Am J Perinatol 2024; 41(S 01): e623-e629
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1757276
Original Article

Differences in Surgery Classification and Indications for Peripartum Hysterectomy at a Major Academic Institution

Monica Meeks
1   Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
,
Kristin Voegtline
2   Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
,
Arthur J. Vaught
3   Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
,
3   Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Objective Peripartum hysterectomy is associated with increased morbidity and mortality relative to elective gynecologic hysterectomy and its incidence has grown with the rising cesarean delivery rate. We sought to understand indications and perioperative outcomes for peripartum hysterectomy at our academic institution and to evaluate differences among racial/ethnic groups.

Study Design We performed a retrospective chart review of women at a tertiary care center who underwent delivery of a newborn and had a peripartum hysterectomy during the same admission between 2008 and 2018. Demographic, clinical, and socioeconomic characteristics of patients were compared with respect to patient's race/ethnic group.

Results A total of 112 hysterectomies were included in our study. White women undergoing peripartum hysterectomy were more likely to have had an elective/anticipated peripartum hysterectomy (vs. a nonelective/emergent peripartum hysterectomy) than Black women. There were racial differences detected in the indication for peripartum hysterectomy; White women were more likely to have abnormal placentation (75 vs. 54% in Black women, p = 0.036), whereas Black women were more likely to present with postpartum hemorrhage (27 vs. 2%, p = 0.002). Black women were also more likely to undergo reoperation after peripartum hysterectomy (15 vs. 2% in White women, p = 0.048). There were no differences in any other perioperative outcomes including blood transfusion, accidental laceration, and 30-day readmission.

Conclusion Differences exist among elective versus nonelective peripartum hysterectomy by race/ethnicity and in indications for peripartum hysterectomy by race/ethnicity. Further investigation should be performed to determine whether the differences identified are due to disparate management of atony/postpartum hemorrhage or inequitable referral patterns for suspected abnormal placentation by race/ethnicity.

Key Points

  • White patients were more likely to have an elective hysterectomy when compared with Black women.

  • Abnormal placentation was the indication more often for White patients; hemorrhage for Black ones.

  • Black patients were likely to be nulliparous or at greater gestational age at the time of hysterectomy.

Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 10 June 2022

Accepted: 11 August 2022

Article published online:
28 October 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Govindappagari S, Wright JD, Ananth CV, Huang Y, DʼAlton ME, Friedman AM. Risk of peripartum hysterectomy and center hysterectomy and delivery volume. Obstet Gynecol 2016; 128 (06) 1215-1224
  • 2 Wright JD, Bonanno C, Shah M, Gaddipati S, Devine P. Peripartum hysterectomy. [published correction appears in Obstet Gynecol 2010;116(6):1461] Obstet Gynecol 2010;116(2 Pt 1):429–434
  • 3 Friedman AM, Wright JD, Ananth CV, Siddiq Z, D'Alton ME, Bateman BT. Population-based risk for peripartum hysterectomy during low- and moderate-risk delivery hospitalizations. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016; 215 (05) 640.e1-640.e8
  • 4 Lawson SM, Chou B, Martin KL, Ryan I, Eke AC, Martin KD. The association between race/ethnicity and peripartum hysterectomy and the risk of perioperative complications. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2020; 151 (01) 57-66
  • 5 Dandolu V, Graul AB, Lyons A, Matteo D. Obstetrical hysterectomy, cesarean delivery and abnormal placentation. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2012; 25 (01) 74-77
  • 6 Bakshi S, Meyer BA. Indications for and outcomes of emergency peripartum hysterectomy. A five-year review. J Reprod Med 2000; 45 (09) 733-737
  • 7 Forna F, Miles AM, Jamieson DJ. Emergency peripartum hysterectomy: a comparison of cesarean and postpartum hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 190 (05) 1440-1444
  • 8 Main EK, Cape V, Abreo A. et al. Reduction of severe maternal morbidity from hemorrhage using a state perinatal quality collaborative. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2017; 216 (03) 298.e1-298.e11
  • 9 D'Alton ME, Main EK, Menard MK, Levy BS. The national partnership for maternal safety. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 123 (05) 973-977
  • 10 Silver RM, Fox KA, Barton JR. et al. Center of excellence for placenta accreta. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 212 (05) 561-568
  • 11 Fullbrook AI, Redman EP, Michaels K. et al. A multidisciplinary perioperative medicine clinic to improve high-risk patient outcomes: a service evaluation audit. Anaesth Intensive Care 2022; 50 (03) 227-233
  • 12 Vestal NL, Sangara RN, Mandelbaum RS. et al. Racial and ethnic disparity in characteristics and outcomes of women with placenta accreta spectrum: a comparative study. Reprod Sci 2022; 29 (07) 1988-2000
  • 13 Tucker MJ, Berg CJ, Callaghan WM, Hsia J. The black-white disparity in pregnancy-related mortality from 5 conditions: differences in prevalence and case-fatality rates. Am J Public Health 2007; 97 (02) 247-251
  • 14 Kim LH, Caughey AB, Laguardia JC, Escobar GJ. Racial and ethnic differences in the prevalence of placenta previa. J Perinatol 2012; 32 (04) 260-264
  • 15 Stark EL, Grobman WA, Miller ES. The association between maternal race and ethnicity and risk factors for primary cesarean delivery in nulliparous women. Am J Perinatol 2021; 38 (04) 350-356
  • 16 Bogardus MH, Wen T, Gyamfi-Bannerman C. et al. Racial and ethnic disparities in peripartum hysterectomy risk and outcomes. Am J Perinatol 2021; 38 (10) 999-1009