Download PDF
J Pediatr Intensive Care
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1768031
Original Article

Terminal Withdrawal of Mechanical Ventilation in a PICU

J. Scott Baird 
1   Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York, United States
,
Natasha Z. Piracha
1   Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York, United States
,
Max E. Lindeman
1   Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York, United States
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Data regarding a terminal withdrawal of mechanical ventilation (TWMV) in pediatric patients, in particular the time to death, would be helpful to family and hospital staff. This retrospective case series will review the TWMV in pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) patients at our hospital between 2015 and 2020. There were 222 PICU deaths and 53 of these patients died following a TWMV. The time to death was <1 hour in 37 patients, from 1 to 24 hours in 12 patients, and >24 hours in 4 patients. Neither age nor the duration of mechanical ventilation prior to TWMV was associated with time to death. TWMV was complicated by concurrent withdrawal of cardiac support devices in 9 patients and by a recent cardiac arrest in 3 patients (1 of whom also had a cardiac support device withdrawal), and the time to death for these 11 patients was less than 1 hour (p = 0.01 vs. all others). The time to death for those without concurrent withdrawal of cardiac support devices or recent cardiac arrest was shorter in those with a higher fraction of inspired oxygen but was not associated with positive end expiratory pressure. Time to death following a TWMV was less than a day in more than 90% of our patients and was not associated with patient age or the duration of mechanical ventilation. However, in patients without a recent cardiac arrest or concurrent withdrawal of cardiac support devices, nearly 1 in 10 survived a TWMV for more than a day, while those with a recent cardiac arrest or concurrent withdrawal of cardiac support devices survived for less than an hour.

Keywords

terminal - terminal withdrawal - mechanical ventilation


Publication History

Received: 10 August 2022

Accepted: 05 March 2023

Article published online:
18 April 2023

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 Trowbridge A, Walter JK, McConathey E, Morrison W, Feudtner C. Modes of death within a children's hospital. Pediatrics 2018; 142 (04) e20174182
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Meert KL, Keele L, Morrison W. et al; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Collaborative Pediatric Critical Care Research Network. End-of-life practices among tertiary care PICUs in the United States: a multicenter study. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2015; 16 (07) e231-e238
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Winter MC, Day TE, Ledbetter DR. et al. Machine learning to predict cardiac death within 1 hour after terminal extubation. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2021; 22 (02) 161-171
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Shore PM, Huang R, Roy L. et al. Development of a bedside tool to predict time to death after withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies in infants and children. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2012; 13 (04) 415-422
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Zawistowski CA, DeVita MA. A descriptive study of children dying in the pediatric intensive care unit after withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2004; 5 (03) 216-223
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Cooke CR, Hotchkin DL, Engelberg RA, Rubinson L, Curtis JR. Predictors of time to death after terminal withdrawal of mechanical ventilation in the ICU. Chest 2010; 138 (02) 289-297
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Verberne LM, Kars MC, Schouten-van Meeteren AYN. et al. Parental experiences and coping strategies when caring for a child receiving paediatric palliative care: a qualitative study. Eur J Pediatr 2019; 178 (07) 1075-1085
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Meert KL, Shear K, Newth CJ. et al; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Collaborative Pediatric Critical Care Research Network. Follow-up study of complicated grief among parents eighteen months after a child's death in the pediatric intensive care unit. J Palliat Med 2011; 14 (02) 207-214
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Chan JD, Treece PD, Engelberg RA. et al. Narcotic and benzodiazepine use after withdrawal of life support: association with time to death?. Chest 2004; 126 (01) 286-293
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Chen Y, Jiang J, Peng W, Zhang C. Palliative sedation for children at end of life: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Palliat Care 2022; 21 (01) 57
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Carter BS, Jones PM. Evidence-based comfort care for neonates towards the end of life. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2013; 18 (02) 88-92
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Grégoire MC, Frager G. Ensuring pain relief for children at the end of life. Pain Res Manag 2006; 11 (03) 163-171
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Huynh TN, Walling AM, Le TX, Kleerup EC, Liu H, Wenger NS. Factors associated with palliative withdrawal of mechanical ventilation and time to death after withdrawal. J Palliat Med 2013; 16 (11) 1368-1374
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Long AC, Muni S, Treece PD. et al. Time to death after terminal withdrawal of mechanical ventilation: specific respiratory and physiologic parameters may inform physician predictions. J Palliat Med 2015; 18 (12) 1040-1047
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Affonseca CA, Carvalho LFA, Quinet RPB, Guimarães MCDC, Cury VF, Rotta AT. Palliative extubation: five-year experience in a pediatric hospital. J Pediatr (Rio J) 2020; 96 (05) 652-659
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar