Download PDF
Am J Perinatol 2024; 41(S 01): e1479-e1485
DOI: 10.1055/a-2051-4047
Original Article

Perinatal Outcome following the Suspension of Intrapartum Oxygen Treatment

Yossi Bart 
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel
,
Raanan Meyer 
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel
,
Orit Moran
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel
,
Abraham Tsur 
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel
,
Eran Kassif
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel
,
Aya Mohr-Sasson
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel
,
Emily Hamilton
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel
,
Eyal Sivan
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel
,
Yoav Yinon
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel
,
Shali Mazaki-Tovi
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel
,
Rakefet Yoeli
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel
› Author Affiliations Funding None.
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective This study aimed to evaluate whether the suspension of intrapartum maternal oxygen supplementation for nonreassuring fetal heart rate is associated with adverse perinatal outcomes.

Study Design A retrospective cohort study, including all individuals that underwent labor in a single tertiary medical center. On April 16, 2020, the routine use of intrapartum oxygen for category II and III fetal heart rate tracings was suspended. The study group included individuals with singleton pregnancies that underwent labor during the 7 months between April 16, 2020, and November 14, 2020. The control group included individuals that underwent labor during the 7 months before April 16, 2020. Exclusion criteria included elective cesarean section, multifetal pregnancy, fetal death, and maternal oxygen saturation <95% during delivery. The primary outcome was defined as the rate of composite neonatal outcome, consisting of arterial cord pH <7.1, mechanical ventilation, respiratory distress syndrome, necrotizing enterocolitis, intraventricular hemorrhage grade 3/4, and neonatal death. The secondary outcome was the rate of cesarean and operative delivery.

Results The study group included 4,932 individuals, compared with 4,906 individuals in the control group. The suspension of intrapartum oxygen treatment was associated with a significant increase in the rate of composite neonatal outcome (187 [3.8%] vs. 120 [2.4%], p < 0.001), including the rate of abnormal cord arterial pH <7.1 (119 [2.4%] vs. 56 [1.1%], p < 0.01). A higher rate of cesarean section due to nonreassuring fetal heart rate was noted in the study group (320 [6.5%] vs. 268 [5.5%], p = 0.03).

A logistic regression analysis revealed that the suspension of intrapartum oxygen treatment was independently associated with the composite neonatal outcome (adjusted odds ratio = 1.55 [95% confidence interval, 1.23–1.96]) while adjusting for suspected chorioamnionitis, intrauterine growth restriction, and recent coronavirus disease 2019 exposure.

Conclusion Suspension of intrapartum oxygen treatment for nonreassuring fetal heart rate was associated with higher rates of adverse neonatal outcomes and urgent cesarean section due to fetal heart rate.

Key Points

  • The available data on intrapartum maternal oxygen supplementation are equivocal.

  • Suspension of maternal oxygen for nonreassuring fetal heart rate during labor was associated with adverse neonatal outcomes.

  • Oxygen treatment might still be important and relevant during labor.

Keywords

oxygen - fetal heart rate - pH - cesarean section

Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 06 November 2022

Accepted: 06 March 2023

Accepted Manuscript online:
09 March 2023

Article published online:
17 April 2023

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Althabe Jr. O, Schwarcz RL, Pose SV, Escarcena L, Caldeyro-Barcia R. Effects on fetal heart rate and fetal pO2 of oxygen administration to the mother. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1967; 98 (06) 858-870
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Haydon ML, Gorenberg DM, Nageotte MP. et al. The effect of maternal oxygen administration on fetal pulse oximetry during labor in fetuses with nonreassuring fetal heart rate patterns. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 195 (03) 735-738
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Simpson KR, James DC. Efficacy of intrauterine resuscitation techniques in improving fetal oxygen status during labor. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 105 (06) 1362-1368
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Simpson KR. Intrauterine resuscitation during labor: review of current methods and supportive evidence. J Midwifery Womens Health 2007; 52 (03) 229-237
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Reddy UM, Weiner SJ, Saade GR. et al; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units (MFMU) Network. Intrapartum resuscitation interventions for category II fetal heart rate tracings and improvement to category I. Obstet Gynecol 2021; 138 (03) 409-416
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Qian G, Xu X, Chen L. et al. The effect of maternal low flow oxygen administration during the second stage of labour on umbilical cord artery pH: a randomised controlled trial. BJOG 2017; 124 (04) 678-685
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Fawole B, Hofmeyr GJ. Maternal oxygen administration for fetal distress. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 12 (12) CD000136
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Raghuraman N, Wan L, Temming LA. et al. Effect of oxygen vs room air on intrauterine fetal resuscitation: a randomized noninferiority clinical trial. JAMA Pediatr 2018; 172 (09) 818-823
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Burd J, Quist-Nelson J, Moors S, Raghuraman N, Aly H, Berghella V. Effect of intrapartum oxygen on the rate of cesarean delivery: a meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM 2021; 3 (04) 100374
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Thorp JA, Trobough T, Evans R, Hedrick J, Yeast JD. The effect of maternal oxygen administration during the second stage of labor on umbilical cord blood gas values: a randomized controlled prospective trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 172 (2 pt 1): 465-474
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Nesterenko TH, Acun C, Mohamed MA. et al. Is it a safe practice to administer oxygen during uncomplicated delivery: a randomized controlled trial?. Early Hum Dev 2012; 88 (08) 677-681
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Research Planning Workshop. Electronic fetal heart rate monitoring: research guidelines for interpretation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 177 (06) 1385-1390
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Moors S, Bullens LM, van Runnard Heimel PJ. et al. The effect of intrauterine resuscitation by maternal hyperoxygenation on perinatal and maternal outcome: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM 2020; 2 (02) 100102
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Burd JE, Anderson K, Berghella V, Duncan DG, Baxter JK, Quist-Nelson J. Evaluation of an initiative to decrease the use of oxygen supplementation for category II fetal heart rate tracings. Obstet Gynecol 2021; 138 (04) 627-632
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Ankumah NE, Blackwell SC, Alrais MA. et al. Liberal versus indicated maternal oxygen supplementation in labor: a before-and-after trial. Am J Perinatol 2018; 35 (11) 1057-1064
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Hamel MS, Hughes BL, Rouse DJ. Whither oxygen for intrauterine resuscitation?. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 212 (04) 461-462, 461.e1
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Raghuraman N, López JD, Carter EB. et al. The effect of intrapartum oxygen supplementation on category II fetal monitoring. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2020; 223 (06) 905.e1-905.e7
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Fellman V, Raivio KO. Reperfusion injury as the mechanism of brain damage after perinatal asphyxia. Pediatr Res 1997; 41 (05) 599-606
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Raghuraman N, Temming LA, Stout MJ, Macones GA, Cahill AG, Tuuli MG. Intrauterine hyperoxemia and risk of neonatal morbidity. Obstet Gynecol 2017; 129 (04) 676-682
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Davis PG, Tan A, O'Donnell CP, Schulze A. Resuscitation of newborn infants with 100% oxygen or air: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 2004; 364 (9442): 1329-1333
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Tan A, Schulze A, O'Donnell CP, Davis PG. Air versus oxygen for resuscitation of infants at birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005; 2005 (02) CD002273
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Vento M, Asensi M, Sastre J, García-Sala F, Pallardó FV, Viña J. Resuscitation with room air instead of 100% oxygen prevents oxidative stress in moderately asphyxiated term neonates. Pediatrics 2001; 107 (04) 642-647
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Vento M, Asensi M, Sastre J, Lloret A, García-Sala F, Viña J. Oxidative stress in asphyxiated term infants resuscitated with 100% oxygen. J Pediatr 2003; 142 (03) 240-246
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Sola A, Saldeño YP, Favareto V. Clinical practices in neonatal oxygenation: where have we failed? What can we do?. J Perinatol 2008; 28 (suppl 1): S28-S34
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Khaw KS, Wang CC, Ngan Kee WD, Pang CP, Rogers MS. Effects of high inspired oxygen fraction during elective caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia on maternal and fetal oxygenation and lipid peroxidation. Br J Anaesth 2002; 88 (01) 18-23
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Watkins VY, Martin S, Macones GA, Tuuli MG, Cahill AG, Raghuraman N. The duration of intrapartum supplemental oxygen administration and umbilical cord oxygen content. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2020; 223 (03) 440.e1-440.e7
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 McHugh A, El-Khuffash A, Bussmann N, Doherty A, Franklin O, Breathnach F. Hyperoxygenation in pregnancy exerts a more profound effect on cardiovascular hemodynamics than is observed in the nonpregnant state. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2019; 220 (04) 397.e1-397.e8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Simpson KR. Intrauterine resuscitation during labor: should maternal oxygen administration be a first-line measure?. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2008; 13 (06) 362-367
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Garite TJ, Nageotte MP, Parer JT. Should we really avoid giving oxygen to mothers with concerning fetal heart rate patterns?. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 212 (04) 459-460, 459.e1
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Hamel MS, Anderson BL, Rouse DJ. Oxygen for intrauterine resuscitation: of unproved benefit and potentially harmful. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 211 (02) 124-127
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Practice bulletin no. 116: Management of intrapartum fetal heart rate tracings. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 116 (05) 1232-1240
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Grobman WA, Rice MM, Reddy UM. et al; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal–Fetal Medicine Units Network. Labor induction versus expectant management in low-risk nulliparous women. N Engl J Med 2018; 379 (06) 513-523
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar