Synlett 2024; 35(09): 1047-1051
DOI: 10.1055/a-2219-6907
cluster
Chemical Synthesis and Catalysis in Germany

Visible-Light-Mediated Selective Allylic C–H Oxygenation of Cycloalkenes

Tabea Rohlfs
a   University of Münster, Organic Chemistry Institute, Corrensstraße 36/40, 48149 Münster, Germany
,
Leon Gerken
a   University of Münster, Organic Chemistry Institute, Corrensstraße 36/40, 48149 Münster, Germany
,
Jose L. Nova-Fernández
b   Organic Chemistry Department (Módulo 1), Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain
,
Sara Malagón
a   University of Münster, Organic Chemistry Institute, Corrensstraße 36/40, 48149 Münster, Germany
,
Mustafa Uygur
a   University of Münster, Organic Chemistry Institute, Corrensstraße 36/40, 48149 Münster, Germany
,
Silvia Cabrera
c   Inorganic Chemistry Department (Módulo 7), Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain
d   Institute for Advanced Research in Chemical Sciences (IAdChem), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain
,
José Alemán
b   Organic Chemistry Department (Módulo 1), Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain
d   Institute for Advanced Research in Chemical Sciences (IAdChem), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain
,
Olga García Mancheño
a   University of Münster, Organic Chemistry Institute, Corrensstraße 36/40, 48149 Münster, Germany
› Author Affiliations
This work was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) within the projects GA 1594/6-2, GA 1594/7-1, and GRK 2678–437785492, and the DFG is gratefully acknowledged for this generous support. This work was also supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (project PID2021-122299NB-I00, TED2021-130470B-I00, TED2021-129999B-C32), the Comunidad de Madrid for European Structural Funds (S2018/NMT-4367) and proyectos sinérgicos I+D (Y2020/NMT-6469). We want to thank the ERASMUS+ and the ERASMUS program for enabling T.R. to do a research stay at U.A.M. and S.M. to conduct Master’s thesis work at the University of Münster, respectively. T.R. also thanks the IRTG 2678 for a PhD contract.


Abstract

A visible-light-mediated selective allylic C–H bond oxygenation of cyclic olefins is presented. Hence, the selective, mild monooxygenation of simple cycloalkenes has been achieved using an acridinium photoredox catalyst in combination with a phosphate base and a disulfide HAT reagent under air atmosphere at room temperature. The combination of both photocatalyst and HAT reagent, which can operate through a single or two different concurrent mechanistic pathways for the formation of the allyl radical, proved highly efficient, while the reaction with exclusively one or the other mediator performs in significantly lower yields. The formed allyl radical further reacts with a molecule of oxygen to build the corresponding peroxyradical that can abstract a hydrogen atom of another cycloalkene substrate, generating the known hydroperoxide intermediate in the formation of the ketone moiety. The advantages of this method rely on the easy use of air as oxygen source, as well as the selective monooxygenation of cycloalkenes without substitution in one of the allylic positions. Besides simple cyclic olefins, the method was also successfully applied in the oxidation of natural products such as the terpene valencene or cholesterol derivatives.

Supporting Information



Publication History

Received: 03 October 2023

Accepted after revision: 29 November 2023

Accepted Manuscript online:
29 November 2023

Article published online:
05 January 2024

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References and Notes

    • 1a Cainelli G, Cardillo G. Chromium Oxidation in Organic Chemistry . Springer; Berlin: 1984
    • 1b Page PC. B, Mccarthy TJ. Oxidation Adjacent to C-C Bonds, In Comprehensive Organic Synthesis, Vol. 7. Trost BM, Flemming I. Pergamon Press; Oxford: 1991: 83-117
    • 1c Modern Oxidation Methods, 2nd ed. Bäckvall J.-E. Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 2010: 481
    • 1d Weidmann V, Maison W. Synthesis 2013; 45: 2201
  • 2 For a selected review, see: Nakamura A, Nakada M. Synthesis 2013; 45: 1421
    • 3a Dauben WG, Lorber ME, Fullerton DS. J. Org. Chem. 1969; 34: 3587
    • 3b Parish EJ. Chitrakorn S, Wei T.-Y. Synth. Commun. 1986; 16: 1371
    • 4a Catino AJ, Forslund RE, Doyle MP. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004; 126: 13622
    • 4b Shing TK. M, Su PL. Org. Lett. 2006; 8: 3149
    • 4c Choi J, Doyle MP. Org. Lett. 2007; 9: 5349
    • 4d Ang WJ, Lam Y. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2015; 4: 1048
    • 4e Ammann SE, Liu W, White MC. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016; 55: 9571
    • 4f Zhu N, Quian B, Xiong H, Bao H. Tetrahedron Lett. 2017; 58: 4125
    • 4g Wang Y, Chen X, Jin H, Wang Y. Chem. Eur. J. 2019; 25: 14273
    • 5a Recupero F, Punta C. Chem. Rev. 2007; 107: 3800
    • 5b Wertz S, Studer A. Green Chem. 2013; 15: 3116
    • 5c Horn EJ, Rosen BR, Chen Y, Tang J, Chen K, Eastgate MD, Baran PS. Nature 2016; 533: 77

      For selected reviews, see:
    • 6a Prier CK, Rankic DA, MacMillan DW. C. Chem. Rev. 2013; 113: 5322
    • 6b Skubi KL, Blum TR, Yoon TP. Chem. Rev. 2016; 116: 10035
    • 6c Kärkäs MD, Porco JA. Jr, Stephenson CR. J. Chem. Rev. 2016; 116: 9683
    • 6d Romero NA, Nicewicz DA. Chem. Rev. 2016; 116: 10075
    • 6e Marzo L, Pagire SK, Reiser O, König B. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018; 57: 10034
  • 7 For a general oxidation of non-activated positions, see: Laudadio G, Govaerts S, Wang Y, Ravelli D, Koolman HF, Fagnoni M, Djuric SW, Noël T. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018; 57: 4078
  • 8 Liu C, Liu H, Zheng X, Chen S, Lai Q, Zheng C, Huang M, Cai K, Cai Z, Cai S. ACS Catal. 2022; 12: 1375
  • 9 Uygur M, Kuhlmann JH, Pérez-Aguilar MC, Piekarski DG, García Mancheño O. Green Chem. 2021; 23: 3392

    • For reviews regarding acridinium dyes, see:
    • 10a Joshi-Pangu A, Lévesque F, Roth HG, Oliver SF, Campeau L.-C, Nicewicz D, DiRocco DA. J. Org. Chem. 2016; 81: 7244
    • 10b Tlili A, Lakhdar S. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021; 60: 19526
    • 10c Singh PP, Singh J, Srivastava V. RSC Adv. 2023; 13: 10958

      For a few examples of controlling dissolved oxygen using the stirrer speed, see:
    • 11a Åkesson M, Hagander P. Technical Reports TFRT 1998; 7571
    • 11b Meneghel M, Reis GP, Reginatto C, Malvessi E, da Silveira MM. Process Biochem. 2014; 49: 1800
    • 11c Ramesh H, Mayr T, Hobisch M, Borisov S, Klimant I, Krühne U, Woodley JM. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2016; 91: 832
  • 12 For the use of sensors to measure the oxygen dissolved from air in organic solvent, see e.g.: Ramesh H, Mayr T, Hobisch M, Borisov S, Klimant I, Krühne U, Woodley JM. J. Tech. Biotech. 2015; 91: 832
  • 13 For a photochemical mediated chlorohydroxylation of alkenes with O2, see: Symeonidis TS, Athanasoulis A, Ishii R, Uozumi Y, Yamada YM. A, Lykakis IN. ChemPhotoChem 2017; 1: 479
  • 14 General Procedure for the Allylic Oxidation Reaction of 1 A photovial was equipped with a small stirring bar (1.0 cm × 0.6 cm × 0.6 cm), cyclohexene (1, 10.1 μL, 0.10 mmol, 1.0 equiv), the HAT-II reagent (30.8 mg, 0.10 mmol, 1.0 equiv.), the base (n-Bu3MeN)O2P(On-Bu)2 (41.0 mg, 0.10 mmol, 1.0 equiv), photocatalyst PC-I (4.1 mg, 0.01 mmol, 10 mol%), and 1 mL of dry DCE. The reaction was stirred (700 rpm) open to air (through a needle) for 18 h in a photoreactor under 455 nm irradiation. The yield was determined by GC analysis using 2-methylnaphtalene or n-hexadecane as an internal standard or by NMR analysis using CH2Br2 as internal standard. The product was isolated by silica gel column chromatography using pentane/Et2O (4:1) as eluent, leading to cyclohexenone (2) as a colorless oil (13.2 mg, 0.137 mmol, 69%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 6.99 (dt, J = 10.2, 4.1 Hz, 1 H), 6.02 (dt, J = 10.2, 2.1 Hz, 1 H), 2.48–2.40 (m, 2 H), 2.35 (tdd, J = 6.2, 4.1, 2.1 Hz, 2 H), 2.02 (dq, J = 8.1, 6.1 Hz, 2 H) ppm. 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 199.9, 150.7, 130.1, 38.3, 25.8, 22.9 ppm.
  • 15 In some reactions, negligible quantity of unidentified insoluble residues was formed during the reaction, indicating partial polymerization. This was, however, more pronounced and visible for the reaction of 5.