PDF herunterladen
CC BY 4.0 · Aorta (Stamford) 2014; 02(06): 279-285
DOI: 10.12945/j.aorta.2014.14-054
State-of-the-Art Review
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Update on New Tools for Three-dimensional Navigation in Endovascular Procedures

Jos C. van den Berg
1   Service of Interventional Radiology, Ospedale Regionale di Lugano, Sede Civico, Lugano, Switzerland
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

28. August 2014

08. November 2014

Publikationsdatum:
24. September 2018 (online)

Auch verfügbar auf
   Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Based on a Presentation at the 2013 VEITH Symposium, November 19–23, 2013 (New York, NY, USA)

Three-dimensional (3D) guidance for endovascular procedures has developed over the last decade from 3D rotational angiography to the use of dynamic 3D roadmap techniques. The latest development is image merging. This technique combines real-time feedback of fluoroscopy with optimal soft-tissue contrast of previously performed computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance angiography. Merging of CT angiography and cone-beam CT/fluoroscopic images is feasible, and preliminary results look promising. Merging will allow us to further reduce radiation exposure, contrast dose, and procedural time, and its main use and benefit will be in complex endovascular interventions.

Key Words

3D navigation - Cone-beam computed tomography - Endovascular - Fusion imaging
 

  • References

  • 1 Unno N, Mitsuoka H, Takei Y, Igarashi T, Uchiyama T, Yamamoto N. , et al. Virtual angioscopy using 3-dimensional rotational digital subtraction angiography for endovascular assessment. J Endovasc Ther 2002; 9: 529-34 . 10.1583/1545-1550(2002)009<0529:VAUDRD>2.0.CO;2
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Klucznik RP. Current technology and clinical applications of three-dimensional angiography. Radiol Clin North Am 2002; 40: 711-28 . 10.1016/S0033-8389(02)00023-4
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 van den Berg JC, Overtoom TT, de Valois JC, Moll FL. Using three-dimensional rotational angiography for sizing of covered stents. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002; 178: 149-52
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 van den Berg JC, Moll FL. Three-dimensional rotational angiography in peripheral endovascular interventions. J Endovasc Ther 2003; 10: 595-600 . 10.1583/1545-1550(2003)010<0595:TRAIPE>2.0.CO;2
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 van den Berg JC. Three-dimensional rotational angiography. In: Wyatt MG, Watkinson AF. Endovascular intervention-current controversies. Shrewsbury, United Kingdom: TFM Publishing Limited; 2004. , p. 247-56
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Braak SJ, van Strijen MJ, van LM, van Es HW, van Heesewijk JP. Real-time 3D fluoroscopy guidance during needle interventions: technique, accuracy, and feasibility. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010; 194: W445-51 . 10.2214/AJR.09.3647
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Levitt MR, Ghodke BV, Cooke DL, Hallam DK, Kim LJ, Sekhar LN. Endovascular procedures with CTA and MRA roadmapping. J Neuroimaging 2011; 21: 259-62 . 10.1111/j.1552-6569.2010.00507.x
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Bargellini I, Turini F, Bozzi E, Lauretti D, Cicorelli A, Lunardi A. , et al. Image fusion of preprocedural CTA with real-time fluoroscopy to guide proper hepatic artery catheterization during transarterial chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma: a feasibility study. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2013; 36: 526-30 . 10.1007/s00270-012-0495-9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Gupta A, Grunhagen T. Live MR angiographic roadmapping for uterine artery embolization: a feasibility study. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2013; 24: 1690-7 . 10.1016/j.jvir.2013.07.013
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Kobeiter H, Nahum J, Becquemin JP. Zero-contrast thoracic endovascular aortic repair using image fusion. Circulation 2011; (124) e280-2 . 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.014118
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Carrell TW, Modarai B, Brown JR, Penney GP. Feasibility and limitations of an automated 2D-3D rigid image registration system for complex endovascular aortic procedures. J Endovasc Ther 2010; 17: 527-33 . 10.1583/09-2987MR.1
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Dijkstra ML, Eagleton MJ, Greenberg RK, Mastracci T, Hernandez A. Intraoperative C-arm cone-beam computed tomography in fenestrated/branched aortic endografting. J Vasc Surg 2011; 53: 583-90 . 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.09.039
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Sailer AM, de Haan MW, Peppelenbosch AG, Jacobs MJ, Wildberger JE, Schurink GW. CTA with fluoroscopy image fusion guidance in endovascular complex aortic aneurysm repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2014; 47: 349-56 . 10.1016/j.ejvs.2013.12.022
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Tacher V, Lin M, Desgranges P, Deux JF, Grunhagen T, Becquemin JP. , et al. Image guidance for endovascular repair of complex aortic aneurysms: comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional angiography and image fusion. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2013; 24: 1698-706 . 10.1016/j.jvir.2013.07.016
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Loffroy R, Lin M, Yenokyan G, Rao PP, Bhagat N, Noordhoek N. , et al. Intraprocedural C-arm dual-phase cone-beam CT: can it be used to predict short-term response to TACE with drug-eluting beads in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma?. Radiology 2013; 266: 636-48 . 10.1148/radiol.12112316
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Klein AJ, Tomkowiak MT, Vigen KK, Hacker TA, Speidel MA, Vanlysel MS. , et al. Multimodality image fusion to guide peripheral artery chronic total arterial occlusion recanalization in a swine carotid artery occlusion model: unblinding the interventionalist. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2012; 1; 80: 1090-8 . 10.1002/ccd.24391
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar