Download PDF
CC BY 4.0 · World J Nucl Med
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1790570
Original Article

Optimization of Image Quality in Pelvis Lymphoscintigraphy SPECT/CT Using Discovery NM/CT 670

Maryam Ghaneh
1   Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
,
Shahrokh Nasseri
1   Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
,
Ramin Sadeghi 
2   Nuclear Medicine Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
,
Seyed Rasoul Zakavi 
2   Nuclear Medicine Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
,
Habibeh Vosoughi
3   Research Center for Nuclear Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
,
Mehdi Mommennezhad
1   Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
2   Nuclear Medicine Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
› Author Affiliations Funding This study was part of an MSc thesis supported under grant number 4011153 by Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
› Further Information
Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Aim A lymphoscintigraphy is a crucial diagnostic tool for visualizing lymph nodes. This scan plays a significant role in determining the treatment and recovery plan for the patients. Due to the small lymph node size, obtaining high-quality images is important to prevent inaccurate results. We aimed to identify the most effective method for enhancing image quality through postprocessing techniques and altering the image reconstruction process.

Methods Two data sets were utilized in this study. First, National Electrical Manufacturers Association body phantom was filled with [99mTc]Tc-pertechnetate and prepared with and without any activity in the background of the body. Second, the images of 50 patients who underwent single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography imaging received [99mTc]Tc-phytate were collected. Discovery 670 GE gamma camera was used for imaging. Preprocessing of all images was performed by Xeleris and 3DSlicer 5.2.2 software was used for quantification. The effect of image reconstruction parameters such as resolution recovery (RR) algorithm, iteration, subsets, cutoff, and power in Butterworth filter, and full width at half maximum (FWHM) of Gaussian filter was assessed. The image quality index was determined based on contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), contrast, and coefficient of variation.

Results The utilization of the RR algorithm showed notable improvements equal to 74, 35, and 38% of CNR, contrast, and noise reduction, respectively. Significant differences were observed in subiteration of 40 to 112 (p-value < 0.05). The alteration of effective parameters in both smoothing filters yielded statistically significant results, leading to enhanced detectability, reduced noise, and improved contrast simultaneously. Optimum results in terms of noise reduction and CNR were achieved with subiteration (i × s) 4 × 12 using a Gaussian filter with FWHM of 4 or Butterworth filter with power of 10 and cutoff of 1. The highest contrast was observed at subiteration 40 using the Butterworth filter with cutoff of 0.5 and power of 5 or Gaussian filter with 2 mm FWHM. Qualitative analysis by two nuclear medicine specialists validated the quantified image quality.

Conclusion The reconstruction setting involving subiteration 48 with the Butterworth filter using cutoff of 1 and power of 10 or 4 mm FWHM of Gaussian filter produced the highest quality images.

Keywords

lymphoscintigraphy - optimization - image quality - SPECT/CT - image reconstruction


Publication History

Article published online:
26 September 2024

© 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 

  • References

  • 1 Zhang X, Zhao M, Wen L. et al. Sequential SPECT and NIR-II imaging of tumor and sentinel lymph node metastasis for diagnosis and image-guided surgery. Biomater Sci 2021; 9 (08) 3069-3075
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Gien LT, Covens A. Lymph node assessment in cervical cancer: prognostic and therapeutic implications. J Surg Oncol 2009; 99 (04) 242-247
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Lengelé B, Scalliet P. Anatomical bases for the radiological delineation of lymph node areas. Part III: pelvis and lower limbs. Radiother Oncol 2009; 92 (01) 22-33
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Boughey JC, Suman VJ, Mittendorf EA. et al; Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology. Sentinel lymph node surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with node-positive breast cancer: the ACOSOG Z1071 (Alliance) clinical trial. JAMA 2013; 310 (14) 1455-1461
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Szuba A, Shin WS, Strauss HW, Rockson S. The third circulation: radionuclide lymphoscintigraphy in the evaluation of lymphedema. J Nucl Med 2003; 44 (01) 43-57
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Kim SH, Kim SC, Choi BI, Han MC. Uterine cervical carcinoma: evaluation of pelvic lymph node metastasis with MR imaging. Radiology 1994; 190 (03) 807-811
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Giammarile F, Vidal-Sicart S, Paez D. et al. Sentinel lymph node methods in breast cancer. Semin Nucl Med 2022; 52 (05) 551-560
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Rodriguez-Molares A, Rindal OMH, D'hooge J. et al. The generalized contrast-to-noise ratio: a formal definition for lesion detectability. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 2020; 67 (04) 745-759
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Lanfranchi F, Arnaldi D, Miceli A. et al. Different z-score cut-offs for striatal binding ratio (SBR) of DaT SPECT are needed to support the diagnosis of Parkinson's disease (PD) and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB). Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2023; 50 (04) 1090-1102
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Okuda K, Nakajima K, Yamada M. et al. Optimization of iterative reconstruction parameters with attenuation correction, scatter correction and resolution recovery in myocardial perfusion SPECT/CT. Ann Nucl Med 2014; 28 (01) 60-68
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Kogler AK, Polemi AM, Nair S. et al. Evaluation of camera-based freehand SPECT in preoperative sentinel lymph node mapping for melanoma patients. EJNMMI Res 2020; 10 (01) 139
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Vermeeren L, Valdés Olmos RA, Meinhardt W. et al. Value of SPECT/CT for detection and anatomic localization of sentinel lymph nodes before laparoscopic sentinel node lymphadenectomy in prostate carcinoma. J Nucl Med 2009; 50 (06) 865-870
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Coffey JP, Hill JC. Breast sentinel node imaging with low-dose SPECT/CT. Nucl Med Commun 2010; 31 (02) 107-111
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Alqahtani MM, Willowson KP, Constable C, Fulton R, Kench PL. Optimization of 99m Tc whole-body SPECT/CT image quality: a phantom study. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2022; 23 (04) e13528
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Patton JA, Turkington TG. SPECT/CT physical principles and attenuation correction. J Nucl Med Technol 2008; 36 (01) 1-10
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Xiang H, Lim H, Fessler JA, Dewaraja YK. A deep neural network for fast and accurate scatter estimation in quantitative SPECT/CT under challenging scatter conditions. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2020; 47 (13) 2956-2967
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Hulme KW, Kappadath SC. Implications of CT noise and artifacts for quantitative 99mTc SPECT/CT imaging. Med Phys 2014; 41 (04) 042502
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Vosoughi H, Emami F, Momennezhad M, Geramifar P, Rahmim A. Standardization and optimization of Siemens Biograph TruePoint PET/CT acquisition and reconstruction parameters: Simultaneous qualitative and quantitative assessments. . Iran J Nucl Med 2024
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Vosoughi H, Hajizadeh M, Emami F, Momennezhad M, Geramifar P. PET NEMA IQ Phantom dataset: image reconstruction settings for quantitative PET imaging. Data Brief 2021; 37: 107231
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Dieckens D, Lavalaye J, Romijn L, Habraken J. Contrast-noise-ratio (CNR) analysis and optimisation of breast-specific gamma imaging (BSGI) acquisition protocols. EJNMMI Res 2013; 3 (01) 21
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Ismail FS, Mansor S. Impact of resolution recovery in quantitative 99mTc SPECT/CT cardiac phantom studies. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci 2019; 50 (03) 449-453
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Wang M, Dong S, Zhang R. et al. Impact of reconstruction parameters on spatial resolution and its comparison between cadmium-zinc-telluride SPECT/CT and conventional SPECT/CT. Nucl Med Commun 2022; 43 (01) 8-16
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Salkica N, Begic A, Zubovic S. et al. Impact of reduced acquisition time on bone single-photon emission computed tomography images in oncology patients. Acta Inform Med 2022; 30 (01) 36-40
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Miyaji N, Miwa K, Tokiwa A. et al. Phantom and clinical evaluation of bone SPECT/CT image reconstruction with xSPECT algorithm. EJNMMI Res 2020; 10 (01) 71
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Goenka AH, Herts BR, Dong F. et al. Image noise, CNR, and detectability of low-contrast, low-attenuation liver lesions in a phantom: effects of radiation exposure, phantom size, integrated circuit detector, and iterative reconstruction. Radiology 2016; 280 (02) 475-482
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Işikci NI. Comparison between planar, SPECT and SPECT/computed tomography systems in 99mTc- nanocolloid sentinel lymph node imaging: phantom design and clinical investigations. Nucl Med Commun 2019; 40 (08) 786-791
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Fukami M, Matsutomo N, Yamamoto T. Optimization of number of iterations as a reconstruction parameter in bone SPECT imaging using a novel thoracic spine phantom. J Nucl Med Technol 2021; 49 (02) 143-149
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Lyra M, Ploussi A. Filtering in SPECT image reconstruction. Int J Biomed Imaging 2011; 2011: 693795
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Vosoughi H, Momennezhad M, Emami F, Hajizadeh M, Rahmim A, Geramifar P. Multicenter quantitative 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography performance harmonization: use of hottest voxels towards more robust quantification. Quant Imaging Med Surg 2023; 13 (04) 2218-2233
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Aide N, Lasnon C, Veit-Haibach P, Sera T, Sattler B, Boellaard R. EANM/EARL harmonization strategies in PET quantification: from daily practice to multicentre oncological studies. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2017; 44 (Suppl. 01) 17-31
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar