J Wrist Surg 2019; 08(01): 066-071
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1675791
Scientific Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Comparison of Direct Surgical Costs for Proximal Row Carpectomy and Four-Corner Arthrodesis

Nikolas H. Kazmers
1   Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
,
Andrew R. Stephens
2   School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
,
Angela P. Presson
3   Division of Public Health, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
4   Department of Pediatric Research Enterprise, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
,
Yizhe Xu
3   Division of Public Health, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
4   Department of Pediatric Research Enterprise, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
,
Ross J. Feller
1   Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
,
Andrew R. Tyser
1   Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
› Author Affiliations
Funding One or more of the authors (A.P.P.) has received funding from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) in the form of a grant—this investigation was supported by the University of Utah Study Design and Biostatistics Center, with funding in part from the National Center for Research Resources and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, NIH, through Grant 5UL1TR001067–02 (formerly 8UL1TR000105 and UL1RR025764).
Further Information

Publication History

15 March 2018

24 September 2018

Publication Date:
16 November 2018 (online)

Abstract

Background Proximal row carpectomy (PRC) and four-corner arthrodesis (FCA) are common treatments for stage II scapholunate advanced collapse (SLAC) and scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse (SNAC) wrists, with similar functional and patient-reported outcomes reported in the peer-reviewed literature.

Questions Study questions included (1) whether surgical encounter total direct costs (SETDCs) differ between PRC and FCA, and (2) whether SETDC differs by method of fixation for FCA.

Patients and Methods Consecutive adult patients (≥ 18 years) undergoing PRC and FCA between July 2011 and May 2017 at a single tertiary care academic institution were identified. Patients undergoing additional simultaneous procedures were excluded. Using our institution's information technology value tools, we extracted prospectively collected cost data for each surgical encounter. SETDCs were compared between PRC and FCA, and between FCA subgroups (screws, plating, or staples).

Results Of 42 included patients, mean age was similar between the 23 PRC and 19 FCA patients (51.2 vs. 54.5 years, respectively). SETDCs were significantly greater for FCA than PRC by 425%. FCA involved significantly greater facility costs (2.3-fold), supply costs (10-fold), and operative time (121 vs. 57 minutes). Implant costs were absent for PRC, which were responsible for 55% of the SETDC for FCA. Compared with compression screws, plating and staple fixation were significantly more costly (70% and 240% greater, respectively).

Conclusion SETDCs were 425% greater for FCA than PRC. Implant costs for FCA alone were 130% greater than the entire surgical encounter for PRC. For FCA, SETDC varied depending on the method of fixation.

Level of Evidence This is a level III, cost analysis study.

Ethical Approval

This study was approved by our university's Institutional Review Board.


 
  • References

  • 1 Lee VS, Kawamoto K, Hess R. , et al. Implementation of a value-driven outcomes program to identify high variability in clinical costs and outcomes and association with reduced cost and improved quality. JAMA 2016; 316 (10) 1061-1072
  • 2 Kawamoto K, Martin CJ, Williams K. , et al. Value Driven Outcomes (VDO): a pragmatic, modular, and extensible software framework for understanding and improving health care costs and outcomes. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2015; 22 (01) 223-235
  • 3 Watson HK, Ballet FL. The SLAC wrist: scapholunate advanced collapse pattern of degenerative arthritis. J Hand Surg Am 1984; 9 (03) 358-365
  • 4 Harrington RH, Lichtman DM, Brockmole DM. Common pathways of degenerative arthritis of the wrist. Hand Clin 1987; 3 (04) 507-527
  • 5 Saltzman BM, Frank JM, Slikker W, Fernandez JJ, Cohen MS, Wysocki RW. Clinical outcomes of proximal row carpectomy versus four-corner arthrodesis for post-traumatic wrist arthropathy: a systematic review. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2015; 40 (05) 450-457
  • 6 Mulford JS, Ceulemans LJ, Nam D, Axelrod TS. Proximal row carpectomy vs four corner fusion for scapholunate (SLAC) or scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse (SNAC) wrists: a systematic review of outcomes. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2009; 34 (02) 256-263
  • 7 Cohen MS, Kozin SH. Degenerative arthritis of the wrist: proximal row carpectomy versus scaphoid excision and four-corner arthrodesis. J Hand Surg Am 2001; 26 (01) 94-104
  • 8 Dacho AK, Baumeister S, Germann G, Sauerbier M. Comparison of proximal row carpectomy and midcarpal arthrodesis for the treatment of scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse (SNAC-wrist) and scapholunate advanced collapse (SLAC-wrist) in stage II. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2008; 61 (10) 1210-1218
  • 9 DiDonna ML, Kiefhaber TR, Stern PJ. Proximal row carpectomy: study with a minimum of ten years of follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004; 86-A (11) 2359-2365
  • 10 Jebson PJ, Hayes EP, Engber WD. Proximal row carpectomy: a minimum 10-year follow-up study. J Hand Surg Am 2003; 28 (04) 561-569
  • 11 Kendall CB, Brown TR, Millon SJ, Rudisill Jr LE, Sanders JL, Tanner SL. Results of four-corner arthrodesis using dorsal circular plate fixation. J Hand Surg Am 2005; 30 (05) 903-907
  • 12 Traverso P, Wong A, Wollstein R, Carlson L, Ashmead D, Watson HK. Ten-year minimum follow-up of 4-corner fusion for SLAC and SNAC wrist. Hand (NY) 2017; 12 (06) 568-572
  • 13 Vanhove W, De Vil J, Van Seymortier P, Boone B, Verdonk R. Proximal row carpectomy versus four-corner arthrodesis as a treatment for SLAC (scapholunate advanced collapse) wrist. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2008; 33 (02) 118-125
  • 14 Bain GI, Watts AC. The outcome of scaphoid excision and four-corner arthrodesis for advanced carpal collapse at a minimum of ten years. J Hand Surg Am 2010; 35 (05) 719-725
  • 15 Aita MA, Nakano EK, Schaffhausser HL, Fukushima WY, Fujiki EN. Randomized clinical trial between proximal row carpectomy and the four-corner fusion for patients with stage II SNAC. Rev Bras Ortop 2016; 51 (05) 574-582
  • 16 Chim H, Moran SL. Long-term outcomes of proximal row carpectomy: a systematic review of the literature. J Wrist Surg 2012; 1 (02) 141-148
  • 17 Wagner ER, Bravo D, Elhassan B, Moran SL. Factors associated with improved outcomes following proximal row carpectomy: a long-term outcome study of 144 patients. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2016; 41 (05) 484-491
  • 18 Wagner ER, Werthel JD, Elhassan BT, Moran SL. Proximal row carpectomy and 4-corner arthrodesis in patients younger than age 45 years. J Hand Surg Am 2017; 42 (06) 428-435
  • 19 Berkhout MJ, Bachour Y, Zheng KH, Mullender MG, Strackee SD, Ritt MJ. Four-corner arthrodesis versus proximal row carpectomy: A retrospective study with a mean follow-up of 17 years. J Hand Surg Am 2015; 40 (07) 1349-1354
  • 20 Richou J, Chuinard C, Moineau G, Hanouz N, Hu W, Le Nen D. Proximal row carpectomy: long-term results. Chir Main 2010; 29 (01) 10-15
  • 21 Ferreres A, Garcia-Elias M, Plaza R. Long-term results of lunocapitate arthrodesis with scaphoid excision for SLAC and SNAC wrists. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2009; 34 (05) 603-608
  • 22 Williams JB, Weiner H, Tyser AR. Long-term outcome and secondary operations after proximal row carpectomy or four-corner arthrodesis. J Wrist Surg 2018; 7 (01) 51-56
  • 23 Wall LB, Didonna ML, Kiefhaber TR, Stern PJ. Proximal row carpectomy: minimum 20-year follow-up. J Hand Surg Am 2013; 38 (08) 1498-1504
  • 24 Rahgozar P, Zhong L, Chung KC. A comparative analysis of resource utilization between proximal row carpectomy and partial wrist fusion: a population study. J Hand Surg Am 2017; 42 (10) 773-780
  • 25 Chalmers PN, Granger E, Nelson R, Yoo M, Tashjian RZ. Factors affecting cost, outcomes, and tendon healing after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy 2018; 34 (05) 1393-1400
  • 26 Tashjian RZ, Belisle J, Baran S. , et al. Factors influencing direct clinical costs of outpatient arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgery. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2018; 27 (02) 237-241
  • 27 Delattre O, Goulon G, Vogels J, Wavreille G, Lasnier A. Three-corner arthrodesis with scaphoid and triquetrum excision for wrist arthritis. J Hand Surg Am 2015; 40 (11) 2176-2182
  • 28 Graham B, Detsky AS. The application of decision analysis to the surgical treatment of early osteoarthritis of the wrist. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2001; 83 (05) 650-654
  • 29 Truven. MarketScan research databases; 2017 . Available at: https://truvenhealth.com/your-healthcare-focus/analytic-research/marketscan-research-databases . Accessed December 12, 2017
  • 30 Peterson C, Xu L, Florence C. , et al. The medical cost of abusive head trauma in the United States. Pediatrics 2014; 134 (01) 91-99
  • 31 Kwon BC, Choi SJ, Shin J, Baek GH. Proximal row carpectomy with capsular interposition arthroplasty for advanced arthritis of the wrist. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009; 91 (12) 1601-1606
  • 32 Tang P, Wei DH, Ueba H, Gardner TR, Rosenwasser MP. Scaphoid excision and 4-bone arthrodesis versus proximal row carpectomy: a comparison of contact biomechanics. J Hand Surg Am 2012; 37 (09) 1861-1867