Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1007/s12593-013-0106-2
A Comparison of the Reliability of Make Versus Break Testing in Measuring Palmar Abduction Strength of the Thumb
Subject Editor:
Publication History
18 April 2013
02 October 2013
Publication Date:
13 September 2016 (online)
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/10.1055-s-00031417/201401/lookinside/thumbnails/10-1007-s12593-013-0106-2-1.jpg)
Abstract
Previous studies have established the role of quantitative measurements of palmar abduction strength of the thumb (PAST). This study compares the reliability of the ‘make’ versus the ‘break’ test in measuring PAST in healthy volunteers. In a ‘make’ test, the body part being tested is positioned at the start of its range of motion and the participant is asked to exert his/her maximal force. In a ‘break’ test, increasing force is applied to a body part after it has completed its range of motion, until the joint being tested gives way. PAST was measured in both hands in 100 healthy volunteers using a handheld device. Two examiners measured PAST using both the ‘make’ and ‘break’ test to determine inter-rater reliability. The tests were repeated in 30 volunteers 6 weeks after the initial testing to determine intra-rater reliability. Our results showed that the ‘make’ test has better inter and intra-rater reliability.
-
References
- 1 Nallakarnpan V, Tung EY, Sebastin SJ et al The effect of blocking radial abduction on palmar abduction strength of the thumb. J Hand Surg Eur 2012; 37: 269-274
- 2 Fleiss JL, Levin B, Paik MC. In: Fleiss JL, Levin B, Paik MC. The measurement of interrater agreement, Statistical methods for rates and proportions. Wiley-Interscience, New York; 2003: 598-626
- 3 Bohannon RW. Make tests and break tests of elbow flexor muscle strength. Phys Ther 1988; 68: 193-194
- 4 Stratford PW, Balsor BE. A comparison of make and break tests using a hand-held dynamometer and the Kin-Com. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1994; 19: 28-31
- 5 Burns SP, Spanier DE. Break-technique handheld dynamom-etry: relation between angular velocity and strength measurement. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005; 86: 1420-1426
- 6 Agabegi SS, Freiberg RA, Plunkett JM et al Thumb abduction strength measurement in carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg [Am] 2007; 32: 859-866
- 7 Bigelow E, Bell M. Carpal tunnel syndrome: a new objective evaluation technique. Can J Plast Surg 1998; 6: 99-103
- 8 Boatright JR, Kiebzak GM, O’Neil DM et al Measurement of thumb abduction strength: normative data and a comparison with grip and pinch strength. J Hand Surg [Am] 1997; 22: 843-848
- 9 Chao EYS, An KN, Cooney WP, Linscheid RL. Hand functional strength assessment and its clinical application. In: Chao EYS, An KN, Cooney WP, Linscheid RL. Biomechanics of the hand. World Scientific, Singapore; 1989: 97-129
- 10 Liu F, Carlson L, Watson HK. Quantitative abductor pollicis brevis strength testing: reliability and normative values. J Hand Surg [Am] 2000; 25: 752-759
- 11 Rozmaryn LM, Bartko JJ, Isler MLD. The ab-adductometer: a new device for measuring the muscle strength and function of the thumb. J Hand Ther 2007; 20: 311-324