Download PDF
Endoscopy 2023; 55(07): 601-607
DOI: 10.1055/a-2018-1612
Original article

Can white-light endoscopy or narrow-band imaging avoid biopsy of colorectal endoscopic mucosal resection scars? A multicenter randomized single-blind crossover trial

Mafalda João
1   Gastroenterology Department, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
,
Miguel Areia 
1   Gastroenterology Department, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
,
Teresa Pinto-Pais
2   RISE@CI-IPO (Health Research Network), Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto / Porto Comprehensive Cancer Center, Porto, Portugal
,
Luís Correia Gomes 
3   Gastroenterology Department, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal
,
Sofia Saraiva 
3   Gastroenterology Department, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal
,
Susana Alves
1   Gastroenterology Department, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
,
Luís Elvas 
1   Gastroenterology Department, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
,
Daniel Brito
1   Gastroenterology Department, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
,
Sandra Saraiva
1   Gastroenterology Department, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
,
Armando Teixeira-Pinto
4   Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
,
Isabel Claro
3   Gastroenterology Department, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal
,
Mário Dinis-Ribeiro
2   RISE@CI-IPO (Health Research Network), Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto / Porto Comprehensive Cancer Center, Porto, Portugal
5   Department of Community Medicine, Health Information and Decision, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
,
Ana Teresa Cadime
1   Gastroenterology Department, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
› Author AffiliationsTrial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Registration number (trial ID): NCT04239365 Type of study: multicentre randomized single-blinded crossover trial
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Referred to by:

Can we stop routine biopsy of post-endoscopic mucosal resection scars?Endoscopy 2023; 55(07): 608-610
DOI: 10.1055/a-2085-5660

Abstract

Background Current guidelines suggest that routine biopsy of post-endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) scars can be abandoned, provided that a standardized imaging protocol with virtual chromoendoscopy is used. However, few studies have examined the accuracy of advanced endoscopic imaging, such as narrow-band imaging (NBI) vs. white-light endoscopy (WLE) for prediction of histological recurrence. We aimed to assess whether NBI accuracy is superior to that of WLE and whether one or both techniques can replace biopsies.

Methods The study was a multicenter, randomized, pathologist-blind, crossover trial, with consecutive patients undergoing first colonoscopy after EMR of lesions ≥ 20 mm. Computer-generated randomization and opaque envelope concealed allocation. Patients were randomly assigned to scar examination with NBI followed by WLE (NBI + WLE), or WLE followed by NBI (WLE + NBI). Histology was the reference method, with biopsies being performed for all tissues.

Results The study included 203 scars (103 in the NBI + WLE group, 100 in the WLE + NBI group). Recurrence was confirmed histologically in 29.6 % of the scars. The diagnostic accuracy of NBI was not statistically different from that of WLE (95 % [95 %CI 92 %–98 %] vs. 94 % [95 %CI 90 %–97 %]; P = 0.48). The negative predictive values (NPVs) were 96 % (95 %CI 93 %–99 %) for NBI and 93 % (95 %CI 89 %–97 %) for WLE (P = 0.06).

Conclusions The accuracy of NBI for the diagnosis of recurrence was not superior to that of WLE. Endoscopic assessment of EMR scars with WLE and NBI achieved an NPV that would allow routine biopsy to be avoided in cases of negative optical diagnosis.

Supplementary material



Publication History

Received: 26 June 2022

Accepted after revision: 23 January 2023

Accepted Manuscript online:
23 January 2023

Article published online:
24 February 2023

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 Kaltenbach T, Anderson JC, Burke CA. et al. Endoscopic removal of colorectal lesions: recommendations by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 2020; 115: 435-464
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Ferlitsch M, Moss A, Hassan C. et al. Colorectal polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR): European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline. Endoscopy 2017; 49: 270-297
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Hwang JH, Konda V, Abu Dayyeh BK. et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 82: 215-226
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Hassan C, Antonelli G, Dumonceau JM. et al. Post-polypectomy colonoscopy surveillance: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline – Update 2020. Endoscopy 2020; 52: 687-700
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Gupta S, Lieberman D, Anderson JC. et al. Recommendations for follow-up after colonoscopy and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 2020; 115: 415-434
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Belderbos TD, Leenders M, Moons LM. et al. Local recurrence after endoscopic mucosal resection of nonpedunculated colorectal lesions: systematic review and meta-analysis. Endoscopy 2014; 46: 388-402
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Knabe M, Pohl J, Gerges C. et al. Standardized long-term follow-up after endoscopic resection of large, nonpedunculated colorectal lesions: a prospective two-center study. Am J Gastroenterol 2014; 109: 183-189
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Shahid MW, Buchner AM, Heckman MG. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy and narrow band imaging for small colorectal polyps: a feasibility study. Am J Gastroenterol 2012; 107: 231-239
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Desomer L, Tutticci N, Tate DJ. et al. A standardized imaging protocol is accurate in detecting recurrence after EMR. Gastrointest Endosc 2017; 85: 518-526
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Kandel P, Brand EC, Pelt J. et al. Endoscopic scar assessment after colorectal endoscopic mucosal resection scars: when is biopsy necessary (EMR Scar Assessment Project for Endoscope (ESCAPE) trial). Gut 2019; 68: 1633-1641
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Riu Pons F, Andreu M, Gimeno Beltran J. et al. Narrow band imaging and white light endoscopy in the characterization of a polypectomy scar: a single-blind observational study. World J Gastroenterol 2018; 24: 5179-5188
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Zorron Cheng Tao Pu L, Chiam KH, Yamamura T. et al. Narrow-band imaging for scar (NBI-SCAR) classification: from conception to multicenter validation. Gastrointest Endosc 2020; 91: 1146-1154
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 [Anonymous]. The Paris endoscopic classification of superficial neoplastic lesions: esophagus, stomach, and colon: November 30 to December 1, 2002. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 58: S3-43
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Hayashi N, Tanaka S, Hewett DG. et al. Endoscopic prediction of deep submucosal invasive carcinoma: validation of the narrow-band imaging international colorectal endoscopic (NICE) classification. Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 78: 625-632
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Hewett DG, Kaltenbach T, Sano Y. et al. Validation of a simple classification system for endoscopic diagnosis of small colorectal polyps using narrow-band imaging. Gastroenterology 2012; 143: 599-607
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Abu Dayyeh BK, Thosani N, Konda V. et al. ASGE Technology Committee systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the ASGE PIVI thresholds for adopting real-time endoscopic assessment of the histology of diminutive colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 81: 502.e1-502.e16
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Rees CJ, Rajasekhar PT, Wilson A. et al. Narrow band imaging optical diagnosis of small colorectal polyps in routine clinical practice: the Detect Inspect Characterise Resect and Discard 2 (DISCARD 2) study. Gut 2017; 66: 887-895
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Iwatate M, Sano Y, Hattori S. et al. The addition of high magnifying endoscopy improves rates of high confidence optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps. Endosc Int Open 2015; 3: E140-145
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Tate DJ, Desomer L, Klein A. et al. Adenoma recurrence after piecemeal colonic EMR is predictable: the Sydney EMR recurrence tool. Gastrointest Endosc 2017; 85: 647-656
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Moss A, Bourke MJ, Williams SJ. et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection outcomes and prediction of submucosal cancer from advanced colonic mucosal neoplasia. Gastroenterology 2011; 140: 1909-1918
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Tate DJ, Bahin FF, Desomer L. et al. Cold-forceps avulsion with adjuvant snare-tip soft coagulation (CAST) is an effective and safe strategy for the management of non-lifting large laterally spreading colonic lesions. Endoscopy 2018; 50: 52-62
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Sidhu M, Shahidi N, Gupta S. et al. Outcomes of thermal ablation of the mucosal defect margin after endoscopic mucosal resection: a prospective, international, multicenter trial of 1000 large nonpedunculated colorectal polyps. Gastroenterology 2021; 161: 163-170
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Klein A, Tate DJ, Jayasekeran V. et al. Thermal ablation of mucosal defect margins reduces adenoma recurrence after colonic endoscopic mucosal resection. Gastroenterology 2019; 156: 604-613
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar