PDF herunterladen
Semin Thromb Hemost 2000; 26(6): 657-668
DOI: 10.1055/s-2000-13222
Copyright © 2000 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA. Tel.: +1(212) 584-4662

Strategies for the Safe and Effective Exclusion and Diagnosis of Deep Vein Thrombosis by the Sequential Use of Clinical Score, D-Dimer Testing, and Compression Ultrasonography

Jan Jacques Michiels1 , Geneviéve Freyburger2 , Fedde Van Der Graaf3 , Mirian Janssen4 , Wija Oortwijn5 , Edwin J. R. Van Beek6
  • 1Clinical Hemostasis and Thrombosis, Department of Hematology, University Hospital Antwerp and the Goodheart Institute Center for Hemostasis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Pathology, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
  • 2Laboratoire d'Hématologie, Hôpital Pellegrin, Bordeaux, France
  • 3Clinical Laboratories, Sint Joseph Hospital Veldhoven, The Netherlands
  • 4Department of Internal Medicine, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital Nijmegen, The Netherlands
  • 5TNO, Prevention and Health, Leiden, The Netherlands
  • 6Division of Clinical Sciences, Academic Radiology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital Sheffield, United Kingdom
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
31. Dezember 2000 (online)

    Lizenzen und Reprints

ABSTRACT

Patients with suspected deep vein thrombosis (DVT) are subjected to leg vein compression ultrasonography (CUS) that confirms DVT in only 20 to 30% of patients. A positive CUS is consistent with DVT irrespective of clinical score. The sequential use of a simple clinical score assessment, a rapid sensitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) D-dimer test and CUS to safely exclude DVT is promising. The clinical score is a validated clinical model of complaints, signs, and symptoms, on the basis of which a pretest clinical probability for DVT can be estimated as low, moderate, and high. The safe exclusion of DVT by a rapid sensitive D-dimer test in combination with clinical score or CUS necessitates a negative predictive value of more than 99%. The negative predictive value for DVT is determined by the sensitivity of the rapid ELISA D-dimer test and the prevalence of DVT in subgroups of outpatients with suspected DVT. The prevalence of DVT in outpatients with a low, moderate, and high clinical score varies widely from 3 to 10%, 15 to 30% and more than 70%, respectively. A negative rapid ELISA D-dimer and a low clinical score (prevalence DVT 3 to 5%) will have a very high negative predictive value of more than 99.5% to exclude DVT without the need of CUS testing. A negative ELISA D-dimer test and a first-negative CUS safely exclude DVT in patients with a moderate clinical score with a negative predictive value of more than 99.5%, therefore obviating the need to repeat CUS. The use of a rapid ELISA D-dimer testing in patients with a high clinical score is not recommended. A negative CUS, a low clinical score, and a positive ELISA D-dimer, even less than 1000 ng/mL exclude DVT with a negative predictive value of more than 99%. Patients with a negative CUS, but a positive ELISA D-dimer, and a moderate or high clinical score have a probability of DVT of 3 to 5% and 20 to 30%, respectively, and are thus candidates for repeated CUS testing. The proposed sequential use of the clinical score assessment, a rapid ELISA D-dimer test, and CUS will be the most cost-effective diagnostic strategy for DVT because of a significant reduction of CUS examinations and gain of time for the patient and physician in charge.

KEYWORD

Deep vein thrombosis - ELISA D-dimer assay - compression ultrasonography - clinical score - diagnostic management - cost-effectiveness

REFERENCES

  • 1 Anderson F A, Wheeler H B, Goldberg R J. A population-based perspective of the hospital incidence and case-fatality rates of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. The Worchester DVT Study.  Arch Intern Med . 1991;  151 933-938
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 2 Nicolaides A N, Kakkar V V, Field E S, Renney J T. The origin of deep vein thrombosis: a venographic study.  Br J Radiol . 1971;  44 653-663
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 3 Cogo A, Lensing A W, Prandoni P, Hirsh J. Distribution of thrombosis in patients with symptomatic deep vein thrombosis. Implications for simplifying diagnostic process with compression ultrasonography.  Arch Intern Med . 1993;  153 2777-2780
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 4 Alpert J S, Dalen J E. Epidemiology and natural history of venous thromboembolism.  Prog Cardiovasc Dis . 1994;  36 417-422
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 5 Lagerstedt C I, Olsson C-G, Fagher B O, Oqvist B W. Need for long-term anticoagulant treatment in symptomatic calf-vein thrombosis.  Lancet . 1985;  II 515-518
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 6 Gottlieb R H, Widjaja J, Mehra S, Robinette W B. Clinically important pulmonary emboli: does calf vein US alter outcomes?.  Radiology . 1999;  211 25-29
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 7 Michiels J J. Rational diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis (RADIA DVT) in symptomatic outpatients with suspected DVT: simplification and improvement of decision rule analysis for the exclusion and diagnosis of DVT by the combined use of a simple clinical model, a rapid ELISA D-dimer test and compression ultrasonography (CUS).  Semin Thromb Hemost . 1998;  24 401-407
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 8 Rabinov K, Paulin S. Roentgen diagnosis of venous thrombosis in the leg.  Arch Surg . 1970;  57 726-728
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 9 Thomas M L. Phlebography.  Arch Surg . 1972;  104 145-151
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 10 Cronan J J, Dorfman G S, Scola F H. Deep venous thrombosis: US assessment using vein compressibility.  Radiology . 1987;  162 191
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 11 Monreal M, Monserrat E, Salvador R. Real-time ultrasound for diagnosis of symptomatic venous thrombosis and for screening of patients at risk.  Angiology . 1989;  40 527
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 12 Hull R, Hirsch J, Sackett D. Clinical validity of a negative venogram in patients with clinically suspected venous thrombosis.  Circulation . 1981;  64 622-625
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 13 Cogo A, Lensing A W, Prandoni P. Comparison of real-time B-mode ultrasonography and Doppler ultrasound with contrast venography in the diagnosis of venous thrombosis in symptomatic outpatients.  Thromb Haemost . 1993;  70 404-407
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 14 Kraayenhagen R A, Lensing A WA, Wallis J W. Diagnostic management of venous thromboembolism.  Ballière's Clin Haematol . 1998;  11 541-586
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 15 Kearon C, Julian J A, Math M, Newman T E, Ginsberg J S. Noninvasive diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis.  Ann Intern Med . 1998;  128 663-677
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 16 Fraser J D, Anderson D R. Deep vein thrombosis: recent advances and optimal investigation with CUS.  Radiology . 1999;  211 9-24
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 17 Cronan J J, Dorfman G S, Grusmark J. Lower-extremity deep vein thrombosis: Further experience with and refinements of US assessment.  Radiology . 1988;  168 101-107
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 18 Vaccaro J P, Cronan J J, Dorfman G S. Outcome analysis of patients with normal compression US examinations.  Radiology . 1990;  175 645-649
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 19 Michiels J J, Oortwijn W A, Naaborg R. Exclusion and diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis by a rapid ELISA D-dimer test, compression ultrasonography and a simple clinical model.  Clin Appl Thromb Hemost . 1999;  5 171-180
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 20 Vogel P, Laing F C, Jeffrey R B. Deep venous thrombosis of the lower extremity: US evaluation.  Radiology . 1987;  163 747-751
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 21 Appelman P T, de Jong E T, Lampmann L E. Deep venous thrombosis of the leg: US findings.  Radiology . 1987;  163 743-746
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 22 Lensing A W, Prandoni P, Brandjes D. Detection of deep-vein thrombosis by real-time B-mode ultrasonography.  N Engl J Med . 1989;  320 342-345
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 23 Cogo A, Lensing A WA, Prandoni P, Hirsch J. Distribution of thrombosis in patients with symptomatic deep vein thrombosis.  Arch Intern Med . 1993;  153 2777-2780
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 24 Wells P, Hirsh J, Lensing A W. Accuracy of clinical assessment of deep-vein thrombosis.  Lancet . 1995;  I 1326-1330
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 25 Cogo A, Lensing A W, Koopman M MW. Compression ultrasonography with clinically suspected deep vein thrombosis: prospective cohort study.  Br Med J . 1998;  316 17-20
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 26 Birdwell B G, Raskob G E, Whitsett T L. The clinical validity of normal compression ultrasonography in outpatients suspected of having deep venous thrombosis.  Ann Intern Med . 1998;  128 1-7
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 27 Bounameaux H, Perrier A. Repeat CUS testing is unjustified.  Br Med J . 1998;  316 1534-5135
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 28 Alexander R H, Col L T, Folse R. Thrombophlebitis and thromboembolism.  Ann Surg . 1974;  180 883-887
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 29 Richards K L, Armstrong J D, Tokoff G. Noninvasive diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis.  Arch Intern Med . 1976;  136 1091-1096
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 30 Landefeld C S, McGuire E, Cohen C. Clinical findings associated with acute proximal deep vein thrombosis: A basis for quantifying clinical judgement.  Am J Med . 1990;  88 382-388
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 31 Wells P, Anderson D R, Bormanis J. Value of assessment of pretest probability of deep-vein thrombosis in clinical management.  Lancet . 1997;  350 1795-1798
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 32 Miron M-J, Perrier A, Bounameaux H. Clinical probability of deep vein thrombosis: comparison between a score and an empirical assessment.  J Intern Med . 1999 in press; 
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 33 Kraaijenhagen R A, Teijgeler H M, Koopman M MW, Büller H R. A comparison between two clinical pretest probability models for patients with signs and symptoms of deep vein thrombosis (abstract).  Thromb Haemostas . 1999;  Suppl 545
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 34 Janssen M CH, Wollersheim H, Verbruggen H, Novakova R O. Rapid D-dimer assays to exclude deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: Current status and new developments.  Sem Thromb Hemost . 1998;  23 393-400
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 35 Lee A YY, Ginsberg J S. Laboratory diagnosis of venous thromboembolism.  Baillière's Clin Haematol . 1998;  11 587-604
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 36 Dempfle C E. Use of D-dimer assays in the diagnosis of venous thrombosis.  Semin Thromb Hemost . 2000;  26 631-641
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 37 Wells P S, Brill-Edwards P, Stevens P. A novel and rapid whole-blood assay for D-dimer in patients with clinically suspected deep vein thrombosis.  Circulation . 1995;  91 2184-2187
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 38 Janssen M CH, Heebels A E, de Metz M. Reliability of five rapid D-dimer assays compared to ELISA in the exclusion of deep venous thrombosis.  Thromb Haemost . 1997;  77 262-266
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 39 Freyburger G, Trillaud H, Labrouche S. D-dimer strategy in thrombosis exclusion. A gold standard study in 100 patients suspected of deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism: 8 DD methods compared.  Thromb Haemost . 1998;  79 31-37
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 40 Van der Graaf F, van den Borne H, van der Kolk M. Exclusion of deep venous thrombosis with D-dimer testing.  Thromb Haemost . 2000;  83 191-198
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 41 Pittet J-L, de Moerloose P, Reber G. VIDAS Didimer: Fast quantitative ELISA for measuring D-dimer in plasma.  Clin Chem . 1996;  42 410-415
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 42 Vukovich T C, Hamwi A, Bieglmeyer C. D-dimer testing within the routine clinical chemistry profile.  Clin Chem . 1998;  44 1557-1558
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 43 De Maat P M M, Meijer P, Nieuwenhuizen W. Performance of semi-quantitative and quantitative D-dimer assays in the ECAT External Quality Assessment Programme.  Semin Thromb Hemostas . 2000;  26 625-630
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 44 Bernardi E, Prandoni P, Lensing A W, et a l, on behalf of the MIDUS Investigators Group. Simplified compression ultrasonography for the diagnostic management of patients with clinically suspected venous thrombosis.  BMJ . 1998;  317 1037-1040
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 45 Kraaijenhagen R A, Koopman M MW, Piovelli F. Simplification of the diagnostic management of outpatients with symptomatic deep vein thrombosis with D-dimer measurements (abstract).  Thromb Haemost . 1999;  (suppl 175) 547
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 46 Sadouk M'B, Desmarrais S, Patenaude J-V, Lepage R. Comparison of diagnostic performance of three new fast D-dimer assays in the exclusion of deep vein thrombosis.  Clin Chem . 2000;  46 286-287
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 47 D'Angelo A, D'Alessandro G, Tomassini L. Evaluation of a new rapid quantitative D-dimer assay in patients with clinically suspected deep vein thrombosis.  Thromb Haemost . 1996;  75 412-416
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 48 Elias A, Aptel I, Huc B. D-dimer test and diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis: A comparative study of 7 assays.  Thromb Haemost . 1996;  76 518-522
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 49 Borg J Y, Lévesque H, Cailleux N. Rapid quantitative D-dimer assay and clinical evaluation for the diagnosis of clinically suspected deep vein thrombosis.  Thromb Haemost . 1997;  77 602-603
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 50 Legnani C, Pancani C, Palareti G. Comparison of new rapid methods for D-dimer measurement to exclude deep vein thrombosis in symptomatic outpatients.  Blood Coag Fibrinolysis . 1999;  8 296-302
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 51 Perrier A, Desmarais S, Miron M J. Non-invasive diagnosis of venous thromboembolism in outpatients.  Lancet . 1999;  353 190-195
    Suche in Google Scholar