Download PDF
Radiologie up2date 2007; 7(1): 9-27
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-966112
Abdominelle und gastrointestinale Radiologie

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Bildgebendes Staging von Tumoren des Verdauungstrakts

Imaging staging of gastrointestinal tumorsA.  J.  Beer, H.  A.  Wieder, J. Chr.  Stollfuss
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
28 February 2007 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints All articles of this category

Zusammenfassung

Im folgenden Artikel werden die klinischen und technischen Grundlagen für das Staging von Tumoren des Verdauungstrakts erörtert. Die wichtigsten Indikationen sowie Stärken und Schwächen der einzelnen bildgebenden Verfahren werden diskutiert. Dabei wird auch auf zukünftige Anwendungsmöglichkeiten innovativer bildgebender Techniken im Rahmen des Primärstagings und auch zur Beurteilung des Therapieerfolgs eingegangen, z. B. die PET und die MRT.

Abstract

In this article, the clinical and technical background for staging of gastrointestinal tumors will be discussed. The indications of the different imaging modalities as well as their strengths and weaknesses will be explained. One focus will also be on the perspectives of innovative techniques for primary staging of gastrointestinal tumors and response evaluation during therapy, like PET and MRI.

Key words

Staging - imaging modalities - PET - MRI

Literatur

  • 1 Rösch T. Endosonographic staging of esophageal carcinoma: a review of literature results.  Gastrointest Endos Clin N Am. 1995;  5 549-557
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Waymann J, Chaktraverty S, Griffin S M, Doyle G J, Keir M J, Simpson W. Evaluation of local invasion by esophageal carcinoma - prospective study of prone computed tomography scanning.  Postgrad Med J. 2001;  177 181-184
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Picus D, Balfe D M, Koehler R E, Roper C L, Owen J W. Computed tomography in the staging of esophageal carcinoma.  Radiology. 1983;  146 433-438
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Thompson W M, Halvorsen R A, Foster jr  W L . et al . Computed tomography for staging esophageal and gastroesophageal cancer: reevaluation.  Am J Roentgenol. 1983;  141 951-958
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Flanagan F L, Dehdashti F, Siegel B A, Trask D D, Sundaresan S R, Patterson G A, Cooper J D. Staging of esophageal cancer with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography.  Am J Roentgenol. 1997;  168 417-424
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Whyte R I. Advances in the staging of intrathoracic malignancies.  World J Surg. 2001;  25 167-173
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Weber W A, Ott K, Becker K, Dittler H J . et al . Prediction of response to preoperative chemotherapy in adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction by metabolic imaging.  J Clin Oncol. 2001;  19 3058-3065
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Wieder H A, Bruecher B LDM, Zimmermann F . et al . Time course of tumor metabolic activity during chemoradiotherapy of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and response to treatment.  J Clin Oncol. 2004;  22 900-908
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Dittler H J, Siewert J R. Role of endoscopic ultrasonography in gastric carcinoma.  Endoscopy. 1993;  25 162-166
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Murata Y, Suzuki S, Hashimoto H. Endoscopic ultrasonography of the upper gastrointestinal tract.  Surg Endosc. 1988;  2 180-183
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Tunaci M. Carcinoma of stomach and duodenum: radiologic diagnosis and staging.  Eur J Radiol. 2002;  42 181-192
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Botet J F, Lightdale C J, Zauber A G. Preoperative staging of gastric cancer. Comparison of endoscopic US and dynamic CT.  Radiology. 1991;  181 426-432
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Grimm H, Hamper K, Binmoller K F . et al . Enlarged lymph nodes: malignant or not?.  Endoscopy. 1992;  24[Suppl 1] 320-323
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Evans E, Harris O, Dickey D . et al . Difficulties in the endoscopic diagnosis of gastric and oesophageal cancer.  Aust NZ J Surg. 1985;  55 541-544
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Low V HS, Levine M S, Rubesin S E . et al . Diagnosis of gastric carcinoma: sensitivity of double-contrast barium studies.  Am J Roentgenol. 1994;  162 329-334
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Lee J H, Jeong Y K, Kim D H . et al . Two-phase halical CT for detection of early gastric carcinoma: importance of the mucosal phase for analysis of the abnormal mucosal layer.  J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2000;  24 777-782
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Dux M, Richter G M, Hansmann J, Kuntz C, Kauffmann G W. Helical hydro-CT for diagnosis and staging of gastric carcinoma.  J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1999;  23 913-922
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Stell D A, Carter C R, Stewart I . et al . Prospective comparison of laparoscopy, ultrasongraphy and computed tomography in staging of gastric cancer.  Br J Surg. 996;  83 1260-1262
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Cho J S, Kim J K, Rho S M . et al . Preoperative assessment of gastric carcinoma: value of two-phase dynamic CT with mechanical iv injection of contrast material.  Am J Roentgenol. 1994;  163 69-75
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Minami M, Kawauchi N, Itai Y . et al . Gastric tumors: radiologicpathologic correlation and accuracy of T staging with dynamic CT.  Radiology. 1992;  185 173-178
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Kim A Y, Han J K, Seong C K . et al . MRI in staging advanced gastric cancer: is it useful compared with spiral CT?.  J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2000;  24 389-394
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Shon K M, Lee J M, Lee S Y . et al . Comparing MR Imaging and CT in the staging of gastric carcinoma.  Am J Roentgenol. 2000;  174 1551-1557
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Mochiki E, Kuwano H, Katoh H, Asao T, Oriuchi N, Endo K. Evaluation of 18F-2-deoxy-2-fluoro-D-glucose positron emission tomography for gastric cancer.  World J Surg. 2004;  28 247-253
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Chen J, Cheong J H, Yun M J, Kim J, Lim J S, Hyung W J, Noh S H. Improvement in preoperative staging of gastric adenocarcinoma with positron emission tomography.  Cancer. 2005;  103 2383-2390
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Stroobants S, Goeminne J, Seegers M . et al . 18FDG-Positron emission tomography for the early prediction of response in advanced soft tissue sarcoma treated with imatinib mesylate (Glivec).  Eur J Cancer. 2003;  39 2012-2020
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Gayed I, Vu T, Iyer R, Johnson M, Macapinlac H, Swanston N, Podoloff D. The role of 18F-FDG PET in staging and early prediction of response to therapy of recurrent gastrointestinal stromal tumors.  J Nucl Med. 2004;  45 17-21. Erratum in: J Nucl Med 2004; 45 : 1803
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Astler V B, Coller F A. The prognostic significance of direct extension of carcinoma of the colon and rectum.  Ann Surg. 1954;  139 846
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Glaser F, Schlag P, Herfarth C. Endorectal ultrasonography for the assessment of invasion of rectal tumours and lymph node involvement.  Br J Surg. 1990;  77 883-887
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Thoeni R F. Colorectal cancer: cross-sectional imaging for staging of primary tumor and detection of local recurrence.  Am J Roentgenol. 1991;  156 909-915
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Hundt W, Braunschweig R, Reiser M. Evaluation of spiral CT in staging of colon and rectum carcinoma.  Eur Radiol. 1999;  9 78-84
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Kwok H, Bissett I P, Hill G L. Preoperative staging of rectal cancer.  Int J Colorectal Dis. 2000;  15 9-20
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Beets-Tan R G, Beets G L. Rectal cancer: how accurate can imaging predict the T stage and the circumferential resection margin?.  Int J Colorectal Dis. 2003;  18 385-391
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 Vliegen R F, Beets G L, von Meyenfeldt M F . et al . Rectal Cancer: MR Imaging in Local Staging - Is Gadolinium-based Contrast Material Helpful?.  Radiology. 2005;  234 179-188
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 34 Chessin D B, Kiran R P, Akhurst T, Guillem J G. The emerging role of 18F-Fluorodesoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography in the Management of Primary and Recurrent Rectal Cancer.  J Am Coll Surg. 2005;  201 948-956
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar

Dr. med. Ambros J. Beer

Technische Universität München, Institut für Röntgendiagnostik, Klinikum rechts der Isar

Ismaninger Str. 22

81675 München

Phone: 089 4140 2621

Fax: 089 4140 4834

Email: beer@roe.med.tum.de