Download PDF
Facial Plast Surg 2001; 17(4): 227-238
DOI: 10.1055/s-2001-18825
Copyright © 2001 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA. Tel.: +1(212) 584-4662

Proper Handling of Soft Tissue in the Acute Phase

Joseph Leach
  • Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
05 December 2001 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Proper handling of soft tissue in the acute phase demands proper attention to fundamental principles in wound evaluation, preparation, and repair. Foundational to immediate wound care is appropriate hemostasis and anesthesia. Correct soft tissue cleaning techniques are important, and the surgeon should understand special situations in which contamination may be a problem, including bites. The controversial issue of antibiotic prophylaxis is discussed. Certain wounds are not amenable to closure, but, where closure is indicated, orientation and preparation of the repair are important. Regional considerations important to the face are addressed. Numerous methods of wound closure are now available, and the advantages of each are enumerated. Postoperatively, attention to patient counseling, dressings, ointment, cleaning, and scar revision help assure an optimal outcome for the traumatized tissue.

KEYWORD

Laceration - wound - infection - cleaning - closure

REFERENCES

  • 1 Key S J, Thomas D W, Shepherd J P. The management of soft tissue facial wounds.  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg . 1995;  33 76-85
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Foster C A, Aston S J. Propranolol-epinephrine interaction. A potential disaster.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 1983;  72 74-77
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Magee C, Rodeheaver G T, Edgerton M T. Studies of the mechanisms by which epinephrine damages tissue defenses.  J Surg Res . 1977;  23 126-131
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Pryor G J, Kilpatrick W R, Opp D R. Local anesthesia in minor lacerations: topical TAC vs lidocaine infiltration.  Ann Emerg Med . 1980;  9 568-571
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Ernst A A, Marvez E, Nick T G, Chin E, Wood E, Gonzaba T. Lidocaine adrenaline tetracaine gel versus tetracaine adrenaline cocaine gel for topical anesthesia in linear scalp and facial lacerations in children aged 5 to 17 years.  Pediatrics . 1995;  95 255-258
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Ernst A A, Marvez-Valls E, Nick T G, Weiss S J. LAT (lidocaine-adrenaline-tetracaine) versus TAC (tetracaine-aderenaline-cocaine) for topical anesthesia in face and scalp lacerations.  Am J Emerg Med . 1995;  13 151-154
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Smith G A, Strausbaugh S D, Harbek-Weber C, Cohen D M, Shields B J, Powers J D. Tetracaine-licocaine-phenylephrine topical anesthesia compared with lidocaine infiltration during repair of mucous membrane lacerations in children.  Clin Pediatr . 1998;  37 405-412
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Lawrence L M, Wright S W. Sedation of pediatric patients for minor laceration repair: effect on length of emergency department stay and patient charges.  Pediatr Emerg Care . 1998;  14 393-395
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Connors K, Terndrup T E. Nasal versus oral midazolam for sedation of anxious children undergoing laceration repair.  Ann Emerg Med . 1994;  24 1074-1079
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Moy L S. Management of acute wounds.  Dermatol Clin . 1993;  11 759-766
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Dickinson J T, Jaquiss G W, Thompson J N. Soft tissue trauma.  Otolaryngol Clin North Am . 1976;  9 331-360
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Hollander J E, Richman P B, Werblud M, Miller T, Heggler J, Singer A J. Irrigation in facial and scalp lacerations: does it alter outcome?.  Ann Emerg Med . 1998;  31 73-77
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Geronemus R G, Mertz P M, Eaglstein W H. Wound healing: the effect of topical antimicrobial agents.  Arch Dermatol . 1979;  115 1131-1134
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Becker G. Identification and management of the patient at high risk for wound infection.  Head Neck Surg . 1986;  8 205
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Peterson A F, Rosenberg A, Alatory S D. Comparative evaluation of surgical scrub preparations.  Surg Gynecol Obstet . 1978;  146 63-65
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Lineweaver W, Howard R, Soucy D. Topical antimicrobial toxicity.  Arch Surg . 1985;  120 267-270
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Cole R, Robbins K, Cohen J. A predictive model for wound sepsis in oncologic surgery of the head and neck.  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg . 1987;  96 165-171
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Orlando M, Saltman R. Manual of Medical Therapeutics, 25th ed. Boston, MA: Little, Brown; . 1988: 446-448
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Morgan J P, Haug R H, Murphy M T. Management of facial dog bite injuries.  J Oral Maxillofac Surg . 1995;  53 435-441
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Krebs J W, Strine T W, Childs J E. Rabies surveillance in the United States during 1992.  J Am Vet Med Assoc . 1993;  203 1718-1731
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Corey L, Hattwick M. Treatment of persons exposed to rabies.  JAMA . 1975;  232 272-276
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Wolff K D. Management of animal bite injuries of the face: experience with 94 patients.  J Oral Maxillofac Surg . 1998;  56 838-843
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Stucker F J, Shaw G Y, Boyd S, Shockley W W. Management of animal and human bites in the head and neck.  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg . 1990;  116 789-793
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Guy J R, Zook E G. Successful treatment of acute head and neck dog bite wounds without antibiotics.  Ann Plastic Surg . 1986;  17 45-58
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Kountakis S E, Chamblee S A, Maillard A AJ, Stiernberg C M. Animal bites to the head and neck.  Ear Nose Throat J . 1998;  77 216-220
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Callaham M. Dog bite wounds.  JAMA . 1980;  244 2327-2328
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Maimaris C, Quinton D N. Dog bite lacerations: a controlled trial of primary wound closure.  Arch Emerg Med . 1988;  5 156-161
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Callaham M. Controversies in antibiotic choices for bite wounds.  Ann Emerg Med . 1988;  17 1321-1330
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Schuster G S. Oral flora and pathogenic organisms.  Infect Dis Clin North Am . 1999;  13 757-774
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 News and Notes. Transmission of HIV by human bite.  Lancet . 1987;  2 522
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Wahn V, Kramer J, Voit T. Horizontal transmission of HIV infection between two siblings.  Lancet . 1990;  336 502-503
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Agrawal K, Mishra S, Panda K N. Primary reconstruction of major human bite wounds of the face.  Plast Reconst Surg . 1992;  90 394-398
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Donkor P, Bankas D O. A study of primary closure of human bite injuries to the face.  J Oral Maxillofac Surg . 1997;  55 479-481
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Chidzonga M. Human bites of the face.  S Afr Med J . 1998;  88 150-152
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Wray R C. Force required for wound closure and scar appearance.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 1983;  72 380-382
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Madden J E, Edlich R F, Custer J R. Studies in the management of the contaminated wound. I.V.-Resistance to infection of surgical wounds made by knife, electrosurgery and laser.  Am J Surg . 1970;  119 222-224
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Howes E L, Harvey S C. The strength of healing wound in relation to the holding strength of the catgut suture.  N Engl J Med . 1929;  200 1285
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Magee C, Rodeheaver G T, Golden G T. Potentiation of wound infection by surgical drains.  Am J Surg . 1976;  131 547-549
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Edlich R F, Panek P H, Rodeheaver G T, Turnbull V G, Kurtz L D, Edgerton M T. Physical and chemical configuration of sutures in the development of surgical infection.  Ann Surg . 1973;  177 679-687
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Edlich R F, Rodeheaver G T, Thacker J G, Winn H R, Edgerton M T. Management of soft tissue injury.  Clin Plast Surg . 1977;  4 191-198
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Reiter D. Methods and materials for wound closure.  Otolaryngol Clin North Am . 1995;  28 1069-1080
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Capperauld I, Bucknall T E. Sutures and dressings. In: Bucknall TE, Ellis H, eds. Wound Healing for Surgeons London: Bailliere Tindall 1984: 75
    Google Scholar
  • 43 Osmond M H, Klassen T P, Quinn J V. Economic comparison of a tissue adhesive and suturing in the repair of pediatric facial lacerations.  J Pediatr . 1995;  126 892-895
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Guyuron B, Vaughan C. A comparison of absorbable and nonabsorbable suture materials for skin repair.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 1992;  89 234
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Meiring L, Cilliers K, Barry R. A comparison of a disposable skin stapler and nylon sutures for wound closure.  S Afr Med J . 1982;  62 371
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Rees T D. Is there a place for the staple gun in plastic surgery?.  Ann Plast Surg . 1978;  1 238
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Simon H K, Zempsky W T, Bruns T B, Sullivan K M. Lacerations against Langer's lines: to glue or suture?.  J Emerg Med . 1998;  16 185-189
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Osmond M H, Quinn J V, Sutcliffe T, Jarmuske M, Klassen T P. A randomized clinical trial comparing butylcyanoacrylate with octylcyanoacrylate in the management of selected pediatric facial lacerations.  Acad Emerg Med . 1999;  6 171-177
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Woodley D T, Chen J D, Kim J P. Re-epithelialization. Human keratinocyte locomotion.  Dermatol Clin . 1993;  11 641-646
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Noe J M, Keller M. Can stitches get wet?.  Plastic Reconst Surg . 1987;  81 82-83
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Eaglstein W H. Occlusive dressings.  J Dermatol Surg Oncol . 1993;  19 716-720
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Field C K, Kerstein M D. Overview of healing in a moist environment.  Am J Surg . 1994;  167(suppl) 2S-6S
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Linsky C B, Rovee D T, Dow, T. Effect of dressing on wound inflammation and scar tissue. In: Dineen P, Hildrick-Smith G, eds. The Surgical Wound Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger 1981: 191
    Google Scholar
  • 54 Brown C D, Zitelli J A. Choice of wound dressings and ointments.  Otolaryngol Clin North Am . 1995;  28 1081-1091
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Mertz P M, Marshall D A, Eaglstein, W H. Occlusive dressing to prevent bacterial invasion and wound infection.  J Am Acad Dermatol . 1985;  12 662-668
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Thomas D W, Hill M, Lewis M AO, Stephens P, Walker R, von der Weth A. Randomized clinical trial of the effect of semi-occlusive dressings on the microflora and clinical outcome of acute facial wounds.  Wound Rep Reg . 2000;  8 258-263
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Schauerhamer R A, Edlich R F, Panek P. Studies in the management of the contaminated wound. VII. Susceptibility of surgical wounds to postoperative surface contamination.  Am J Surg . 1971;  122 74-77
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Hirschmann J V. Topical antibiotics in dermatology.  Arch Dermatol . 1988;  124 1691-1700
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Physician's Desk Reference, 47th ed. Montvale, NJ: Medical Economics Data 1993 813 818 2187
    Google Scholar
  • 60 Mertz P M, Dunlop B W, Eaglstein W H. The effects of Bactroban ointment on epidermal wound healing in partial thickness wounds. In: Dobson R, Leyden JJ, Noble WC, et al., eds. Bactroban Princeton, NJ: Excerpta Medica 1985: 211
    Google Scholar
  • 61 Sproat J E, Dalcin A, Weitauer N, Roberts R S. Hypertrophic sternal scars, silicone gel sheet versus kenalog injection treatment.  Plas Reconst Surg . 1992;  90 988-992
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 62 Quinn K J, Evans J H, Courtney J M, Gaylor J DS. Non-pressure treatment of hypertrophic scars.  Burns Incl Therm Inj . 1985;  12 102
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 63 Ricketts C H, Martin L, Faria D T, Saed G M, Fivenson D P. Cytokine mRNA changes during the treatment of hypertrophic scars with silicone and nonsilicone gel dressings.  Dermatol Surg . 1996;  22 955-959
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 64 Harmon C B, Zelickson B D, Roenigk R K. Dermabrasive scar revision. Immunohistochemical and utrastructural evaluation.  Dermatol Surg . 1995;  21 503-508
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 65 Katz B E, Oca A G. A controlled study of the effectiveness of spot dermabrasion (`scarabrasion') on the appearance of surgical scars.  J Am Acad Dermatol . 1991;  24 262-266
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 66 Nehal K S, Levine V J, Ross B, Ashinoff R. Comparison of high-energy pulsed carbon dioxide laser resurfacing and dermabrasion in the revision of surgical scars.  Dermatol Surg . 1998;  24 647-650
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
      >