Facial Plast Surg 2010; 26(2): 063-068
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1253505
© Thieme Medical Publishers

Race and Ethnicity in Nasal Plastic Surgery: A Need for Science

S.C. Leong1 , Ronald Eccles1
  • 1Common Cold Centre and Healthcare Clinical Trials, Cardiff School of Biosciences, Cardiff University, United Kingdom
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
04 May 2010 (online)

ABSTRACT

Race and ethnicity have no scientific or anthropologic validity, yet nasal plastic surgeons continue to categorize patient demographic variables according to racial and ethnic lines. The aim of this article is to discuss the problems of using race and ethnicity as demographic variables in nasal surgery. It is important to define the population demographics in any surgical study, but race and ethnicity are categories without any scientific basis. The nasal index or other anthropometric objective measures of the external nose may be used as discriminators of variation for studies in rhinology, but more studies are required to define their clinical relevance and usefulness in plastic surgery. The article critically examines the use of racial/ethnic categories and anthropometric measurements in nasal plastic surgery.

REFERENCES

  • 1 Huizing E, deGroot J. Functional Reconstructive Nasal Surgery. Stuttgart, Germany; Thieme 2003
  • 2 Park C H, Kim I W, Hong S M, Lee J H. Revision rhinoplasty of Asian noses: analysis and treatment.  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009;  135 146-155
  • 3 Slupchynskyj O, Gieniusz M. Rhinoplasty for African American patients: a retrospective review of 75 cases.  Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2008;  10 232-236
  • 4 Leong S C, White P S. A comparison of aesthetic proportions between the Oriental and Caucasian nose.  Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 2004;  29 672-676
  • 5 Palma P, Bignami M, Delù G, De Bernardi F, Castelnuovo P. Rhinoplasty for the Mediterranean nose.  Facial Plast Surg. 2003;  19 279-294
  • 6 Forrest C. Obituary. Leslie Farkas.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;  123 1899-1900
  • 7 Spencer S. The Politics of Naming. Race and Ethnicity. Culture, Identity and Representation. New York, NY; Routledge 2006: 31-54
  • 8 Blakemore C. The Oxford Companion to The Body. New York, NY; Oxford University Press 2001
  • 9 Cuvier B. The Animal Kingdom. London, UK; W.H. Allen 1890
  • 10 Freedman B J. For debate…Caucasian.  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1984;  288 696-698
  • 11 Bhopal R, Donaldson L. White, European, Western, Caucasian, or what? Inappropriate labeling in research on race, ethnicity, and health.  Am J Public Health. 1998;  88 1303-1307
  • 12 Fullilove M T. Comment: abandoning “race” as a variable in public health research—an idea whose time has come.  Am J Public Health. 1998;  88 1297-1298
  • 13 Hume D. Essays, Moral Political and Literary. Indianapolis, IN; Liberty Classics 1987
  • 14 Williams R I. The nasal index; anthropological and clinical.  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1956;  65 171-189
  • 15 Thomson A, Dudley Buxton L. Man's nasal index in relation to certain climatic conditions.  The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland. 1923;  53 99-122
  • 16 Davies A. A re-survey of the morphology of the nose in relation to climate.  The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland. 1932;  62 337-359
  • 17 Hinderer K. Fundamentals of Anatomy and Surgery of the Nose. Birmingham, AL; Aesculapius Publishing 1971
  • 18 Ohki M, Naito K, Cole P. Dimensions and resistances of the human nose: racial differences.  Laryngoscope. 1991;  101 276-278
  • 19 Romo III T, Abraham M T. The ethnic nose.  Facial Plast Surg. 2003;  19 269-278
  • 20 Franciscus R G, Long J C. Variation in human nasal height and breadth.  Am J Phys Anthropol. 1991;  85 419-427
  • 21 Yokley T R. Ecogeographic variation in human nasal passages.  Am J Phys Anthropol. 2009;  138 11-22
  • 22 Oladipo G, Eroje M, Fahwehinmi H. Anthropometric comparison of nasal indices between Andoni and Okrika tribes of Rivers State Nigeria.  International Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences. 2009;  1 135-137
  • 23 Leong S C, Eccles R. A systematic review of the nasal index and the significance of the shape and size of the nose in rhinology.  Clin Otolaryngol. 2009;  34 191-198
  • 24 Leong S C, Eccles R. The use of race as a demographic variable in clinical research.  Rhinology. 2010;  48 3-6
  • 25 Farkas L G. Anthropometry of the Head and Face. 2nd ed. New York, NY; Raven Press 1994
  • 26 Farkas L G, Katic M J, Forrest C R et al.. International anthropometric study of facial morphology in various ethnic groups/races.  J Craniofac Surg. 2005;  16 615-646
  • 27 Farkas L G, Hreczko T A, Deutsch C K. Objective assessment of standard nostril types—a morphometric study.  Ann Plast Surg. 1983;  11 381-389
  • 28 El-Hakim H, Crysdale W S, Abdollel M, Farkas L G. A study of anthropometric measures before and after external septoplasty in children: a preliminary study.  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001;  127 1362-1366
  • 29 Anomalies-unlimited.com .A photographic history of Michael Jackson's faceAvailable at: http://www.anomalies-unlimited.com/Jackson.html Accessed November 25, 2009
  • 30 Edler R J. Background considerations to facial aesthetics.  J Orthod. 2001;  28 159-168
  • 31 Wang D, Qian G, Zhang M, Farkas L G. Differences in horizontal, neoclassical facial canons in Chinese (Han) and North American Caucasian populations.  Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1997;  21 265-269

Ronald EcclesPh.D. 

Common Cold Centre and Healthcare Clinical Trials, Cardiff School of Biosciences, Cardiff University

Cardiff CF10 3AX, United Kingdom

Email: eccles@cardiff.ac.uk

    >