Download PDF
Facial Plast Surg 2024; 40(05): 623-627
DOI: 10.1055/a-2218-6984
Original Research

Effectiveness of ChatGPT in Identifying and Accurately Guiding Patients in Rhinoplasty Complications

Germán A. Soto-Galindo
1   International Fellow of the European Academy of Facial Plastic Surgery, Ege University, Izmir, Türkiye
,
Marta Capelleras
2   Clinical Fellow of the European Academy of Facial Plastic Surgery, Ege University, Izmir, Türkiye
,
Marc Cruellas
3   Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery Resident, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Hospital Universtari de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain
,
Fazil Apaydin
4   Division of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Ege University, Izmir, Türkiye
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Postoperative complications in rhinoplasty require prompt intervention for optimal outcomes. ChatGPT, an artificial intelligence (AI) tool, offers potential for assisting in postoperative care.

This study aims to assess ChatGPT's effectiveness in providing guidance for various rhinoplasty complications.

Different complication scenarios were input into ChatGPT. Responses were categorized into “Contact Surgeon” or “Follow Postoperative Instructions.”

ChatGPT consistently advised immediate surgeon contact for infection. For other complications, it recommended monitoring and adhering to instructions while suggesting surgeon contact if concerns persisted.

ChatGPT shows promise in aiding patients' postoperative care by accurately identifying cases necessitating communication with surgeons or emergency care. This research underscores AI's potential in enhancing patient-centered care and contributes to the evolving landscape of health care practices.

Keywords

artificial intelligence - rhinoplasty - complication - ChatGPT

Author Contributions

G.A.S-G. contributed to conception of the study, acquisition and analysis of data, interpretation of data, draft revision, and final approval of the manuscript. M.Ca. and M.Cr. contributed to the conception and design of the study, analysis of data, draft revision, and final approval of the manuscript. F.A. contributed to the analysis of data, draft revision, and final approval of the manuscript.




Publication History

Accepted Manuscript online:
28 November 2023

Article published online:
27 December 2023

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Eytan DF, Wang TD. Complications in rhinoplasty. Clin Plast Surg 2022; 49 (01) 179-189
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Ayers JW, Poliak A, Dredze M. et al. Comparing physician and artificial intelligence chatbot responses to patient questions posted to a public social media forum. JAMA Intern Med 2023; 183 (06) 589-596
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Apaydin F, Akyildiz S, Hecht DA, Toriumi DM. Rhinobase: a comprehensive database, facial analysis, and picture-archiving software for rhinoplasty. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2009; 11 (03) 209-211
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Hamilton III GS. Dorsal failures: from saddle deformity to pollybeak. Facial Plast Surg 2018; 34 (03) 261-269
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Bhangoo KS. Aesthetic rhinoplasty: avoiding unfavourable results. Indian J Plast Surg 2013; 46 (02) 349-358
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Surowitz JB, Most SP. Complications of rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2013; 21 (04) 639-651
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Erol O, Buyuklu F, Koycu A, Jafarov S, Gultekin G, Erbek SS. Comparison of rapid absorbable sutures with nonabsorbable sutures in closing transcolumellar incision in septorhinoplasty: short-term outcomes. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2020; 44 (05) 1759-1765
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Ihvan O, Seneldir L, Naiboglu B, Verim A, Cetiner S. Comparative columellar scar analysis between w incisions and inverted-v incision in open technique nasal surgery. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2018; 70 (02) 231-234
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Aksu I, Alim H, Tellioğlu AT. Comparative columellar scar analysis between transverse and inverted-V incision in open rhinoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2008; 32 (04) 638-640
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Foda HMT. External rhinoplasty for the Arabian nose: a columellar scar analysis. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2004; 28 (05) 312-316
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Toriumi DM, Kowalczyk DM, Cristel RT. et al. Evaluation of postoperative infection rates in 3084 rhinoplasty cases using antibiotic soaks and/or irrigations. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med 2021; 23 (05) 368-374
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Tran KN, Jang YJ. Incidence and predisposing factors of postoperative infection after rhinoplasty: a single surgeon's 16-year experience with 2630 cases in an east asian population. Plast Reconstr Surg 2022; 150 (01) 51e-59e
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Apaydin F. Nasal valve surgery. Facial Plast Surg 2011; 27 (02) 179-191
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Yeung A, Hassouneh B, Kim DW. Outcome of nasal valve obstruction after functional and aesthetic-functional rhinoplasty. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2016; 18 (02) 128-134
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Joe SA. The assessment and treatment of nasal obstruction after rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2004; 12 (04) 451-458 , vi–vii
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Letzel J, Darbinjan A, Hummel T. The nasal cycle before and after nasal septoplasty. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2022; 279 (10) 4961-4968
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Topal K, Kars A, Atalay F, Kılıc K. Evaluation of effect of septoplasty on nasal mucosal dryness using intranasal Schirmer test. Acta Otolaryngol 2022; 142 (06) 520-523
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Xie Y, Seth I, Hunter-Smith DJ, Rozen WM, Ross R, Lee M. Aesthetic surgery advice and counseling from artificial intelligence: a rhinoplasty consultation with ChatGPT. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2023; 47 (05) 1985-1993
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Buzzaccarini G, Degliuomini RS, Borin M. The artificial intelligence application in aesthetic medicine: how ChatGPT can revolutionize the aesthetic world. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2023; 47 (05) 2211-2212
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar