Int J Angiol
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1786857
Original Article

Role of Retrograde Tibiopedal Access in Limb Salvage in Patients with Critical Lower Limb Ischemia

Baker M. Ghoneim
1   Department of Vascular Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
,
Khaled M. Abdo Elhindawy
1   Department of Vascular Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
,
Fouad S. Fouad
1   Department of Vascular Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
,
Mostafa H. Abo Ellil
1   Department of Vascular Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
,
Ahmed A. Shaker
1   Department of Vascular Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
› Author Affiliations
Funding None.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of retrograde tibiopedal access as an alternative approach in cases of critical limb ischemia (CLI) when antegrade access has failed. A prospective study was conducted that included patients with CLI who underwent tibiopedal access after failed antegrade recanalization from January 2018 to June 2022. Follow-up was conducted at 6, 12, and 24 months. The primary outcomes evaluated were technical success rate and primary patency. Secondary outcomes included complication rate, mortality rate, and limb salvage rate (LSR). Forty-eight patients had CLI and Trans Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus infrainguinal lesions. The retrograde approach was used through the anterior tibial artery in 28 patients (58%), the posterior tibial artery in 18 patients (37.5%), and the peroneal artery in 2 patients (4.5%). Technical success was achieved in 90% of patients (43 patients). There was a significant increase in the anklebrachial index after the procedure with a mean follow-up of 22 months. Twenty-two months primary patency rate was 85.2%, while secondary patency rate was 100% and LSR was 96%, respectively. There was no mortality in the series. Retrograde tibiopedal approach is an alternative option for managing peripheral arterial disease and CLI. This method offers another means of crossing lesions when antegrade access failed, and the intervention can be completed either in an antegrade or retrograde approach. As the retrograde approach does not impact access site, considered a feasible safe treatment alternative which increase the success rate of endovascular treatment.

Authors' Contributions

A.A.S. and B.M.G. contributed to writing, data collection, and revision; K.M.A.E., M.H.A.E., and F.S.F. to revision and writing. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.




Publication History

Article published online:
10 May 2024

© 2024. International College of Angiology. This article is published by Thieme.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 El-Sayed H, Bennett ME, Loh TM, Davies MG. Retrograde pedal access and endovascular revascularization: a safe and effective technique for high-risk patients with complex tibial vessel disease. Ann Vasc Surg 2016; 31: 91-98
  • 2 Hua WR, Yi MQ, Min TL, Feng SN, Xuan LZ, Xing J. Popliteal versus tibial retrograde access for subintimal arterial flossing with antegrade-retrograde intervention (SAFARI) technique. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2013; 46 (02) 249-254
  • 3 Ye M, Zhang H, Huang X. et al. Retrograde popliteal approach for challenging occlusions of the femoral-popliteal arteries. J Vasc Surg 2013; 58 (01) 84-89
  • 4 Mustapha JA, Saab F, McGoff T. et al. Tibio-pedal arterial minimally invasive retrograde revascularization in patients with advanced peripheral vascular disease: the TAMI technique, original case series. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2014; 83 (06) 987-994
  • 5 Walker C. Pedal access in critical limb ischemia. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 2014; 55 (02) 225-227
  • 6 Bazan HA, Le L, Donovan M, Sidhom T, Smith TA, Sternbergh III WC. Retrograde pedal access for patients with critical limb ischemia. J Vasc Surg 2014; 60 (02) 375-381
  • 7 Kuroki MT, Parikh UM, Chandra V. How I do it: pedal access and pedal loop revascularization for patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia. J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech 2023; 9 (03) 101236
  • 8 Vance AZ, Leung DA, Clark TW. Tips for pedal access: technical evolution and review. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 2018; 59 (05) 685-691
  • 9 Dua A, Chandra V. Retrograde pedal access-cutting edge or comical?. Vasc Endovascular Surg 2018; 52 (08) 593-595
  • 10 Giannopoulos S, Palena LM, Armstrong EJ. Technical success and complication rates of retrograde arterial access for endovascular therapy for critical limb ischaemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2021; 61 (02) 270-279
  • 11 Botti Jr CF, Ansel GM, Silver MJ, Barker BJ, South S. Percutaneous retrograde tibial access in limb salvage. J Endovasc Ther 2003; 10 (03) 614-618
  • 12 Spinosa DJ, Harthun NL, Bissonette EA. et al. Subintimal arterial flossing with antegrade-retrograde intervention (SAFARI) for subintimal recanalization to treat chronic critical limb ischemia. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2005; 16 (01) 37-44
  • 13 Taha AG, Abou Ali AN, Al-Khoury G. et al. Outcomes of infrageniculate retrograde versus transfemoral access for endovascular intervention for chronic lower extremity ischemia. J Vasc Surg 2018; 68 (04) 1088-1095
  • 14 Goltz JP, Planert M, Horn M. et al. Retrograde transpedal access for revascularization of below-the-knee arteries in patients with critical limb ischemia after an unsuccessful antegrade transfemoral approach. Röfo Fortschr Geb Röntgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 2016; 188 (10) 940-948
  • 15 Gandini R, Pipitone V, Stefanini M. et al. The “Safari” technique to perform difficult subintimal infragenicular vessels. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2007; 30 (03) 469-473