The Feasibility and Impact of a Postresuscitation Care Protocol in the Well Baby Nursery

Abstract

Objective The objective of this study is to determine if a postresuscitation care (PRC) protocol in the well baby nursery (WBN) would improve identification of infants requiring neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission.

Study Design This is a retrospective and prospective cohort study of a PRC protocol in 765 WBN admissions after delivery room (DR) resuscitation with continuous positive airway pressure and/or positive pressure ventilation.

Results After protocol initiation, NICU transfers during the birth hospitalization increased significantly (11.17 vs. 16.08%, p < 0.05). There was no difference in incidence of NICU transfer (5.99 vs. 7.29%, pre-PRC vs. PRC, p = 0.47) during the first 4 hours of life during protocol administration. Respiratory distress was the most common indication for NICU transfer in both cohorts (7.90 vs. 11.81%, p = 0.09, pre-PRC vs. PRC). Noninvasive positive pressure and/or high-flow nasal cannula (5.72 vs. 9.55%, p = 0.06, pre-PRC vs. PRC) were routinely administered in the NICU to transferred infants.

Conclusion After apparent recovery from DR resuscitation, WBN admissions experience significant risk of complications requiring NICU transfer, supporting Neonatal Resuscitation Program recommendation for enhanced monitoring. In our study, we demonstrated the feasibility of standardized PRC protocol in the WBN. NICU transfers increased after initiation of a PRC protocol; however, further studies are needed to confirm possible benefits of this PRC protocol in improving identification of infants requiring a higher level of care.

Key Points

• A PRC protocol in WBN is feasible and associated with increased NICU transfer.

• Despite initial apparent recovery, delayed presentation of respiratory distress is a frequent morbidity.

• Increased surveillance as recommended by Neonatal Resuscitation Program is indicated in this population.

Keywords

resuscitation - postresuscitation care - complications - term neonate - late preterm neonate - continuous positive airway pressure - positive pressure ventilation

Publication History

Received: 04 November 2022

Accepted: 30 March 2023

Accepted Manuscript online:
04 April 2023

Article published online:
11 May 2023

• References

• 1 Rich WD, Leone T, Finer NN. Delivery room intervention: improving the outcome. Clin Perinatol 2010; 37 (01) 189-202
• 2 Stocks EF, Jaleel M, Smithhart W. et al. Decreasing delivery room CPAP-associated pneumothorax at ≥35-week gestational age. J Perinatol 2022; 42 (06) 761-768
• 3 Hishikawa K, Goishi K, Fujiwara T, Kaneshige M, Ito Y, Sago H. Pulmonary air leak associated with CPAP at term birth resuscitation. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2015; 100 (05) F382-F387
• 4 Weiner GM. Textbook of Neonatal Resuscitation. Vol. 8. Itasca, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics; 2021
• 5 Zahouani T, Hlaing AY, Karbalivand H, Hernandez JG, Rajegowda B. Low risk infants clinically monitored in well newborn nursery who later required transfer to NICU for further care. Fetal Neonatal Dev Med 2017;
• 6 Spillane NT, Chivily C, Andrews T. Short term outcomes in term and late preterm neonates admitted to the well-baby nursery after resuscitation in the delivery room. J Perinatol 2019; 39 (07) 983-989
• 7 Poets CF, Rüdiger M. Mask CPAP during neonatal transition: too much of a good thing for some term infants?. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2015; 100 (05) F378-F379
• 8 Frazier MD, Werthammer J. Post-resuscitation complications in term neonates. J Perinatol 2007; 27 (02) 82-84
• 9 Claassen CC, Strand ML. Understanding the risks and benefits of delivery room CPAP for term infants. Pediatrics 2019; 144 (03) e20191720
• 10 Osterman M, Hamilton B, Martin J, Driscoll A, Births CV. Final Data for 2020. National Center for Health Statistics (U.S.). 2021 Accessed September 21, 2022 at: https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/112078
• 11 Braun D, Braun E, Chiu V. et al. Trends in neonatal intensive care unit utilization in a large integrated health care system. JAMA Netw Open 2020; 3 (06) e205239
• 12 Vermont Oxford Network Manual of Operation: Part 2, Release 19.0. Burlington, VT: Vermont Oxford Network; 2014
• 13 Stroustrup A, Trasande L, Holzman IR. Randomized controlled trial of restrictive fluid management in transient tachypnea of the newborn. J Pediatr 2012; 160 (01) 38-43.e1
• 14 Fenton TR, Kim JH. A systematic review and meta-analysis to revise the Fenton growth chart for preterm infants. BMC Pediatr 2013; 13: 59
• 15 Akinloye O, O'Connell C, Allen AC, El-Naggar W. Post-resuscitation care for neonates receiving positive pressure ventilation at birth. Pediatrics 2014; 134 (04) e1057-1062
• 16 Shah BA, Fabres JG, Leone TA, Schmölzer GM, Szyld EG. International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation Neonatal Life Support Task Force. Continuous positive airway pressure for term and ≥34⁺⁰ weeks' gestation newborns at birth: a systematic review. Resusc Plus 2022; 12: 100320
• 17 Smithhart W, Wyckoff MH, Kapadia V. et al. Delivery room continuous positive airway pressure and pneumothorax. Pediatrics 2019; 144 (03) e20190756
• 18 Spillane NT, Macalintal F, Nyirenda T, Golombek SG. What happens to 35 week infants that receive delivery room continuous positive airway pressure?. J Perinatol 2021; 41 (07) 1575-1582
• 19 Haidari ES, Lee HC, Illuzzi JL, Phibbs CS, Lin H, Xu X. Hospital variation in admissions to neonatal intensive care units by diagnosis severity and category. J Perinatol 2021; 41 (03) 468-477
• 20 Ringer SA, Aziz K. Neonatal stabilization and postresuscitation care. Clin Perinatol 2012; 39 (04) 901-918
• 21 Chiriboga N, Cortez J, Pena-Ariet A. et al. Successful implementation of an intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) bundle in reducing severe ICH: a quality improvement project. J Perinatol 2019; 39 (01) 143-151
• 22 Grossman MR, Berkwitt AK, Osborn RR. et al. An Initiative to improve the quality of care of infants with neonatal abstinence syndrome. Pediatrics 2017; 139 (06) e20163360