Outcomes in Patients with a Calipered Kinematically Aligned TKA That Already Had a Contralateral Mechanically Aligned TKA

Abstract

Prior studies suggest kinematically aligned (KA) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) provides some clinical benefits. There are no reports of self-reported outcome measures in patients treated with a calipered KA TKA that already had a contralateral mechanically aligned (MA) TKA. We performed a retrospective study and asked the following questions: (1) Were you satisfied with your MA TKA when you were treated with the KA TKA? (2) What are the Forgotten Joint Scores (FJS) and Oxford Knee Scores (OKS) in each of your knees? (3) Do you favor one knee? and (4) Did one knee recover faster? From January 2013 to January 2017, 2,378 consecutive primary TKAs were performed of which all were treated with calipered KA that uses serial verification checks incorporating measurements of bone resections and positions to restore the prearthritic or native joint lines accurately. A records review identified patients with a prior primary MA TKA in the contralateral limb. Excluded were those with a history of fracture, osteotomy, infection, or revision knee surgery in either limb. In September 2018, 78 patients (57 females) with a mean age of 73 years (range, 50–91 years) completed a follow-up evaluation consisting of the FJS and OKS questionnaires and three anchor questions. A total of 83% of patients were satisfied with the MA TKA and 92% were satisfied with the KA TKA. The KA TKA had a 15 point higher median FJS and a comparable OKS to that of the MA TKA. Also, 56% of patients favored the KA TKA, and 8% favored the MA TKA. Seventy four percent of patients favored the recovery of the KA TKA, and 6% favored the recovery of the MA TKA. Accordingly, a patient considering a contralateral KA TKA can expect that more often than not the KA TKA will have a higher FJS, a similar OKS, be their favorite knee, and recover faster. Present study is therapeutic and reflects level IV evidence.

Keywords

knee arthroplasty - kinematic alignment - Oxford knee score

Note

The study was approved by our ethical committee.

Publication History

Received: 05 March 2019

Accepted: 19 May 2019

Article published online:
09 July 2019

• References

• 1 Dossett HG, Estrada NA, Swartz GJ, LeFevre GW, Kwasman BG. A randomised controlled trial of kinematically and mechanically aligned total knee replacements: two-year clinical results. Bone Joint J 2014; 96-B [phone]
• 2 Calliess T, Bauer K, Stukenborg-Colsman C, Windhagen H, Budde S, Ettinger M. PSI kinematic versus non-PSI mechanical alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2017; 25 (06) 1743-1748
• 3 Matsumoto T, Takayama K, Ishida K, Hayashi S, Hashimoto S, Kuroda R. Radiological and clinical comparison of kinematically versus mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 2017; 99-B [phone]
• 4 Nam D, Nunley RM, Barrack RL. Patient dissatisfaction following total knee replacement: a growing concern?. Bone Joint J 2014; 96-B (11, Supple A) 96-100 DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B11.34152.
• 5 Waterson HB, Clement ND, Eyres KS, Mandalia VI, Toms AD. The early outcome of kinematic versus mechanical alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomised control trial. Bone Joint J 2016; 98-B (10) 1360-1368
• 6 Young SW, Walker ML, Bayan A, Briant-Evans T, Pavlou P, Farrington B. The Chitranjan S. Ranawat Award : no difference in 2-year functional outcomes using kinematic versus mechanical alignment in TKA: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2017; 475 (01) 9-20
• 7 Howell SM, Shelton TJ, Hull ML. Implant survival and function ten years after kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2018; 33 (12) 3678-3684
• 8 Nedopil AJ, Howell SM, Hull ML. What mechanisms are associated with tibial component failure after kinematically-aligned total knee arthroplasty?. Int Orthop 2017; 41 (08) 1561-1569
• 9 Nedopil AJ, Singh AK, Howell SM, Hull ML. Does calipered kinematically aligned TKA restore native left to right symmetry of the lower limb and improve function?. J Arthroplasty 2018; 33 (02) 398-406
• 10 Shelton TJ, Nedopil AJ, Howell SM, Hull ML. Do varus or valgus outliers have higher forces in the medial or lateral compartments than those which are in-range after a kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty? limb and joint line alignment after kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 2017; 99-B (10) 1319-1328
• 11 Howell SM, Hull ML, Mahfouz MR. Kinematically Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty. In: Scott S. ed. Insall and Scott Surgery of the Knee. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2017: 1784-1796
• 12 Howell SM, Papadopoulos S, Kuznik KT, Hull ML. Accurate alignment and high function after kinematically aligned TKA performed with generic instruments. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2013; 21 (10) 2271-2280
• 13 Nedopil AJ, Howell SM, Hull ML. Does malrotation of the tibial and femoral components compromise function in kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty?. Orthop Clin North Am 2016; 47 (01) 41-50
• 14 Rivière C, Iranpour F, Harris S. et al. The kinematic alignment technique for TKA reliably aligns the femoral component with the cylindrical axis. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2017; 103 (07) 1069-1073
• 15 Roth JD, Howell SM, Hull ML. Kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty limits high tibial forces, differences in tibial forces between compartments, and abnormal tibial contact kinematics during passive flexion. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2018; 26 (06) 1589-1601
• 16 Roth JD, Howell SM, Hull ML. Analysis of differences in laxities and neutral positions from native after kinematically aligned TKA using cruciate retaining implants. J Orthop Res 2019; 37 (02) 358-369
• 17 Paschos NK, Howell SM, Johnson JM, Mahfouz MR. Can kinematic tibial templates assist the surgeon locating the flexion and extension plane of the knee?. Knee 2017; 24 (05) 1006-1015
• 18 Roth JD, Howell SM, Hull ML. Native knee laxities at 0°, 45°, and 90° of flexion and their relationship to the goal of the gap-balancing alignment method of total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2015; 97: 1678-1684
• 19 Baker PN, van der Meulen JH, Lewsey J, Gregg PJ. National Joint Registry for England and Wales, Data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales. The role of pain and function in determining patient satisfaction after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007; 89 (07) 893-900
• 20 Thomsen MG, Latifi R, Kallemose T, Barfod KW, Husted H, Troelsen A. Good validity and reliability of the forgotten joint score in evaluating the outcome of total knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 2016; 87 (03) 280-285
• 21 Giesinger K, Hamilton DF, Jost B, Holzner B, Giesinger JM. Comparative responsiveness of outcome measures for total knee arthroplasty. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2014; 22 (02) 184-189
• 22 Hamilton DF, Loth FL, Giesinger JM. et al. Validation of the English language Forgotten Joint Score-12 as an outcome measure for total hip and knee arthroplasty in a British population. Bone Joint J 2017; 99-B [phone]
• 23 Giesinger JM, Behrend H, Hamilton DF. et al. Normative Values for the Forgotten Joint Score-12 for the US General Population. J Arthroplasty 2018; 34 (04) 650-655
• 24 Nam D, Lin KM, Howell SM, Hull ML. Femoral bone and cartilage wear is predictable at 0° and 90° in the osteoarthritic knee treated with total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2014; 22 (12) 2975-2981