do ombro, bem como na identificação de fatores relacionados ao maior risco de recidiva têm nos ajudado a definir, de forma mais apurada, os limites do reparo por via artroscópica.

Ressaltamos a importância de diferenciação entre perda óssea por erosão da glenoide (POAG) e fraturas da borda da glenoide, pois o prognóstico do tratamento diverge entre essas formas de falha óssea da glenoide. Neste contexto, entendemos que há três tipos de falha óssea: a) Bankart ósseo (fratura); b) combinada; e c) POAG, e abordaremos as opções de tratamento sugerido em cada situação.

Até há pouco tempo, a escolha do método cirúrgico era norteada basicamente pelo grau de acometimento ósseo. Com a evolução do conhecimento, da biomecânica das lesões bipolares e do conceito do glenoid track (trilho da glenoide), o ponto de corte da lesão crítica, vem sendo alterado com tendência de queda. Além das falhas ou perdas ósseas, outras variáveis foram adicionadas e tornaram a decisão mais complexa, porém um pouco mais objetiva.

O presente artigo de atualização tem como objetivo fazer uma breve revisão da anatomia com as principais lesões encontradas na instabilidade; abordar detalhes importantes na técnica cirúrgica artroscópica, em especial nos casos complexos, e trazer as evidências atuais sobre os assuntos de maior divergência, buscando guiar o cirurgião na tomada de decisão.



Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 07. Dezember 2020

Angenommen: 15. April 2021

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
25. Oktober 2021

© 2021. Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil

 
  • Referências

  • 1 Locher J, Wilken F, Beitzel K. et al. Hill-Sachs Off-track Lesions as Risk Factor for Recurrence of Instability After Arthroscopic Bankart Repair. Arthroscopy 2016; 32 (10) 1993-1999
  • 2 Pogorzelski J, Fritz EM, Horan MP, Katthagen JC, Provencher MT, Millett PJ. Failure following arthroscopic Bankart repair for traumatic anteroinferior instability of the shoulder: is a glenoid labral articular disruption (GLAD) lesion a risk factor for recurrent instability?. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2018; 27 (08) e235-e242
  • 3 Leroux TS, Saltzman BM, Meyer M. et al. The Influence of Evidence-Based Surgical Indications and Techniques on Failure Rates After Arthroscopic Shoulder Stabilization in the Contact or Collision Athlete With Anterior Shoulder Instability. Am J Sports Med 2017; 45 (05) 1218-1225
  • 4 Streubel PN, Krych AJ, Simone JP. et al. Anterior glenohumeral instability: a pathology-based surgical treatment strategy. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2014; 22 (05) 283-294
  • 5 Bankart AS. Recurrent or habitual dislocation of the shoulder-joint. BMJ 1923; 2 (3285): 1132-1133
  • 6 Greis PE, Scuderi MG, Mohr A, Bachus KN, Burks RT. Glenohumeral articular contact areas and pressures following labral and osseous injury to the anteroinferior quadrant of the glenoid. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2002; 11 (05) 442-451
  • 7 Stefko JM, Tibone JE, Cawley PW, ElAttrache NE, McMahon PJ. Strain of the anterior band of the inferior glenohumeral ligament during capsule failure. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1997; 6 (05) 473-479
  • 8 Neviaser TJ. The GLAD lesion: another cause of anterior shoulder pain. Arthroscopy 1993; 9 (01) 22-23
  • 9 Ozbaydar M, Elhassan B, Diller D, Massimini D, Higgins LD, Warner JJ. Results of arthroscopic capsulolabral repair: Bankart lesion versus anterior labroligamentous periosteal sleeve avulsion lesion. Arthroscopy 2008; 24 (11) 1277-1283
  • 10 Yiannakopoulos CK, Mataragas E, Antonogiannakis E. A comparison of the spectrum of intra-articular lesions in acute and chronic anterior shoulder instability. Arthroscopy 2007; 23 (09) 985-990
  • 11 Ilahi OA, Labbe MR, Cosculluela P. Variants of the anterosuperior glenoid labrum and associated pathology. Arthroscopy 2002; 18 (08) 882-886
  • 12 Williams MM, Snyder SJ, Buford Jr D. The Buford complex--the “cord-like” middle glenohumeral ligament and absent anterosuperior labrum complex: a normal anatomic capsulolabral variant. Arthroscopy 1994; 10 (03) 241-247
  • 13 Schmiddem U, Watson A, Perriman D, Liodakis E, Page R. Arthroscopic repair of HAGL lesions yields good clinical results, but may not allow return to former level of sport. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2019; 27 (10) 3246-3253
  • 14 Bhatia DN, DasGupta B. Surgical treatment of significant glenoid bone defects and associated humeral avulsions of glenohumeral ligament (HAGL) lesions in anterior shoulder instability. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2013; 21 (07) 1603-1609
  • 15 Sugaya H, Moriishi J, Dohi M, Kon Y, Tsuchiya A. Glenoid rim morphology in recurrent anterior glenohumeral instability. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003; 85 (05) 878-884
  • 16 Sugaya H, Moriishi J, Kanisawa I, Tsuchiya A. Arthroscopic osseous Bankart repair for chronic recurrent traumatic anterior glenohumeral instability. Surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006; 88 (Suppl 1 Pt 2): 159-169
  • 17 Jiang CY, Zhu YM, Liu X, Li FL, Lu Y, Wu G. Do reduction and healing of the bony fragment really matter in arthroscopic bony Bankart reconstruction?: a prospective study with clinical and computed tomography evaluations. Am J Sports Med 2013; 41 (11) 2617-2623
  • 18 Kitayama S, Sugaya H, Takahashi N. et al. Clinical Outcome and Glenoid Morphology After Arthroscopic Repair of Chronic Osseous Bankart Lesions: A Five to Eight-Year Follow-up Study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2015; 97 (22) 1833-1843
  • 19 Yamamoto N, Muraki T, Sperling JW. et al. Stabilizing mechanism in bone-grafting of a large glenoid defect. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010; 92 (11) 2059-2066
  • 20 Burkhart SS, Debeer JF, Tehrany AM, Parten PM. Quantifying glenoid bone loss arthroscopically in shoulder instability. Arthroscopy 2002; 18 (05) 488-491
  • 21 Bigliani LU, Newton PM, Steinmann SP, Connor PM, Mcllveen SJ. Glenoid rim lesions associated with recurrent anterior dislocation of the shoulder. Am J Sports Med 1998; 26 (01) 41-45
  • 22 Shaha JS, Cook JB, Song DJ. et al. Redefining “Critical” Bone Loss in Shoulder Instability: Functional Outcomes Worsen With “Subcritical” Bone Loss. Am J Sports Med 2015; 43 (07) 1719-1725
  • 23 Shin SJ, Kim RG, Jeon YS, Kwon TH. Critical Value of Anterior Glenoid Bone Loss That Leads to Recurrent Glenohumeral Instability After Arthroscopic Bankart Repair. Am J Sports Med 2017; 45 (09) 1975-1981
  • 24 Willemot LB, Elhassan BT, Verborgt O. Bony Reconstruction of the Anterior Glenoid Rim. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2018; 26 (10) e207-e218
  • 25 Gowd AK, Liu JN, Cabarcas BC. et al. Management of Recurrent Anterior Shoulder Instability With Bipolar Bone Loss: A Systematic Review to Assess Critical Bone Loss Amounts. Am J Sports Med 2019; 47 (10) 2484-2493
  • 26 Di Giacomo G, Pugliese M, Lie DTT. et al. How to handle minor and major bone loss in the shoulder? Current concepts. J ISAKOS 2020; 5 (03) 117-122
  • 27 Provencher MT, Frank RM, Leclere LE. et al. The Hill-Sachs lesion: diagnosis, classification, and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2012; 20 (04) 242-252
  • 28 Purchase RJ, Wolf EM, Hobgood ER, Pollock ME, Smalley CC. Hill-sachs “remplissage”: an arthroscopic solution for the engaging hill-sachs lesion. Arthroscopy 2008; 24 (06) 723-726
  • 29 Wolf EM, Arianjam A. Hill-Sachs remplissage, an arthroscopic solution for the engaging Hill-Sachs lesion: 2- to 10-year follow-up and incidence of recurrence. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2014; 23 (06) 814-820
  • 30 Di Giacomo G, Itoi E, Burkhart SS. Evolving concept of bipolar bone loss and the Hill-Sachs lesion: from “engaging/non-engaging” lesion to “on-track/off-track” lesion. Arthroscopy 2014; 30 (01) 90-98
  • 31 Porcellini G, Paladini P, Campi F, Paganelli M. Shoulder instability and related rotator cuff tears: arthroscopic findings and treatment in patients aged 40 to 60 years. Arthroscopy 2006; 22 (03) 270-276
  • 32 Nakagawa S, Ozaki R, Take Y, Mae T, Hayashida K. Bone fragment union and remodeling after arthroscopic bony bankart repair for traumatic anterior shoulder instability with a glenoid defect: influence on postoperative recurrence of instability. Am J Sports Med 2015; 43 (06) 1438-1447
  • 33 Di Giacomo G, de Gasperis N, Scarso P. Bipolar bone defect in the shoulder anterior dislocation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2016; 24 (02) 479-488
  • 34 Omori Y, Yamamoto N, Koishi H. et al. Measurement of the Glenoid Track In Vivo as Investigated by 3-Dimensional Motion Analysis Using Open MRI. Am J Sports Med 2014; 42 (06) 1290-1295
  • 35 Yamamoto N, Itoi E, Abe H. et al. Contact between the glenoid and the humeral head in abduction, external rotation, and horizontal extension: a new concept of glenoid track. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2007; 16 (05) 649-656
  • 36 Hartzler RU, Bui CNH, Jeong WK. et al. Remplissage of an Off-track Hill-Sachs Lesion Is Necessary to Restore Biomechanical Glenohumeral Joint Stability in a Bipolar Bone Loss Model. Arthroscopy 2016; 32 (12) 2466-2476
  • 37 Song DJ, Cook JB, Krul KP. et al. High frequency of posterior and combined shoulder instability in young active patients. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2015; 24 (02) 186-190
  • 38 Balg F, Boileau P. The instability severity index score. A simple pre-operative score to select patients for arthroscopic or open shoulder stabilisation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007; 89 (11) 1470-1477
  • 39 Liu JN, Gowd AK, Garcia GH, Cvetanovich GL, Cabarcas BC, Verma NN. Recurrence Rate of Instability After Remplissage for Treatment of Traumatic Anterior Shoulder Instability: A Systematic Review in Treatment of Subcritical Glenoid Bone Loss. Arthroscopy 2018; 34 (10) 2894-2907.e2
  • 40 Miyazaki AN, Fregoneze M, Santos PD. et al. Avaliação dos resultados do tratamento cirúrgico artroscópico da luxação traumática anterior de ombro: Primeiro episódio. Rev Bras Ortop 2012; 47 (02) 222-227
  • 41 Seroyer ST, Nho SJ, Provencher MT, Romeo AA. Four-quadrant approach to capsulolabral repair: an arthroscopic road map to the glenoid. Arthroscopy 2010; 26 (04) 555-562 Erratum in: Arthroscopy. 2010;26(6):866
  • 42 Lo IK, Lind CC, Burkhart SS. Glenohumeral arthroscopy portals established using an outside-in technique: neurovascular anatomy at risk. Arthroscopy 2004; 20 (06) 596-602
  • 43 Ciccotti MG, Kuri 2nd JA, Leland JM, Schwartz M, Becker C. A cadaveric analysis of the arthroscopic fixation of anterior and posterior SLAP lesions through a novel lateral transmuscular portal. Arthroscopy 2010; 26 (01) 12-18
  • 44 Simmer Filho J, Pombo EH, de Almeida BPS. A segurança do Portal 5 Horas no tratamento das lesões labiais ântero-inferiores. CBCOC, Búzios-RJ; 2008
  • 45 Boileau P, Villalba M, Héry JY, Balg F, Ahrens P, Neyton L. Risk factors for recurrence of shoulder instability after arthroscopic Bankart repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006; 88 (08) 1755-1763
  • 46 Nho SJ, Provencher MT, Seroyer ST, Romeo AA. Bioabsorbable anchors in glenohumeral shoulder surgery. Arthroscopy 2009; 25 (07) 788-793
  • 47 Knapik DM, Kolaczko JG, Gillespie RJ, Salata MJ, Voos JE. Complications and Return to Activity After Arthroscopic Repair of Isolated Type II SLAP Lesions: A Systematic Review Comparing Knotted Versus Knotless Suture Anchors. Orthop J Sports Med 2020; 8 (04) 2325967120911361
  • 48 Miyazaki AN, Fregoneze M, Santos PD. et al. Avaliação Dos Resultados Do Tratamento Cirúrgico Artroscópico Da Instabilidade Anterior Traumática Do Ombro Com Sutura Da Lesão Na Margem Cruentizada Da Cavidade Glenoidal. Rev Bras Ortop 2012; 47 (03) 318-324
  • 49 Ilahi OA, Al-Fahl T, Bahrani H, Luo ZP. Glenoid suture anchor fixation strength: Effect of insertion angle. Arthroscopy 2004; 20 (06) 609-613
  • 50 Dwyer T, Petrera M, White LM. et al. Trans-subscapularis portal versus low-anterior portal for low anchor placement on the inferior glenoid fossa: a cadaveric shoulder study with computed tomographic analysis. Arthroscopy 2015; 31 (02) 209-214
  • 51 Provencher MT, Verma N, Obopilwe E. et al. A biomechanical analysis of capsular plication versus anchor repair of the shoulder: can the labrum be used as a suture anchor?. Arthroscopy 2008; 24 (02) 210-216
  • 52 Bradley JP, McClincy MP, Arner JW, Tejwani SG. Arthroscopic capsulolabral reconstruction for posterior instability of the shoulder: a prospective study of 200 shoulders. Am J Sports Med 2013; 41 (09) 2005-2014
  • 53 Lädermann A, Arrigoni P, Barth J. et al. Is arthroscopic remplissage a tenodesis or capsulomyodesis? An anatomic study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2016; 24 (02) 573-577
  • 54 França F, Godinho A, Carneiro Leal D. et al. Resultados clínicos e de imagem da abordagem da lesão de Hill-Sachs pela técnica de remplissage na instabilidade anterior do ombro. Rev Bras Ortop 2019; 54 (01) 13-19
  • 55 Yang JS, Mehran N, Mazzocca AD, Pearl ML, Chen VW, Arciero RA. Remplissage Versus Modified Latarjet for Off-Track Hill-Sachs Lesions With Subcritical Glenoid Bone Loss. Am J Sports Med 2018; 46 (08) 1885-1891
  • 56 Elkinson I, Giles JW, Boons HW. et al. The shoulder remplissage procedure for Hill-Sachs defects: does technique matter?. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2013; 22 (06) 835-841
  • 57 Elkinson I, Giles JW, Faber KJ. et al. The effect of the remplissage procedure on shoulder stability and range of motion: an in vitro biomechanical assessment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012; 94 (11) 1003-1012