Download PDF
Osteologie 2024; 33(02): 80-87
DOI: 10.1055/a-2254-0454
Review

Positive und negative (Neben)Effekte bei Osteoporose-Sequenztherapie

Positive and Negative (Side)Effects of Osteoporosis-Specific Sequential Therapy
Barbara Obermayer-Pietsch 
1   Universitätsklinik für Innere Medizin und Universitätsklinik für Frauenheilkunde & Geburtshilfe, Medizinische Universität Graz, Graz, Austria
,
Ines Fößl
1   Universitätsklinik für Innere Medizin und Universitätsklinik für Frauenheilkunde & Geburtshilfe, Medizinische Universität Graz, Graz, Austria
,
Friederike Thomasius
2   Frankfurt Center for Bone Health and Endocrinology, Frankfurt, Germany
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Indikationen und Abläufe rund um pharmakologischen Optionen für die Osteoporosetherapie wurden in den vergangenen Jahren neu beleuchtet. Dazu zählen neben den bekannten therapeutischen Effekten auf Knochenstoffwechsel, -struktur und Frakturrisiko auch teils weniger bekannte positive (Neben-)Effekte und einige, wenn auch seltene, gravierende Nebenwirkungen dieser Medikamente. Als positive (Neben-)Effekte wurden bei Bisphosphonaten u. a. die Reduktion von kardiovaskulären Ereignissen, die verminderte Inzidenz von Karzinomen und eine insgesamt verminderte Mortalität beschrieben, es gab bei suffizienter Basistherapie aber u. a. auch reduzierte Raten für COVID-Infektionen und -Hospitalisierungen. Antiresorptiva können seltene, aber erhebliche Nebenwirkungen bei Betroffenen bewirken, u. a. sind es atypische Schenkelhalsbrüche (AFF, „atypical femoral fractures“), die in 0.02% der Fälle bei langdauernder Behandlung auftreten. Vielbeachtet sind Kieferosteonekrosen (MRONJ, „Medication-Related OsteoNecrosis of the Jaw“), die vermehrt bei hohen und häufigen Dosen, etwa bei onkologischer Indikation auftreten und bei Osteoporose-Indikation in 0.001%-0.01% der Betroffenen mit Osteoporosetherapie-Schemata gefunden werden. Zu Augen-assoziierten Symptomen (BROSE, „Bisphosphonat-Related Ocular Side Effects”) sind bisher etwa zwei Dutzend Fälle weltweit publiziert worden. In dieser Übersichtsarbeit werden wichtige Daten und Mechanismen zu Nebeneffekten der Osteoporose-Therapeutika auch bei speziellen Personengruppen zusammengefasst und neue Entwicklungen im Rahmen einer Osteoporose-Sequenztherapie sowie Vorsorgemaßnahmen beschrieben.

Abstract

Indications and procedures around pharmacological options for osteoporosis therapeutics have been reviewed during the past years. Besides well-known therapeutic effects on bone metabolism, structure and fracture risk, several positive effects outside the bone have been recorded; however, also a number of rare, but serious side effects caused by bone-active medication. Positive effects were recorded for beneficial impacts on cardiovascular events, reduced incidences for carcinomas and reduced mortality, but also reduced infection and hospitalisation rates for COVID with sufficient baseline therapies. However, antiresorptive therapies may have rare, but severe side effects - e. g., atypical femoral fractures (AFF), occurring in 0.02% of cases, mostly during long-standing treatments. Widely noticed side effects are “Medication-Related OsteoNecroses of the Jaw“ bone (MRONJ), mainly related to high and long-standing doses of antiresorptive medication applied for oncological reasons, while occurring in 0.001%-0.01% of osteoporosis patients. Eye-related symptoms (BROSE, „Bisphosphonat-Related Ocular Side Effects”), have been described in some twenty cases worldwide. In this review, descriptions and mechanisms about side effects of osteoporosis medication are summarized also for special patient groups. New developments including sequential therapy as well as prophylactic measures are described.

Schlüsselwörter

Osteoporose - Therapie - Risikofaktoren - Nebeneffekte

Keywords

Osteoporosis - Therapy - Side effects - Risk factors


Publication History

Received: 02 January 2024

Accepted: 24 January 2024

Article published online:
16 May 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Foessl I, Dimai HP, Obermayer-Pietsch B. Long-term and sequential treatment for osteoporosis. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2023; 19: 520-533
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Reid IR. Osteoporosis treatment: focus on safety. Eur J Intern Med 2013; 24: 691-697
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Murdoch R, Mellar A, Horne AM. et al. Effect of a Three-Day Course of Dexamethasone on Acute Phase Response Following Treatment With Zoledronate: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Bone Miner Res 2023; 38: 631-638
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Fuggle N, Al-Daghri N, Bock O. et al. Novel formulations of oral bisphosphonates in the treatment of osteoporosis. Aging Clin Exp Res 2022; 34: 2625-2634
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Zheng X, Ye J, Zhan Q. et al. Prediction of musculoskeletal pain after the first intravenous zoledronic acid injection in patients with primary osteoporosis: development and evaluation of a new nomogram. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2023; 24: 841
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Kanagalingam T, Khan T, Sultan N. et al. Reducing the risk of denosumab-induced hypocalcemia in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease: a quality improvement initiative. Arch Osteoporos 2023; 18: 138
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Tong YYF, Holmes S, Sefton A. Early bisphosphonate therapy post proximal femoral fracture fixation does not impact fracture healing: a systematic review and meta-analysis. ANZ J Surg 2022; 92: 2840-2848
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Eriksen EF, Lyles KW, Colón-Emeric CS. et al. Antifracture efficacy and reduction of mortality in relation to timing of the first dose of zoledronic acid after hip fracture. J Bone Miner Res 2009; 24: 1308-1313
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Hesse E, Böcker W, Kammerlander C. et al. Etablierung von Frakturnetzwerken in Deutschland [Establishment of fracture liaison services in Germany]. Unfallchirurg 2019; 122: 766-770
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Lyles KW, Colón-Emeric CS, Magaziner JS. et al. HORIZON Recurrent Fracture Trial. Zoledronic acid and clinical fractures and mortality after hip fracture. N Engl J Med 2007; 357: 1799-1809
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Beaupre LA, Morrish DW, Hanley DA. et al. Oral bisphosphonates are associated with reduced mortality after hip fracture. Osteoporos Int 2011; 22: 983-991
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Bliuc D, Tran T, van Geel T. et al. CaMOS Research Group. Mortality risk reduction differs according to bisphosphonate class: a 15-year observational study. Osteoporos Int 2019; 30: 817-828
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Thompson J, Wang Y, Dreischulte T. et al. Association between bisphosphonate use and COVID-19 related outcomes. Elife 2023; 12: e79548
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Reid IR, Horne AM, Mihov B. et al. Fracture Prevention with Zoledronate in Older Women with Osteopenia. N Engl J Med 2018; 379: 2407-2416
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Early Breast Cancer Trialistsʼ Collaborative Group (EBCTCG). Adjuvant bisphosphonate treatment in early breast cancer: meta-analyses of individual patient data from randomised trials. Lancet 2015; 386: 1353-1361
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Koshiyama H, Nakamura Y, Tanaka S. et al. Decrease in carotid intima-media thickness after 1-year therapy with etidronate for osteopenia associated with type 2 diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2000; 85: 2793-2796
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Sing CW, Wong AY, Kiel DP. et al. Association of Alendronate and Risk of Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Hip Fracture. J Bone Miner Res 2018; 33: 1422-1434
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Shoung A, Shoung N, Hii R. et al. Electrocardiogram Changes Following Intravenous Bisphosphonate Infusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Bone Miner Res 2023; 38: 1679-1688
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Spangler L, Nielson CM, Brookhart MA. et al. Cardiovascular Safety in Postmenopausal Women and Men With Osteoporosis Treated With Denosumab and Zoledronic Acid: A Post-Authorization Safety Study. JBMR Plus 2023; 7: e10793
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Zheng J, Wheeler E, Pietzner M. et al. Lowering of Circulating Sclerostin May Increase Risk of Atherosclerosis and Its Risk Factors: Evidence From a Genome-Wide Association Meta-Analysis Followed by Mendelian Randomization. Arthritis Rheumatol 2023; 75: 1781-1792
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Cosman F, Crittenden DB, Adachi JD. et al. Romosozumab Treatment in Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 2016; 375: 1532-1543
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Taylor KH, Middlefell LS, Mizen KD. Osteonecrosis of the jaws induced by anti-RANK ligand therapy. Br J Oral. Maxillofac Surg 2010; 48: 221-223
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Nicolatou-Galitis O, Schiødt M, Mendes RA. et al. Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw: definition and best practice for prevention, diagnosis, and treatment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2019; 127: 117-135
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Khan AA, Morrison A, Kendler DL. et al. International Task Force on Osteonecrosis of the Jaw. Case-Based Review of Osteonecrosis of the Jaw (ONJ) and Application of the International Recommendations for Management From the International Task Force on ONJ. J Clin Densitom 2017; 20: 8-24
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 the ONJ task force. Ali DS, Khan AA, Morrison A. Antiresorptive Therapy to Reduce Fracture Risk and Effects on Dental Implant Outcomes in Patients with Osteoporosis: A Systematic Review and Consensus Statement. in print JBMR. 2024
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Everts-Graber J, Reichenbach S, Gahl B. et al. Effects of zoledronate on bone mineral density and bone turnover after long-term denosumab therapy: Observations in a real-world setting. Bone 2022; 163: 116498
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Kaku T, Oh Y, Sato S. et al. Prevalence of Precursory Signs of Atypical Femoral Fractures in Patients Receiving Bone-Modifying Agents for Bone Metastases: A Cross-Sectional Study. JBMR Plus 2023; 7: e10749
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Zhou W, van Rooij JG, van de Laarschot DM. et al. Prevalence of Monogenic Bone Disorders in a Dutch Cohort of Atypical Femur Fracture Patients. J Bone Miner Res 2023; 38: 896-906
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Byun SE, Lee KJ, Shin WC. et al. The effect of teriparatide on fracture healing after atypical femoral fracture: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int 2023; 34: 1323-1334
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 van de Laarschot DM, McKenna MJ, Abrahamsen B. et al. Medical Management of Patients After Atypical Femur Fractures: a Systematic Review and Recommendations From the European Calcified Tissue Society. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2020; 105: 1682-1699
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Krege JH, Gilsenan AW, Komacko JL, Kellier-Steele N. Teriparatide and osteosarcoma risk: history, science, elimination of boxed warning, and other label updates. JBMR Plus 2022; 6: e10665
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Zhan T, Rindtorf N, Boutros M. Wnt signaling in cancer. Oncogene 2017; 36: 1461-1473
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Swami S, Johnson J, Bettinson LA. et al. Prevention of breast cancer skeletal metastases with parathyroid hormone. JCI Insight 2017; 2: e90874
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Gilsenan A, Harding A, Kellier-Steele N. et al. The Forteo Patient Registry linkage to multiple state cancer registries: study design and results from the first 8 years. Osteoporos Int 2018; 29: 2335-2343
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Gendelman O, Tripto-Shkolnik L, Vered I, Lidar M. Bisphosphonates Related Ocular Side Effects: A Case Series and Review of Literature. Ocul Immunol Inflamm 2022; 30: 1995-1999
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Chartrand NA, Lau CK, Parsons MT. et al. Ocular Side Effects of Bisphosphonates: A Review of Literature. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther 2023; 39: 3-16
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Tsourdi E, Zillikens MC, Meier C. et al. Fracture risk and management of discontinuation of denosumab therapy: a systematic review and position statement by ECTS. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2020; dgaa756
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Kong SH, Kim JH, Kim SW. et al. Effect of Denosumab on the Change of Osteoclast Precursors Compared to Zoledronate Treatment in Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis. J Bone Metab 2022; 29: 93-101
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Sølling AS, Tsourdi E, Harsløf T. et al. Denosumab discontinuation. Curr Osteoporos Rep 2023; 21: 95-103
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Boonen S, Ferrari S, Miller PD. et al. Postmenopausal osteoporosis treatment with antiresorptives: effects of discontinuation or long-term continuation on bone turnover and fracture risk – a perspective. J Bone Miner Res 2012; 27: 963-974
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar