Download PDF
J Neurol Surg B Skull Base
DOI: 10.1055/a-2158-6037
Original Article

Endoscopic Multiportal Approaches to Meckel's Cave: A Cadaveric Study and a Three-Dimensional Anatomical Video

Eman H. Salem 
1   Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
2   Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Wexner Medical Center, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States
,
Ahmed Musaad Abd El-Fattah
1   Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
,
Hisham Atef Ebada
1   Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
,
Kyle van Koevering
2   Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Wexner Medical Center, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States
,
Douglas A. Hardesty
3   Department of Neurosurgery, Wexner Medical Center, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States
,
Daniel M. Prevedello
2   Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Wexner Medical Center, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States
3   Department of Neurosurgery, Wexner Medical Center, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States
,
Mohamed Abd El-halem Al-Saddeik
1   Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
,
Ricardo L. Carrau
2   Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Wexner Medical Center, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States
3   Department of Neurosurgery, Wexner Medical Center, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective This cadaveric study aims to illustrate the lateral transorbital (LTO), transantral transpterygoid (TATP), and endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEA) to Meckel's cave (MC), defining their surgical freedom, area of exposure, and advantages and limitations; thus, refining their respective indications.

Design Cadaveric study.

Setting The Anatomical Laboratory for Visuospatial Innovations in Otolaryngology and Neurosurgery (ALT-VISION) at the Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center.

Participants Bilateral dissections of five injected cadavers (10 sides).

Main Outcome Measures Distance to targets, surgical freedom, and area of exposure provided by the EEA, TATP, and LTO approaches.

Results The TATP approach provides superior surgical freedom to foramen rotundum (167.70 ± 29.762 mm). However, surgical freedom to foramen ovale was best when using the LTO approach (75.01 ± 15.773 mm). The EEA provides a superior exposure of the medial MC (mean area of 587.69 ± 38.59 mm2). The LTO and TATP approaches provide equivalent access to the lateral MC (ranging from 468.90 ± 26.98 mm2 for TATP to 650.11 ± 35.76 mm2 for the LTO approach). Combining approaches increases the area of exposure significantly (1,237.79 ± 48.41 mm2 and 1,056.59 ± 48.12 mm2 for EEA and LTO vs. EEA and TATP).

Conclusion This study thoroughly emphasizes the pros and cons of the aforementioned approaches. Each approach may be applied in selected cases as a single or as part of a combined technique. However, conventional approaches are still indicated according to extent and pathology.

Level of Evidence: V.

Keywords

Meckel's cave - transorbital - transpterygoid - endoscopic endonasal - multiportal

Author's Contributions

Eman H. Salem: original conception, study design, data collection and interpretation, manuscript drafting and critical review, final approval, agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work; Hisham Atef Ebada, Ahmed Musaad Abd El-Fattah, Mohamed Abd El-halem Al-Saddeik: manuscript drafting and critical review, final approval, agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work; Kyle van Koevering, Douglas A. Hardesty, Daniel M. Prevedello, and Ricardo L. Carrau: study design, supervision on cadaveric study, final approval, manuscript drafting and critical review, and agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work.




Publication History

Received: 14 April 2023

Accepted: 17 August 2023

Accepted Manuscript online:
22 August 2023

Article published online:
25 September 2023

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 Dolci RLL, Ditzel Filho LFS, Goulart CR. et al. Anatomical nuances of the internal carotid artery in relation to the quadrangular space. J Neurosurg 2018; 128 (01) 174-181
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Suero Molina E, Revuelta Barbero JM, Ewelt C, Stummer W, Carrau RL, Prevedello DM. Access to Meckel's cave for biopsies of indeterminate lesions: a systematic review. Neurosurg Rev 2021; 44 (01) 249-259
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Van Rompaey J, Suruliraj A, Carrau R, Panizza B, Solares CA. Meckel's cave access: anatomic study comparing the endoscopic transantral and endonasal approaches. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2014; 271 (04) 787-794
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Cárdenas Ruiz-Valdepeñas E, Simal Julián JA, Pérez Prat G. et al. The quadrangular space, endonasal access to the meckel cave: technical considerations and clinical series. World Neurosurg 2022; 163: e124-e136
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Locatelli D, Pozzi F, Turri-Zanoni M. et al. Transorbital endoscopic approaches to the skull base: current concepts and future perspectives. J Neurosurg Sci 2016; 60 (04) 514-525
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Truong HQ, Sun X, Celtikci E. et al. Endoscopic anterior transmaxillary “transalisphenoid” approach to Meckel's cave and the middle cranial fossa: an anatomical study and clinical application. J Neurosurg 2018; 130 (01) 227-237
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Kassam AB, Prevedello DM, Carrau RL. et al. The front door to meckel's cave: an anteromedial corridor via expanded endoscopic endonasal approach- technical considerations and clinical series. Neurosurgery 2009; 64 (03) ons71-ons82 , discussion ons82–ons83
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Dallan I, Castelnuovo P, Locatelli D. et al. Multiportal combined transorbital transnasal endoscopic approach for the management of selected skull base lesions: preliminary experience. World Neurosurg 2015; 84 (01) 97-107
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Komatsu F, Komatsu M, Inoue T, Tschabitscher M. Endoscopic supraorbital extradural approach to the cavernous sinus: a cadaver study. J Neurosurg 2011; 114 (05) 1331-1337
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Zoli M, Ratti S, Guaraldi F. et al. Endoscopic endonasal approach to primitive Meckel's cave tumors: a clinical series. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2018; 160 (12) 2349-2361
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Zanation AM, Snyderman CH, Carrau RL, Gardner PA, Prevedello DM, Kassam AB. Endoscopic endonasal surgery for petrous apex lesions. Laryngoscope 2009; 119 (01) 19-25
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Beer-Furlan A, Gomes MQT, Santo MPE, Dias PS, Casarolli C, Teixeira MJ. The evolution of endoscopic approaches to the lateral cavernous sinus. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2015; 76 (02) 163-164
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Agosti E, Alexander AY, Choby G, Peris-Celda M, Pinheiro-Neto CD. Combined endoscopic endonasal transpterygoid and sublabial transmaxillary approaches for a large infratemporal fossa trigeminal schwannoma. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2022; 164 (09) 2525-2531
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Yağmurlu K, Mooney MA, Almefty KK. et al. An alternative endoscopic anterolateral route to Meckel's cave: an anatomic feasibility study using a sublabial transmaxillary approach. World Neurosurg 2018; 114: 134-141
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Di Somma A, Andaluz N, Cavallo LM. et al. Endoscopic transorbital route to the petrous apex: a feasibility anatomic study. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2018; 160 (04) 707-720
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Snyderman C, Gardner P. Master Techniques in Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery: Skull Base Surgery. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2014
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Lima LR, Beer-Furlan A, Prevedello DM. et al. Minimally invasive approaches to the lateral cavernous sinus and Meckel's cave: comparison of transorbital and subtemporal endoscopic techniques. World Neurosurg 2020; 141: e86-e96
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Noiphithak R, Yanez-Siller JC, Revuelta Barbero JM. et al. Comparative analysis of the exposure and surgical freedom of the endoscopic extended minipterional craniotomy and the transorbital endoscopic approach to the anterior and middle cranial fossae. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 2019; 17 (02) 174-181
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Noiphithak R, Yanez-Siller JC, Revuelta Barbero JM, Otto BA, Carrau RL, Prevedello DM. Quantitative analysis of the surgical exposure and surgical freedom between transcranial and transorbital endoscopic anterior petrosectomies to the posterior fossa. J Neurosurg 2018; 131 (02) 569-577
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Priddy BH, Nunes CF, Beer-Furlan A, Carrau R, Dallan I, Prevedello DM. A side door to Meckel's cave: anatomic feasibility study for the lateral transorbital approach. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 2017; 13 (05) 614-621
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Di Somma A, Langdon C, de Notaris M. et al. Combined and simultaneous endoscopic endonasal and transorbital surgery for a Meckel's cave schwannoma: technical nuances of a mini-invasive, multiportal approach. J Neurosurg 2020; 134 (06) 1836-1845
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Dolenc VV. Frontotemporal epidural approach to trigeminal neurinomas. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1994; 130 (1–4): 55-65
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Kawase T, Toya S, Shiobara R, Mine T. Transpetrosal approach for aneurysms of the lower basilar artery. J Neurosurg 1985; 63 (06) 857-861
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Tripathi M, Deo RC, Suri A. et al. Quantitative analysis of the Kawase versus the modified Dolenc-Kawase approach for middle cranial fossa lesions with variable anteroposterior extension. J Neurosurg 2015; 123 (01) 14-22
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Cushing H. Tumors of the Nervus Acusticus and the Syndrome of the Cerebellopontile Angle. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 1917
    Google Scholar
  • 26 Cheung SW, Jackler RK, Pitts LH, Gutin PH. Interconnecting the posterior and middle cranial fossae for tumors that traverse Meckel's cave. Am J Otol 1995; 16 (02) 200-208
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Chanda A, Nanda A. Partial labyrinthectomy petrous apicectomy approach to the petroclival region: an anatomic and technical study. Neurosurgery 2002; 51 (01) 147-159 , discussion 159–160
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Jeon C, Hong CK, Woo KI. et al. Endoscopic transorbital surgery for Meckel's cave and middle cranial fossa tumors: surgical technique and early results. J Neurosurg 2018; 131 (04) 1-10
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Saraceno G, Agosti E, Qiu J. et al. Quantitative anatomical comparison of anterior, anterolateral and lateral, microsurgical and endoscopic approaches to the middle cranial fossa. World Neurosurg 2020; 134: e682-e730
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Hardesty DA, Montaser AS, Carrau RL, Prevedello DM. Limits of endoscopic endonasal transpterygoid approach to cavernous sinus and Meckel's cave. J Neurosurg Sci 2018; 62 (03) 332-338
    PubMedGoogle Scholar