Download PDF
Semin intervent Radiol 2023; 40(05): 419-426
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1775723
Review Article

Advancing IR in Underserved Regions: Interventional Radiology Simulation Near and Far

Cornelius K. Koech
1   Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya
,
Victor I. Rivera
2   Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
,
Kevin Anton
2   Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
,
Robert G. Dixon
3   University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Simulation facilitates learning by imitating real-world systems or processes utilizing educational tools and models. Various fields, including business, aviation, and education use simulation for training. In healthcare, simulation provides trainees opportunities to develop procedural skills in a safe environment, building their understanding through hands-on interactions and experiences rather than passive didactics. Simulation is classified into low, medium, and high fidelity, based on how closely it mimics real-life experience. Its use in education is a valuable adjunct to instructional support and training with multiple potential benefits. Interventional radiology (IR) trainees can build technical and clinical proficiency prior to working directly on a patient. Simulation promotes experiential learning, constructivist learning, and student centeredness, thus giving students control over their learning and knowledge acquisition. More recently, the creative use of remote simulation has augmented traditional virtual didactic lectures, thereby further engaging international learners and enhancing remote collaboration. Despite the challenges to implementation, the addition of simulation in IR education is proving invaluable to supporting trainees and physicians in underserved regions.

Keywords

simulation - high-fidelity simulation - simulation in education - remote simulation - global health education - interventional radiology


Publication History

Article published online:
02 November 2023

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Aebersold M. Simulation-based learning: no longer a novelty in undergraduate education. Online J Issues Nurs 2018; 23 (02) DOI: 10.3912/OJIN.Vol23No02PPT39.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Bienstock J, Heuer A. A review on the evolution of simulation-based training to help build a safer future. Medicine (Baltimore) 2022; 101 (25) e29503
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Dawson S. Procedural simulation: a primer. Radiology 2006; 241 (01) 17-25
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Harrison RL. Introduction to Monte Carlo simulation. AIP Conf Proc 2010; 1204: 17-21
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Team UoH-SaM. Introduction to Modeling and Simulation Systems. University of Houston. Accessed August 8, 2023 at: https://uh.edu/~lcr3600/simulation/historical.html
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Gould D. Using simulation for interventional radiology training. Br J Radiol 2010; 83 (991) 546-553
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Gawande A. The learning curve. The New Yorker, Jan 28; 2002: 52-61
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Amin A, Salsamendi J, Sullivan T. High-fidelity endovascular simulation. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 2019; 22 (01) 7-13
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Shen Z, Yang F, Gao P. et al. A novel clinical-simulated suture education for basic surgical skill: suture on the biological tissue fixed on standardized patient evaluated with objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) tools. J Invest Surg 2018; 31 (04) 333-339
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Noda M, Shibasaki I, Okada Y. Acquisition of surgical technique by surgical training using a Swine model—evaluation of the suture technique using a WKS-2 simulator. AME Med J 2022; 7 DOI: 10.21037/amj-21-59.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 May BJ, Khoury JK, Winokur RS. Tools for simulation; low budget and no budget. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 2019; 22 (01) 3-6
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Mendiratta-Lala M, Williams T, de Quadros N, Bonnett J, Mendiratta V. The use of a simulation center to improve resident proficiency in performing ultrasound-guided procedures. Acad Radiol 2010; 17 (04) 535-540
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Coates PJ, Zealley IA, Chakraverty S. Endovascular simulator is of benefit in the acquisition of basic skills by novice operators. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2010; 21 (01) 130-134
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Prenner SB, Wayne DB, Sweis RN, Cohen ER, Feinglass JM, Schimmel DR. Simulation-based education leads to decreased use of fluoroscopy in diagnostic coronary angiography. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2018; 91 (06) 1054-1059
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Robinson WP, Doucet DR, Simons JP. et al. An intensive vascular surgical skills and simulation course for vascular trainees improves procedural knowledge and self-rated procedural competence. J Vasc Surg 2017; 65 (03) 907-915.e3
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Seymour NE, Gallagher AG, Roman SA. et al. Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study. Ann Surg 2002; 236 (04) 458-463 , discussion 463–464
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Knudsen BE, Matsumoto ED, Chew BH. et al. A randomized, controlled, prospective study validating the acquisition of percutaneous renal collecting system access skills using a computer based hybrid virtual reality surgical simulator: phase I. J Urol 2006; 176 (05) 2173-2178
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Patel R, Dennick R. Simulation based teaching in interventional radiology training: is it effective?. Clin Radiol 2017; 72 (03) 266.e7-266.e14
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Andreatta P, Chen Y, Marsh M, Cho K. Simulation-based training improves applied clinical placement of ultrasound-guided PICCs. Support Care Cancer 2011; 19 (04) 539-543
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Holtmannspötter M, Crossley RA, Liebig T, Gallagher AG. Metric-based simulation training to proficiency for endovascular thrombectomy in ischemic stroke. Front Neurol 2022; 13: 742263
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Koch AD, Ekkelenkamp VE, Haringsma J, Schoon EJ, de Man RA, Kuipers EJ. Simulated colonoscopy training leads to improved performance during patient-based assessment. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 81 (03) 630-636
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Stepan K, Zeiger J, Hanchuk S. et al. Immersive virtual reality as a teaching tool for neuroanatomy. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2017; 7 (10) 1006-1013
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Markovic J, Peyser C, Cavoores T, Fletcher E, Peterson D, Shortell C. Impact of endovascular simulator training on vascular surgery as a career choice in medical students. J Vasc Surg 2012; 55 (05) 1515-1521
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Mandal I, Ojha U. Training in interventional radiology: a simulation-based approach. J Med Educ Curric Dev 2020; 7: 2382120520912744
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Mirza S, Athreya S. Review of simulation training in interventional radiology. Acad Radiol 2018; 25 (04) 529-539
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Fragapane L, Li W, Ben Khallouq B, Cheng ZJ, Harris DM. Comparison of knowledge retention between high-fidelity patient simulation and read-only participants in undergraduate biomedical science education. Adv Physiol Educ 2018; 42 (04) 599-604
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Grober ED, Hamstra SJ, Wanzel KR. et al. Laboratory based training in urological microsurgery with bench model simulators: a randomized controlled trial evaluating the durability of technical skill. J Urol 2004; 172 (01) 378-381
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Massoth C, Röder H, Ohlenburg H. et al. High-fidelity is not superior to low-fidelity simulation but leads to overconfidence in medical students. BMC Med Educ 2019; 19 (01) 29
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Dzikowicz DJ, Carey MG. Implementing interactive technology to teach electrocardiographic interpret. -ation online. J Prof Nurs 2022; 42: 148-155
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Campos N, Nogal M, Caliz C, Juan AA. Simulation-based education involving online and on-campus models in different European Universities. Int J Educ Technol High Educ 2020;17(08). Doi: org/10.1186/s41239-020-0181-y
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Almousa O, Zhang R, Dimma M. et al. Virtual reality technology and remote digital application for tele-simulation and global medical education: an innovative hybrid system for clinical training. Simul Gaming 2021; 52 (05) 614-634
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Hammar Wijkmark C, Heldal I, Metallinou MM. Can remote virtual simulation improve practice-based training? Presence and performance in incident commander education. Presence (Camb Mass) 2019; 28: 127-152
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Wijkmark CH, Metallinou MM, Heldal I. Remote virtual simulation for incident commanders—cognitive aspects. Appl Sci (Basel) 2021; 11 (14) 6434
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Shao M, Kashyap R, Niven A. et al. Feasibility of an international remote simulation training program in critical care delivery: a pilot study. Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes 2018; 2 (03) 229-233
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Gabr AM, Li N, Schenning RC. et al. Diagnostic and interventional radiology case volume and education in the age of pandemics: impact analysis and potential future directions. Acad Radiol 2020; 27 (10) 1481-1488
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Wu Y, Mondal P, Stewart M, Ngo R, Burbridge B. Bringing radiology education to a new reality: a pilot study of using virtual reality as a remote educational tool. Can Assoc Radiol J 2023; 74 (02) 251-263
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Shi P, Guo S, Jin X, Hirata H, Tamiya T, Kawanishi M. A novel catheter interaction simulating method for virtual reality interventional training systems. Med Biol Eng Comput 2023; 61 (03) 685-697
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Hayden EM, Khatri A, Kelly HR, Yager PH, Salazar GM. Mannequin-based telesimulation: increasing access to simulation-based education. Acad Emerg Med 2018; 25 (02) 144-147
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Al-Elq AH. Simulation-based medical teaching and learning. J Family Community Med 2010; 17 (01) 35-40
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Scherer K, Winokur RS. Multidisciplinary team training simulation in interventional radiology. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 2019; 22 (01) 32-34
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar