Sollten wir alle zur En Bloc Resektion von Blasentumoren wechseln?

Zusammenfassung

Bei der En-Bloc-Resektion von Blasentumoren (ERBT) erfolgt die Abtragung von Tumoren nicht fragmentiert, sondern sie werden in einer Schicht präpariert und, wenn möglich, in toto extrahiert. Diese Methode repräsentiert einen Paradigmenwechsel in der Behandlung nicht muskelinvasiver Blasentumore und bietet gegenüber der konventionellen transurethralen Resektion der Blase (TUR-B) diverse Vorteile. Insbesondere erlauben die so gewonnen histologischen Präparate eine genauere Aufarbeitung, was eine präzisere Stadieneinteilung ermöglicht. Zudem wird häufiger Detrusormuskulatur im Präparat nachgewiesen, was auf eine komplettere Tumorentfernung hindeutet. In den letzten Jahren festigt sich eine stabile Datenbasis, die die Vorteile dieser Technik bekräftigt. So wurde kürzlich in einer multizentrischen, prospektiv-randomisierten Studie erstmals ein signifikanter Vorteil hinsichtlich der Rezidivrate nach 12 Monaten im Vergleich zur TUR-B nachgewiesen. Versierte Endourologen sollten sich mit dieser Technik befassen, da sie sich mittelfristig zum Standard entwickeln könnte. Die Technik ist zu gut und zu elegant, um ignoriert zu werden.

Abstract

In En-Bloc Resection of Bladder Tumours (ERBT), tumours are not removed in fragments, but are dissected in one layer and, if possible, extracted in one piece. This method represents a significant shift in the surgical management of non-muscle-invasive bladder tumours, providing multiple benefits over the traditional transurethral resection of the bladder (TUR-B). The histological analysis of ERBT specimens is more accurate, enhancing diagnostic precision. Additionally, the presence of detrusor muscle in ERBT specimens is more frequent, indicating a more complete removal of the tumours. Recent years have seen the consolidation of a robust evidence base emphasizing the advantages of ERBT. Notably, a multicentric, prospective randomized trial has recently revealed a significant reduction in recurrence rates at 12 months follow-up compared with TUR-B. Experienced endourologists should explore this technique, as it may soon become the standard of care. The techniqueʼs elegance and effectiveness make it too important to be ignored.

Schlüsselwörter

ERBT - En Bloc Resektion - TUR-B - Urothelkarzinom

Keywords

ERBT - NMIBC - TUR-B - urothelial carcinoma - en-bloc resection

Publication History

Received: 29 January 2024

Accepted after revision: 04 March 2024

Article published online:
23 April 2024

• Referenzen

• 1 Babjuk M, Burger M, Comperat EM. et al. European Association of Urology Guidelines on Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer (TaT1 and Carcinoma In Situ) - 2019 Update. Eur Urol 2019; 76: 639-657 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.08.016. (PMID: 31443960)
• 2 Oswald D, Pallauf M, Herrmann T. et al. Transurethrale Resektion von Blasentumoren (TUR-B)Transurethral resection of bladder tumors (TURBT). Der Urologe 2022; 61 DOI: 10.1007/s00120-021-01741-z.
• 3 Hofmann R. Endoskopische Urologie: Atlas und Lehrbuch. Berlin: Springer; 2018. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-53981-1
• 4 Akand M, Muilwijk T, Raskin Y. et al. Quality Control Indicators for Transurethral Resection of Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2019; 17: e784-e792 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2019.04.014. (PMID: 31097388)
• 5 Pycha A, Palermo S. How to teach the teacher to teach the TUR-B. Int J Surg 2007; 5: 81-85 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2006.01.013. (PMID: 17448969)
• 6 Schulze M, Stotz N, Rassweiler J. Retrospective analysis of transurethral resection, second-look resection, and long-term chemo-metaphylaxis for superficial bladder cancer: indications and efficacy of a differentiated approach. J Endourol 2007; 21: 1533-1541 DOI: 10.1089/end.2007.9866. (PMID: 18186695)
• 7 Brausi M, Collette L, Kurth K. et al. Variability in the recurrence rate at first follow-up cystoscopy after TUR in stage Ta T1 transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder: a combined analysis of seven EORTC studies. Eur Urol 2002; 41: 523-531 DOI: 10.1016/s0302-2838(02)00068-4. (PMID: 12074794)
• 8 Kitamura K, Kataoka K, Fujioka H. et al. Transurethral resection of a bladder tumor by the use of a polypectomy snare. The Journal of urology 1980; 124: 808-809 (PMID: 7192323)
• 9 Ukai R, Kawashita E, Ikeda H. A new technique for transurethral resection of superficial bladder tumor in 1 piece. The Journal of urology 2000; 163: 878-879 (PMID: 10687997)
• 10 Herrmann TRW. En bloc resection of bladder tumors (ERBT) revisited 12 years after reintroduction: too good to be further ignored. World J Urol 2023; 41: 2577-2582 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04629-z. (PMID: 37819587)
• 11 Teoh JY, MacLennan S, Chan VW. et al. An International Collaborative Consensus Statement on En Bloc Resection of Bladder Tumour Incorporating Two Systematic Reviews, a Two-round Delphi Survey, and a Consensus Meeting. Eur Urol 2020; 78: 546-569 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.04.059. (PMID: 32389447)
• 12 Territo A, Bevilacqua G, Meneghetti I. et al. En bloc resection of bladder tumors: indications, techniques, and future directions. Curr Opin Urol 2020; 30: 421-427 DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000000737. (PMID: 32205806)
• 13 Enikeev D, Babjuk M, Shpikina A. et al. En bloc resection for nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer: selecting a proper laser. Curr Opin Urol 2022; 32: 173-178 DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000000968. (PMID: 34954702)
• 14 Teoh JY, Mayor N, Li KM. et al. En-bloc resection of bladder tumour as primary treatment for patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: routine implementation in a multi-centre setting. World journal of urology 2021; 39: 3353-3358 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-021-03675-9.
• 15 Teoh JY. Transurethral Modified En Bloc Resection For Large Bladder Tumours. NCT04081246. 2023 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04547-0
• 16 Yanagisawa T, Mori K, Motlagh RS. et al. En Bloc Resection for Bladder Tumors: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Its Differential Effect on Safety, Recurrence and Histopathology. J Urol 2022; 207: 754-768 DOI: 10.1097/ju.0000000000002444. (PMID: 35060770)
• 17 Gallioli A, Diana P, Fontana M. et al. En Bloc Versus Conventional Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumors: A Single-center Prospective Randomized Noninferiority Trial. Eur Urol Oncol 2022; 5: 440-448 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2022.05.001. (PMID: 35618567)
• 18 Capogrosso P, Capitanio U, Ventimiglia E. et al. Detrusor Muscle in TUR-Derived Bladder Tumor Specimens: Can We Actually Improve the Surgical Quality?. J Endourol 2016; 30: 400-405 DOI: 10.1089/end.2015.0591. (PMID: 26597334)
• 19 Shoshany O, Mano R, Margel D. et al. Presence of detrusor muscle in bladder tumor specimens--predictors and effect on outcome as a measure of resection quality. Urol Oncol 2014; 32: e17-22 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2013.04.009.
• 20 Teoh J, Chan T-Y, Tsang I. et al. PD13–11 Transurethral en bloc resection versus standard resection of bladder tumour: A multi-center randomized trial (EB-STAR Study). Journal of Urology 2023; 209: e409 DOI: 10.1097/JU.0000000000003260.11.
• 21 Teoh YCJ, Chan T, Tsang C. et al. A0707 - Transurethral en bloc resection versus standard resection of bladder tumour: A multi-center randomized trial (EB-StaR Study). European Urology 2023; 83: S997-S998 DOI: 10.1016/S0302-2838(23)00751-0.
• 22 Yanagisawa T, Yorozu T, Miki J. et al. Feasibility and accuracy of pathological diagnosis in en-bloc transurethral resection specimens versus conventional transurethral resection specimens of bladder tumour: evaluation with pT1 substaging by 10 pathologists. Histopathology 2021; 78: 943-950 DOI: 10.1111/his.14307.
• 23 D'Andrea D, Soria F, Hurle R. et al. En Bloc Versus Conventional Resection of Primary Bladder Tumor (eBLOC): A Prospective, Multicenter, Open-label, Phase 3 Randomized Controlled Trial. European urology oncology 2023; 6: 508-515 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.07.010. (PMID: 37865570)
• 24 Assem A, Kassem A, Sherif M. et al. Safety, feasibility, and quality of thulium laser en-bloc resection for treatment of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. International urology and nephrology 2023; 55: 3103-3109 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-023-03752-5. (PMID: 37639155)
• 25 Diana P, Gallioli A, Fontana M. et al. Energy source comparison in en-bloc resection of bladder tumors: subanalysis of a single-center prospective randomized study. World journal of urology 2023; 41: 2591-2597 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-022-04042-y. (PMID: 35639159)
• 26 Sun S, Wang H, Zhang X. et al. Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor: Novel Techniques in a New Era. Bladder 2023; 10: e21200009 DOI: 10.14440/bladder.2023.865. (PMID: 38022709)
• 27 Sato S, Yanagisawa T, Miki J. et al. pT1 Subclassification Predicts Progression-Free Survival in En Bloc Resection of Bladder Tumor Specimens. Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine. 2023 DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2023-0044-OA
• 28 Gobbo A, Fasulo V, Contieri R. et al. Clinical and pathological predictors of persistent T1 HG at second resection. Urologia 2023; 90: 482-490 DOI: 10.1177/03915603231181619. (PMID: 37341094)
• 29 Guven S, Colecchia M, Oltulu P. et al. How do endoscopic bladder tumor resection techniques affect pathology practice? EAU Section of Uro-Technology (ESUT) and Uropathology (ESUP) survey. World journal of urology 2023; 41: 2617-2625 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-022-04022-2. (PMID: 35567624)
• 30 Teoh JY, D'Andrea D, Gallioli A. et al. En bloc resection of bladder tumour: the rebirth of past through reminiscence. World journal of urology 2023; 41: 2599-2606 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04547-0.