Download PDF
Thromb Haemost 2002; 88(03): 402-406
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1613229
Review Article
Schattauer GmbH

The Diagnostic Value of Compression Ultrasonography in Patients with Suspected Recurrent Deep Vein Thrombosis

Paolo Prandoni
1   Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, 2nd Chair of Internal Medicine, University of Padua Medical School, Padua, Italy
,
Anthonie WA Lensing
2   The Center for Vascular Medicine, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
,
Enrico Bernardi
1   Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, 2nd Chair of Internal Medicine, University of Padua Medical School, Padua, Italy
,
Sabina Villalta
1   Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, 2nd Chair of Internal Medicine, University of Padua Medical School, Padua, Italy
,
Paola Bagatella
1   Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, 2nd Chair of Internal Medicine, University of Padua Medical School, Padua, Italy
,
Antonio Girolami
1   Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, 2nd Chair of Internal Medicine, University of Padua Medical School, Padua, Italy
,
for the DERECUS Investigators Group › Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received 23 January 2002

Accepted after resubmission 11 June 2002

Publication Date:
08 December 2017 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Summary

Diagnosis of recurrent deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) is difficult because of limitations in distinguishing acute from old thrombi. In the past, an ultrasound method for diagnosis of recurrent ipsilateral DVT was developed, which relies on repeated measurements of the diameters of the common femoral and popliteal veins. To assess the safety of withholding anticoagulation from patients with improved or stable compression vein diameters, 205 consecutive patients presenting with suspected recurrent ipsilateral DVT were evaluated. The vein diameter was measured under compression with the transducer and compared with earlier ultrasound results. Patients with stable or improved ultrasound findings had repeat ultrasound assessments after 2 (± 1) and 7 (± 1) days. Patients with repeatedly normal ultrasound results were followed-up for six months to determine the incidence of symptomatic recurrent venous thromboembolism.

Of the 205 patients, 153 had stable or improved ultrasound findings. Repeat ultrasound assessment became abnormal in 3, and recurrence was confirmed by venography in all. A six months follow-up was done in the remaining 150 patients with repeatedly normal ultrasound tests and showed 2 (1.3%; 95% CI, 0.02 to 4.7%) confirmed non-fatal venous thromboembolic complications. The positive predictive value of a stable or improved ultrasound was 90% (95% CI, 77 to 97%).

In conclusion, it is safe to withhold anticoagulant treatment from patients with suspected recurrent ipsilateral DVT in whom compression ultrasonography showed improved or stable vein diameters.

Keywords

DVT - thrombi - ultrasonography

* Other participants in the DERECUS Study: Lino Benedetti, Michela Frulla, Antonio Marchiori, Andrea Piccioli, Luigi Scarano, Daniela Tormene


 

  • References

  • 1 Prandoni P, Lensing AWA, Cogo A, Cuppini S, Villalta S, Carta M, Cattelan AM, Polistena P, Bernardi E, Prins MH. The long-term clinical course of acute deep venous thrombosis. Ann Intern Med 1996; 125: 1-7.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Lensing AWA, Prandoni P, Prins HR, Büller HR. Deep-vein thrombosis. Lancet 1999; 353: 479-85.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Hull RD, Carter CJ, Jay RM, Ockelford PA, Hirsh J, Turpie AG, Zielinsky A, Gent M, Powers PJ. The diagnosis of acute recurrent DVT. A diagnostic challenge. Circulation 1983; 67: 901-6.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Leclerc JR, Jay RM, Hull RD, Hirsh J. Recurrent leg symptoms following deep vein thrombosis. A diagnostic challenge. Arch Intern Med 1985; 145: 1867-9.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Huisman MV, Büller HR, ten Cate JW. Utility of impedance plethysmography in the diagnosis of recurrent DVT. Arch Intern Med 1988; 148: 681-3.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Lensing AWA, Prandoni P, Brandjes D, Huisman PM, Vigo M, Tomasella G, Krekt J, ten Cate JW, Huisman MV, Buller HR. Detection of DVT by real-time B-mode ultrasonography. N Engl J Med 1989; 320: 342-5.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Heijboer H, Jongbloets LMM, Büller HR, Lensing AWA, ten Cate JW. Clinical utility of real-time compression ultrasonography for diagnostic management of patients with recurrent venous thrombosis. Acta Radiol 1992; 33: 297-300.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Prandoni P, Cogo A, Bernardi E, Villalta S, Polistena P, Simioni P, Noventa F, Benedetti L, Girolami A. A simple ultrasound approach for detection of recurrent proximal-vein thrombosis. Circulation 1993; 88: 1730-5.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Hirsh J, Hoak J. Management of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. A statement for health care professionals. Circulation 1996; 93: 2212-45.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Koopman MMW, Büller HR, ten Cate JW. Diagnosis of recurrent deep vein thrombosis. Haemostasis 1995; 25: 49-57.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Lagerstedt CJ, Olsson CG, Fagher BO, Oqvist BW, Albrechtsson U. Need for long-term anticoagulant treatment in symptomatic calf-vein thrombosis. Lancet 1985; 02: 515-8.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Lensing AWA, Hirsh J, Ginsberg JS, Buller HR. Diagnosis of venous thrombosis. In Colman RW, Hirsh J, Marder VJ, Clowes AW, George JN. (eds): Hemostasis and Thrombosis. Basic principles and clinical practice. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; Philadelphia: fourth edition. 2000: 1277-302.
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Koopman MMW, Jongbloets LMM, Lensing AWA, Büller HR, ten Cate JW. Clinical utility of a quantitative B-mode ultrasonography method in patients with suspected recurrent deep vein thrombosis. Thromb Haemost 1993; 69 (Suppl): 623a.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Kearon C, Julian JA, Newman TE, Ginsberg JS. Noninvasive diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis. McMaster Diagnostic Imaging Practice Guidelines Initiative. Ann Intern Med 1998; 128: 663-77.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Wells PS, Anderson DR, Bormanis J, Guy F, Mitchell M, Gray L, Clement C, Robinson KS, Lewandowski B. et al. Value of assessment of pretest probability of DVT in clinical management. Lancet 1997; 350: 1795-8.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Bernardi E, Prandoni P, Lensing AWA, Agnelli G, Guazzaloca G, Scannapieco G, Piovella F, Verlato F, Tomasi C, Moia M, Scarano L, Girolami A. D-Dimer testing as an adjunct to ultrasonography in patients with clinically suspected deep vein thrombosis: prospective cohort study. Br Med J 1998; 317: 1037-40.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Perrier A, Desmarais S, Miron MJ, de Moerloose P, Lepage R, Slosman D, Didier D, Unger PF, Patenaude JV, Bounameaux H. Non-invasive diagnosis of venous thromboembolism in outpatients. Lancet 1999; 353: 190-5.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Kraaijenhagen RA, Lensing AWA, Ljimer JG, Prandoni P, Prins MH, Ginsberg JS, Büller HR. Diagnostic strategies for the management of patients with clinically suspected deep-vein thrombosis. Curr Opinion Pulm Med 1997; 03: 268-74.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Fraser JD, Anderson DR. Deep venous thrombosis: recent advances and optimal investigation with US. Radiology 1999; 211: 9-24.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar