Download PDF
Am J Perinatol 2024; 41(S 01): e204-e211
DOI: 10.1055/a-1877-8918
Original Article

Association of Maternal Body Mass Index and Maternal Morbidity And Mortality

Mara J. Dinsmoor 
1   Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology of Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
,
Lynda G. Ugwu
2   George Washington University Biostatistics Center, Washington, District of Columbia
,
Jennifer L. Bailit
3   Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, MetroHealth Medical Center-Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
,
Uma M. Reddy
4   The Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, Maryland
,
Ronald J. Wapner
5   Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University, New York, New York
,
Michael W. Varner 
6   Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, Utah
,
John M. Thorp Jr.
7   Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
,
Steve N. Caritis
8   Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
,
Mona Prasad
9   Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
,
Alan T.N. Tita
10   Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
,
George R. Saade
11   Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas
,
Yoram Sorokin
12   Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan
,
Dwight J. Rouse
13   Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
,
Sean C. Blackwell
14   Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School-Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston, Texas
,
Jorge E. Tolosa
15   Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon
,
for the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units (MFMU) Network* › Author Affiliations Funding The project described was supported by grants from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD; grant numbers: HD21410, HD27869, HD27915, HD27917, HD34116, HD34208, U10 HD36801, HD40500, HD40512, HD40544, HD40545, HD40560, HD40485, HD53097, and HD53118) and the National Center for Research Resources (grant numbers: UL1 RR024989 and 5UL1 RR025764). Comments and views of the authors do not necessarily represent views of the National Institutes of Health.
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective This study aimed to assess the association of maternal body mass index (BMI) with a composite of severe maternal outcomes.

Study Design Secondary analysis of a cohort of deliveries on randomly selected days at 25 hospitals from 2008 to 2011. Data on comorbid conditions, intrapartum events, and postpartum course were collected. The reference group (REF, BMI: 18.5–29.9kg/m2), obese (OB; BMI: 30–39.9kg/m2), morbidly obese (MO; BMI: 40–49.9kg/m2), and super morbidly obese (SMO; BMI ≥ 50kg/m2) women were compared. The composite of severe maternal outcomes was defined as death, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, ventilator use, deep venous thrombosis/pulmonary embolus (DVT/PE), sepsis, hemorrhage, disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), unplanned operative procedure, or stroke. Patients in the REF group were matched 1:1 with those in all other obesity groups based on propensity score using the baseline characteristics of age, race/ethnicity, previous cesarean, preexisting diabetes, chronic hypertension, parity, cigarette use, and insurance status. Multivariable Poisson's regression was used to estimate adjusted relative risks (aRRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between BMI and the composite outcome. Because cesarean delivery may be in the causal pathway between obesity and adverse maternal outcomes, models were then adjusted for mode of delivery to evaluate potential mediation.

Results A total of 52,162 pregnant patients are included in the analysis. Risk of composite maternal outcomes was increased for SMO compared with REF but not for OB and MO [OB: aRR=1.06, 95% CI: 0.99–1.14; MO: aRR=1.10, 95% CI: 0.97–1.25; SMO: aRR=1.32, 95% CI: 1.02–1.70]. However, in the mediation analysis, cesarean appears to mediate 46% (95% CI: 31–50%) of the risk of severe morbidity for SMO compared with REF.

Conclusion Super morbid obesity is significantly associated with increased serious maternal morbidity and mortality; however, cesarean appears to mediate this association. Obesity and morbid obesity are not associated with maternal morbidity and mortality.

Key Points

  • Super morbid obesity is associated with increased morbidity.

  • Cesarean appears to mediate the association between super morbid obesity and morbidity.

  • Obesity and morbid maternal obesity are not associated with morbidity.

Keywords

obesity - maternal morbidity - cesarean delivery - propensity score analysis

Note

Presented in part at the 38th annual meeting of the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, January 29–February 3, 2018, Dallas, TX.


Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 12 July 2021

Accepted: 02 June 2022

Accepted Manuscript online:
16 June 2022

Article published online:
02 September 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 May AL, Freedman D, Sherry B, Blanck HM. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Obesity - United States, 1999-2010. MMWR Suppl 2013; 62 (03) 120-128
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Freedman DS. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Obesity - United States, 1988-2008. MMWR Suppl 2011; 60 (01) 73-77
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Kit BK, Flegal KM. Prevalence of childhood and adult obesity in the United States, 2011-2012. JAMA 2014; 311 (08) 806-814
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Kit BK, Ogden CL. Prevalence of obesity and trends in the distribution of body mass index among US adults, 1999-2010. JAMA 2012; 307 (05) 491-497
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 WHO.. BMI Data. Accessed February 19, 2019 at: https://www.who.int/data/gho/data/themes/topics/topic-details/GHO/body-mass-index
    PubMed
  • 6 Palmer MK, Toth PP. Trends in lipids, obesity, metabolic syndrome, and diabetes mellitus in the United States: An NHANES analysis (2003–2004 to 2013–2014). Obesity (Silver Spring) 2019; 27 (02) 309-314
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJK, Driscoll AK. Births: final data for 2018. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2019; 68 (13) 1-47
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Singh GK, DiBari JN. Marked disparities in pre-pregnancy obesity and overweight prevalence among US women by race/ethnicity, nativity/immigrant status, and sociodemographic characteristics, 2012–2014. J Obes 2019; 2019: 241-263
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 March of Dimes. Obesity among women of childbearing age: United States, 2010-2020. . Accessed August 1, 2020 at: https://www.marchofdimes.org/peristats/data?top=17&lev=1&stop=350&reg=99&obj=1&slev=1
    PubMed
  • 10 Downs DS. Obesity in special populations. Prim Care 2016; 43 (01) 109-120
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Weiss JL, Malone FD, Emig D. et al; FASTER Research Consortium. Obesity, obstetric complications and cesarean delivery rate–a population-based screening study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 190 (04) 1091-1097
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Lim CC, Mahmood T. Obesity in pregnancy. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2015; 29 (03) 309-319
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Wolfe KB, Rossi RA, Warshak CR. The effect of maternal obesity on the rate of failed induction of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 205 (02) 128.e1-128.e7
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Marchi J, Berg M, Dencker A, Olander EK, Begley C. Risks associated with obesity in pregnancy, for the mother and baby: a systematic review of reviews. Obes Rev 2015; 16 (08) 621-638
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Mission JF, Marshall NE, Caughey AB. Obesity in pregnancy: a big problem and getting bigger. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2013; 68 (05) 389-399
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Sebire NJ, Jolly M, Harris JP. et al. Maternal obesity and pregnancy outcome: a study of 287,213 pregnancies in London. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2001; 25 (08) 1175-1182
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Lashen H, Fear K, Sturdee DW. Obesity is associated with increased risk of first trimester and recurrent miscarriage: matched case-control study. Hum Reprod 2004; 19 (07) 1644-1646
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Torloni MR, Betrán AP, Horta BL. et al. Prepregnancy BMI and the risk of gestational diabetes: a systematic review of the literature with meta-analysis. Obes Rev 2009; 10 (02) 194-203
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Stothard KJ, Tennant PWG, Bell R, Rankin J. Maternal overweight and obesity and the risk of congenital anomalies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 2009; 301 (06) 636-650
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Korkmaz L, Baştuğ O, Kurtoğlu S. Maternal obesity and its short- and long-term maternal and infantile effects. J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol 2016; 8 (02) 114-124
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Fyfe EM, Anderson NH, North RA. et al; Screening for Pregnancy Endpoints (SCOPE) Consortium. Risk of first-stage and second-stage cesarean delivery by maternal body mass index among nulliparous women in labor at term. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 117 (06) 1315-1322
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Kim T, Burn SC, Bangdiwala A, Pace S, Rauk P. Neonatal morbidity and maternal complication rates in women with a delivery body mass index of 60 or higher. Obstet Gynecol 2017; 130 (05) 988-993
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Bailit JL, Grobman WA, Rice MM. et al; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal–Fetal Medicine Units Network. Risk-adjusted models for adverse obstetric outcomes and variation in risk-adjusted outcomes across hospitals. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 209 (05) 446.e1-446.e30
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Grobman WA, Bailit JL, Rice MM. et al; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Can differences in obstetric outcomes be explained by differences in the care provided? The MFMU Network APEX study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 211 (02) 147.e1-147.e16
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Marshall NE, Guild C, Cheng YW, Caughey AB, Halloran DR. Maternal superobesity and perinatal outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 206 (05) 417.e1-417.e6
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Mantakas A, Farrell T. The influence of increasing BMI in nulliparous women on pregnancy outcome. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2010; 153 (01) 43-46
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Leonard SA, Main EK, Carmichael SL. The contribution of maternal characteristics and cesarean delivery to an increasing trend of severe maternal morbidity. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2019; 19 (01) 16-24
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Klenov VE, Jungheim ES. Obesity and reproductive function: a review of the evidence. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2014; 26 (06) 455-460
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar