Download PDF
Klinische Neurophysiologie 2021; 52(03): 195-211
DOI: 10.1055/a-1416-3874
DGKN-Updates

Evozierte Potenziale – Reminder und Update

Evoked Potentials – Reminder and Update
David Weise
,
Stefan Jun Groiss
,
Florian Klinker
,
Werner H. Mess
,
Volker Milnik
,
Daniel Zeller
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Mit Hilfe der evozierten Potenziale und der magnetisch evozierten motorischen Potenziale können verlängerte Latenzen zentraler Leitungsbahnen und peripherer Nerven nachgewiesen oder ausgeschlossen werden. Somit können Symptome objektiviert und quantifiziert sowie Läsionen lokalisiert werden. In diesem Beitrag werden Durchführung und Indikationen der einzelnen Modalitäten zusammengefasst und Neuerungen berichtet.

Abstract

Evoked potentials (EP, acoustic AEP, somatosensory SEP, visual VEP) and magnetically evoked motor potentials (MEP) provide accurate measurements of latencies in the stimulated pathway. The indication for investigating the functions of central pathways and peripheral nerves is the demonstration or exclusion of prolonged latencies. Thus, symptoms can be objectified and quantified as well as (symptomatic or asymptomatic) lesions localized. In this review, the procedures and indications of the different EP modalities are summarized and novelties reported. The particular importance of EP for the diagnosis and prognosis of multiple sclerosis is further highlighted.

Schlüsselwörter

Evozierte Potenziale - Durchführung - Indikationen - Leitungszeit - multiple Sklerose

Keywords

Evoked potentials - procedure - indications - conduction time - multiple sclerosis


Publication History

Article published online:
13 September 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Stöhr M, Dichgans J, Diener Ch. Evozierte Potentiale–SEP, VEP. AEP. 1. Aufl. Berlin: Springer; 1982
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Lowitzsch K, Maurer K, Hopf HC. Hrsg. Evozierte Potenziale bei Erwachsenen und Kindern. 1. Aufl. Stuttgart: Thieme; 1983
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Buchner H. Hrsg. Praxisbuch–Evozierte Potenziale. Stuttgart: Thieme; 2014
    Article in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Buchner H, Milnik V. SOP Methodik evozierter Potenziale. Klin Neurophysiol 2019; 50: 96-106
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Buchner H, Claßen J, Gobbele R. Evozierte Potenziale–Qualitatssicherung–Neues in der klinischen Anwendung. Klin Neurophysiol 2007; 38: 101-111 doi:10.1055/s-2007-977731
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Bischof C, Buchner H. Hrsg. SOPs Neurophysiologische Diagnostik. Stuttgart: Thieme; 2018
    Article in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Husain AM. Illustrated manual of clinical evoked potentials. New York: Springer; 2018
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Dawson GD. A summation technique for detection of small evoked potentials. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1954; 6: 65-84
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Cruccu G, Aminoff MJ, Curio G. et al. Recommendations for the clinical use of somatosensory-evoked potantials. Clin Neurophysiol 2008; 119: 1705-1719
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Bender A. Kommission Leitlinien der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Neurologie (DGN). S1-Leitlinie „Hypoxisch-ischämische Enzephalopathie (HIE) im Erwachsenenalter“. 2018; Im Internet: https://dgn.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/030119_LL_Hypoxische_Enzephalopathie_2018.pdf (Stand: 22.06.2021)
    PubMed
  • 11 Richtlinie gemäß § 16 Abs. 1 S. 1 Nr. 1 TPG für die Regeln zur Feststellung des Todes nach § 3 Abs. 1 S. 1 Nr. 2 TPG und die Verfahrensregeln zur Feststellung des endgültigen, nicht behebbaren Ausfalls der Gesamtfunktion des Großhirns, des Kleinhirns und des Hirnstamms nach § 3 Abs. 2 Nr. 2 TPG, Vierte Fortschreibung. Dtsch Arztebl 2015; 112 (27–28): A-1256 / B-1052 / C-1024
    PubMed
  • 12 Weise D, Adamidis M, Pizzolato F. et al. Assessment of brainstem function with auricular branch of vagus nerve stimulation in Parkinsonʼs disease. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0120786 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0120786
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Katsarava Z, Ayzenberg I, Sack F. et al. A novel method of eliciting pain-related potentials by transcutaneous electrical stimulation. Headache 2006; 46: 1511-1517 doi:10.1111/j.1526-4610.2006.00446.x
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Hansen H, Obermann M, Uçeyler N. et al. Clinical application of pain-related evoked potentials. Schmerz 2012; 1: 8-15 doi:10.1007/s00482-011-1117-1
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Halliday AM, McDonald WI, Mushin J. Visual evoked response in diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Br Med J 1973; 4: 661-664
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Holder GE, Celesia GG, Miyake Y. et al. International federation of Clinical Neurophysiology: Recommendations for visual system testing. Clin Neurophysiol 2010; 121: 1393-1409
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Zafeiropoulos P, Katsanos A, Kitsos G. et al. The contribution of multifocal visual evoked potentials in patients with optic neuritis and multiple sclerosis: a review. Doc Ophthalmol 2021; 142: 283-292 doi:10.1007/s10633-020-09799-4
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Jewett DL, Romano MN, Williston JS. Human auditory evoked potentials: possible brain stem components detected on the scalp. Science 1970; 167: 1517-1518
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Pratt H, Aminoff M, Nuwer MR. et al. Short-latency auditory evoked potentials. The International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl 1999; 52: 69-77
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Szelényi A, Prell J. Klinische Neurophysiologie im Operationssaal. Klin Neurophysiol 2019; 69: 193-205
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Barker AT, Jalinous R, Freeston IL. Non-invasive magnetic stimulation of human motor cortex. Lancet 1985; 1: 1106-1107 doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(85)92413-4
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Groppa S, Oliviero A, Eisen A. et al. A practical guide to diagnostic transcranial magnetic stimulation: report of an IFCN Committee. Clin Neurophysiol 2012; 123: 858-882
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Chen R, Dros D, Curra A. et al. The clinical diagnostic utility of transcranial magnetic stimulation: report of an IFCN Committee. Clin Neurophysiol 2008; 119: 504-553
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Rossi S, Hallet M, Rossini PM. et al. Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research. Clin Neurophysiol 2009; 120: 2008-2039
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Rossini PM, Burke B, Chen R. et al. Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord, roots and peripheral nerves: basic principles and procedures for routine clinical and research application. An updated report from an I.F.C.N. Committee. Clin Neurophysiol 2015; 126: 1071-1107
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Latorre A, Rocchi L, Berardelli A. et al. The interindividual variability of transcranial magnetic stimulation effects: implications for diagnostic use in movement disorders. Mov Disord 2019; 34: 936-949 doi:10.1002/mds.27736
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Pouget J, Trefouret S, Attarian S. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS): compared sensitivity of different motor response parameters in ALS. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Other Motor Neuron Disord 2000; 1: S45-S49
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Rösler KM. Triple Stimulationstechnik. Siebner H, Ziemann U. Das TMS-Buch. Berlin: Springer; 2007: 119-132
    Google Scholar
  • 29 Lefaucheur JP, Aleman A, Baeken C. et al. Corrigendum to „Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS): An update (2014–2018)“ [Clin. Neurophysiol. 131 (2020) 474–528]. Clin Neurophysiol 2020; 131: 1168-1169 doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2020.02.003
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Nikolov P, Heil V, Hartmann CJ. et al. Motor evoked potentials improve targeting in deep brain stimulation surgery. Neuromodulation 2021 [Online ahead of print]. doi:10.1111/ner.13386
    PubMed
  • 31 Thompson AJ, Banwell BL, Barkhof F. et al. Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria. Lancet Neurol 2018; 17: 162-173 doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30470-2
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Magnano I, Pes GM, Pilurzi G. et al. Exploring brainstem function in multiple sclerosis by combining brainstem reflexes, evoked potentials, clinical and MRI investigations. Clin Neurophysiol 2014; 125: 2286-2296 doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2014.03.016
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Di Maggio G, Santangelo R, Guerrieri S. et al. Optical coherence tomography and visual evoked potentials: Which is more sensitive in multiple sclerosis?. Mult Scler 2014; 20: 1342-1347 doi:10.1177/1352458514524293
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Giffroy X, Maes N, Albert A. et al. Multimodal evoked potentials for functional quantification and prognosis in multiple sclerosis. BMC Neurology 2016; 16: 83 doi:10.1186/s12883-016-0608-1
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Hardmeier M, Leocani L, Fuhr P. A new role for evoked potentials in MS? Repurposing evoked potentials as biomarkers for clinical trials in MS. Mult Scler 2017; 23: 1309-1319 doi:10.1177/1352458517707265
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 London F, El Sankari S, van Pesch V. Early disturbances in multimodal evoked potentials as a prognostic factor for long-term disability in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients. Clin Neurophysiol 2017; 128: 561-569 doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2016.12.029
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Schlaeger R, DʼSouza M, Schindler C. et al. Prediction of MS disability by multimodal evoked potentials: investigation during relapse or in the relapse-free interval?. Clin Neurophys 2014; 125: 1889-1892 doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2013.12.117
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar