The Isosceles Nasal Tip—Laser-Assisted Midline Assessment in Rhinoplasty

Abstract

The accurate determination of the nasal tip's spatial location is crucial for achieving symmetry in rhinoplasty. Even minor deviations can result in asymmetrical lengths and configurations of the nostrils. Our approach centers on defining the nasal tip position by establishing the midline of the nasal base and projecting an isosceles triangle. This triangle, with the tip as the vertex and alar creases as angles, ensures symmetric sidewalls. The symmetry axis, derived from the isosceles triangle, guides the placement of the tip sidewalls and columella. To implement this, we use anatomical benchmarks such as the implantation of the nasal base and position of the alar creases, considering inherent facial asymmetries. We introduce a laser gadget as an auxiliary tool, projecting perpendicular lines to guide precise midline alignment. Marking specific points, including interbrow midpoint and alar creases, ensures accuracy. In the past 12 months, we applied this methodology in 247 rhinoplasty cases, observing improved outcomes and patient satisfaction. Our proposal of utilizing isosceles triangles provides a streamlined approach to achieving symmetry. The laser device, while beneficial, should be viewed as supportive rather than an absolute guiding measure.

Keywords

rhinoplasty - laser-assisted rhinoplasty - facial asymmetry - nose - isosceles - tip

Publication History

Article published online:
11 May 2024

• References

• 1 Gruber RP, Holland M, Rochlin D, Sue G, Moshrefi S. Aesthetic science of rhinoplasty: three principles. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2022; 46 (05) 2588-2598
• 2 Rohrich RJ, Villanueva NL, Small KH, Pezeshk RA. Implications of facial asymmetry in rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 140 (03) 510-516
• 3 Fishman Z, Whyne CM, Hope A, Fialkov JA. Modeling and measuring average nasal asymmetry by dorsum midline and nose tip lateral deviation. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2021; 74 (04) 857-865
• 4 Carvalho B, Ballin AC, Becker RV, Berger CA, Hurtado JG, Mocellin M. Rhinoplasty and facial asymmetry: analysis of subjective and anthropometric factors in the Caucasian nose. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2012; 16 (04) 445-451
• 5 Sözen T, Dizdar D, Göksel A. Awareness of facial asymmetry and its impact on postoperative satisfaction of rhinoplasty patient. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2021; 45 (01) 214-220
• 6 Lee KH, Kang JW, Lee HY, Kim SJ. Ideal reference lines for assessment of facial asymmetry in rhinoplasty patients. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2022; 46 (01) 321-328
• 7 Hashemi SM, Afshari E, Ghazavi H. Prevalence of facial asymmetry and correction methods for rhinoplasty in individuals with deviated nose: a brief review. World J Plast Surg 2022; 11 (02) 18-23
• 8 Chatrath P, De Cordova J, Nouraei SA, Ahmed J, Saleh HA. Objective assessment of facial asymmetry in rhinoplasty patients. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2007; 9 (03) 184-187
• 9 Triângulo Isósceles. [Internet]. Todamateria; c2023 [citado noviembre 30, 2023]. Disponible en: https://www.cuemath.com/geometry/isosceles-triangles/
• 10 Celikoyar MM, Pérez MF, Akbaş MI, Topsakal O. Facial surface anthropometric features and measurements with an emphasis on rhinoplasty. Aesthet Surg J 2022; 42 (02) 133-148 Erratum in: Aesthet Surg J 2021; PMID: 33855336
• 11 DeSerres JJ, Fishman Z, Whyne CM, Kiss A, Fialkov JA. Assessing the nasal midline in rhinoplasty: how good are we?. J Craniofac Surg 2023; 34 (01) 177-180
• 12 Dasdar S, Kianfar N, Sadeghi M, Saedi B. The impact of facial asymmetry on the surgical outcome of crooked nose: a case control study. Aesthet Surg J 2021; 41 (06) NP284-NP294
• 13 Vuyk HD. A review of practical guidelines for correction of the deviated, asymmetric nose. Rhinology 2000; 38 (02) 72-78
• 14 Yi JS, Jang YJ. Frequency and characteristics of facial asymmetry in patients with deviated noses. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2015; 17 (04) 265-269
• 15 Kosins AM, Daniel RK, Nguyen DP. Rhinoplasty: the asymmetric crooked nose-an overview. Facial Plast Surg 2016; 32 (04) 361-373